Morgan R M, Levin E A
UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, UCL Department of Security and Crime Science, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, UK.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2019 Sep 13;1:243-252. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.09.002. eCollection 2019.
This study presents analysis of forensic science research funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) research councils (2009-2018), representing 150 projects with a cumulative value of £56.1 m (0.01% of the total UKRI budget over this time period). The findings indicate that dedicated forensic science funding represents only 46.0% of the projects included in the dataset. Research focussed on developing technological outputs represented 69.5% of the total funding (£37.2 m) in comparison to foundational research which represented 19.2% (£10.7 m). Traditional forensic science evidence types such as fingerprints and DNA received 1.3% and 5.1% of the total funding respectively, in comparison to digital and cyber projects which received 25.7%. These data offer insight into the scale of the funding crisis in forensic science in the UK, and the need to increase the resources available, to develop ways of articulating value and to ensure that both technological and foundational research are enabled.
本研究对英国研究与创新署(UKRI)各研究委员会资助的法医学研究(2009 - 2018年)进行了分析,涵盖150个项目,累计价值5610万英镑(占该时期UKRI总预算的0.01%)。研究结果表明,专项法医学资金仅占数据集中项目的46.0%。专注于开发技术成果的研究占总资金(3720万英镑)的69.5%,而基础研究占19.2%(1070万英镑)。传统法医学证据类型,如指纹和DNA,分别获得总资金的1.3%和5.1%,相比之下,数字和网络项目获得了25.7%。这些数据揭示了英国法医学资金危机的规模,以及增加可用资源、制定阐明价值的方法并确保技术研究和基础研究都能得到支持的必要性。