Suppr超能文献

超声角膜测厚仪和高分辨率光学相干断层扫描测量的角膜总厚度和上皮厚度。

Corneal Total and Epithelial Thickness Measured by Sonogage Ultrasound Pachometry and High-resolution Optical Coherence Tomography.

机构信息

School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2020 May;97(5):346-350. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001508.

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE

This research questions the validity of using the Sonogage ultrasound (US) pachometer to measure corneal epithelial thickness and coincidentally provides confirmation for the conventional view of the mechanism of orthokeratology (OK) based on central epithelial thinning.

PURPOSE

The Sonogage (Corneo-Gage Plus 1) pachometer uses A-scan US to measure total corneal thickness. It is claimed that this instrument can also measure corneal epithelial thickness. We sought to validate this claim by comparing total and epithelial thickness measurements with the Sonogage with those obtained with high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

Fourteen non-contact lens wearers and 14 subjects who had worn Paragon CRT OK lenses overnight for greater than 1 month were recruited. Three OCT and five US measurements were taken in one eye of each subject. Depending on normality of data, paired t tests or Wilcoxon tests were used to compare total and epithelial thicknesses measured with the Sonogage pachometer and the Tomey Casia OCT. Pearson or Spearman correlation analyses were used to examine relationships between measurements obtained with the two instruments.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in total corneal thickness measurements between the two instruments. Although a significant correlation was found (r = 0.916, P < .001), the Sonogage consistently measured greater total corneal thickness than did the OCT (+19.5 ± 9.2 μm; P < .001). Epithelial thickness using the Sonogage showed little variation (range, 46.4 to 50.0 μm), whereas epithelial thickness using the OCT ranged from 30.7 to 54.7 μm. There was no significant correlation between epithelial thicknesses obtained with the two instruments (r = -0.135, P = .49). Epithelial thickness measured by OCT was significantly thinner in OK wearers (35.8 ± 2.8 μm) than in nonlens wearers (46.7 ± 4.5 μm, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Sonogage is not able to measure epithelial thickness in vivo, returning essentially identical measurements over a range of epithelial thicknesses. Optical coherence tomography measurements confirm the conventional view of the mechanism of OK based on central epithelial thinning.

摘要

意义

这项研究对使用 Sonogage 超声(US)角膜测厚仪测量角膜上皮厚度的有效性提出了质疑,同时也为基于中央上皮变薄的角膜塑形术(OK)机制的传统观点提供了证实。

目的

Sonogage(Corneo-Gage Plus 1)角膜测厚仪使用 A 型超声测量总角膜厚度。据称,该仪器还可以测量角膜上皮厚度。我们通过将总厚度和上皮厚度的测量值与 Sonogage 与高分辨率光学相干断层扫描(OCT)的测量值进行比较,来验证这一说法。

方法

招募了 14 名非隐形眼镜佩戴者和 14 名佩戴 