• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防性药物费用分担的降低优先惠及高免赔额健康保险计划且设有健康储蓄账户的低收入糖尿病患者。

Reduced Cost-sharing for Preventive Drugs Preferentially Benefits Low-income Patients With Diabetes in High Deductible Health Plans With Health Savings Accounts.

作者信息

Ross-Degnan Dennis, Wallace Jamie, Zhang Fang, Soumerai Stephen B, Garabedian Laura, Wharam J Frank

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S4-S13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001295.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001295
PMID:32412948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7676281/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High deductible health plans linked to Health Savings Accounts (HSA-HDHPs) must include all care under the deductible except for select preventive services. Some employers and insurers have adopted Preventive Drug Lists (PDLs) that exempt specific classes of medications from deductibles.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the association between shifts to PDL coverage and medication utilization among patients with diabetes in HSA-HDHPs.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A natural experiment comparing pre-post changes in monthly and annual outcomes in matched study groups.

SUBJECTS

The intervention group included 1744 commercially-insured HSA-HDHP patients with diabetes age 12-64 years switched by employers to PDL coverage; the control group included 3349 propensity-matched HSA-HDHP patients whose employers offered no PDL.

MEASURES

Outcomes were out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for medications and the number of pharmacy fills converted to 30-day equivalents.

RESULTS

Transition to the PDL was associated with a relative pre-post decrease of $612 (-35%, P<0.001) per member OOP medication expenditures; OOP reductions were higher for key classes of antidiabetic and cardiovascular medicines listed on the PDL; the policy did not affect unlisted classes. The PDL group experienced relative increases in medication use of 6.0 30-day fills per person during the year (+11.2%, P<0.001); the increase was more than twice as large for lower-income (+6.6 fills, +12.6%, P<0.001) than higher-income (+3.0 fills, +5.1%, P=0.024) patients.

CONCLUSION

Transition to a PDL which covers important classes of medication to manage diabetes and cardiovascular conditions is associated with substantial annual OOP cost savings for patients with diabetes and increased utilization of important classes of medications, especially for lower-income patients.

摘要

背景

与健康储蓄账户相关的高免赔额健康计划(HSA-HDHPs)必须涵盖除特定预防性服务外的免赔额范围内的所有护理。一些雇主和保险公司采用了预防性药物清单(PDLs),将特定类别的药物排除在免赔额之外。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨转向PDL覆盖与HSA-HDHPs中糖尿病患者药物使用之间的关联。

研究设计

一项自然实验,比较匹配研究组中月度和年度结果的前后变化。

研究对象

干预组包括1744名年龄在12至64岁之间的商业保险HSA-HDHP糖尿病患者,其雇主将他们转为PDL覆盖;对照组包括3349名倾向匹配的HSA-HDHP患者,其雇主未提供PDL。

测量指标

结果指标为药物的自付费用(OOP)以及转换为30天等效量的药房配药次数。

结果

向PDL的转变与每位成员OOP药物支出相对前后减少612美元(-35%,P<0.001)相关;PDL上列出的关键抗糖尿病和心血管药物类别的OOP减少幅度更大;该政策对未列出的类别没有影响。PDL组在这一年中每人的药物使用相对增加了6.0次30天配药(+11.2%,P<0.001);低收入患者(+6.6次配药,+12.6%,P<0.001)的增加幅度是高收入患者(+3.0次配药,+5.1%,P=0.024)的两倍多。

结论

转向覆盖治疗糖尿病和心血管疾病的重要药物类别的PDL,与糖尿病患者每年大量节省OOP成本以及重要药物类别的使用增加相关,尤其是对于低收入患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e34/7676281/b05db466b516/nihms-1606180-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e34/7676281/02c07259483c/nihms-1606180-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e34/7676281/b05db466b516/nihms-1606180-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e34/7676281/02c07259483c/nihms-1606180-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e34/7676281/b05db466b516/nihms-1606180-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Reduced Cost-sharing for Preventive Drugs Preferentially Benefits Low-income Patients With Diabetes in High Deductible Health Plans With Health Savings Accounts.预防性药物费用分担的降低优先惠及高免赔额健康保险计划且设有健康储蓄账户的低收入糖尿病患者。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S4-S13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001295.
2
Effects of Adopting Preventive Drug Lists on Medication Costs and Disparities by Income Over 2 Years: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study.采用预防性药物清单对两年内药物成本及收入差异的影响:糖尿病转化自然实验(NEXT-D)研究
Diabetes Care. 2025 Mar 1;48(3):341-352. doi: 10.2337/dc24-0361.
3
Utilization and Spending With Preventive Drug Lists for Asthma Medications in High-Deductible Health Plans.高自付额健康计划中哮喘药物预防用药清单的使用和支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331259. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31259.
4
Impact of high-deductible insurance on adjuvant hormonal therapy use in breast cancer.高免赔额保险对乳腺癌辅助激素治疗使用的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;171(1):235-242. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4821-z. Epub 2018 May 12.
5
Controller Medication Use and Exacerbations for Children and Adults With Asthma in High-Deductible Health Plans.高自付额健康计划中儿童和成人哮喘患者的控制器药物使用与恶化情况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;175(8):807-816. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0747.
6
Diabetes Outpatient Care and Acute Complications Before and After High-Deductible Insurance Enrollment: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study.高免赔额保险参保前后的糖尿病门诊护理与急性并发症:糖尿病转化自然实验(NEXT-D)研究
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):358-368. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8411.
7
High-Deductible Health Plans Paired With Health Savings Accounts Increased Medication Cost Burden Among Individuals With Bipolar Disorder.高免赔额健康计划与健康储蓄账户相结合增加了双相情感障碍患者的药物成本负担。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 9;83(2):20m13865. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20m13865.
8
Acute Diabetes Complications After Transition to a Value-Based Medication Benefit.基于价值的药物福利转换后出现的急性糖尿病并发症。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235309. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5309.
9
Effect of High-Deductible Insurance on High-Acuity Outcomes in Diabetes: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study.高免赔额保险对糖尿病高急症结局的影响:糖尿病翻译自然实验(NEXT-D)研究。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):940-948. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1183. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
10
Effect on drug utilization and expenditures of a cost-share change from copayment to coinsurance.从共付额改为 coinsurance 对药物使用和支出的影响
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(9):765-77. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.9.765.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Adopting Preventive Drug Lists on Medication Costs and Disparities by Income Over 2 Years: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study.采用预防性药物清单对两年内药物成本及收入差异的影响:糖尿病转化自然实验(NEXT-D)研究
Diabetes Care. 2025 Mar 1;48(3):341-352. doi: 10.2337/dc24-0361.
2
Enrollment in High-Deductible Health Plans and Incident Diabetes Complications.参加高免赔额健康计划与糖尿病并发症发病风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243394. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3394.
3
Acute Diabetes Complications After Transition to a Value-Based Medication Benefit.
基于价值的药物福利转换后出现的急性糖尿病并发症。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235309. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5309.
4
Utilization and Spending With Preventive Drug Lists for Asthma Medications in High-Deductible Health Plans.高自付额健康计划中哮喘药物预防用药清单的使用和支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331259. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31259.
5
Evaluation of High-Deductible Health Plans and Acute Glycemic Complications Among Adults With Diabetes.评估高免赔额健康计划与糖尿病成人急性血糖并发症。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250602. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50602.
6
Can Alternative Payment Models And Value-Based Insurance Design Alter The Course Of Diabetes In The United States?替代支付模式和基于价值的保险设计能否改变美国糖尿病的进程?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jul;41(7):980-984. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00235. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
Cost-sharing and adherence, clinical outcomes, health care utilization, and costs: A systematic literature review.费用分担与依从性、临床结局、医疗保健利用和成本:系统文献回顾。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jan;29(1):4-16. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.21270. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
8
Effects of the Full Coverage Policy of Essential Medicines on Inequality in Medication Adherence: A Longitudinal Study in Taizhou, China.基本药物全覆盖政策对药物依从性不平等的影响:中国泰州的一项纵向研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 3;13:802219. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.802219. eCollection 2022.
9
Factors Associated with Free Medicine Use in Patients with Hypertension and Diabetes: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study on Full Coverage Policy for Essential Medicines in Taizhou, China.与高血压和糖尿病患者使用免费药物相关的因素:中国台州基本药物全覆盖政策的 4 年纵向研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 15;18(22):11966. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211966.
10
Association Between High Deductible Health Plans and Cost-Related Non-adherence to Medications Among Americans with Diabetes: an Observational Study.高免赔额健康计划与美国糖尿病患者药物费用相关不依从的相关性:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1910-1916. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06937-9. Epub 2021 Jul 29.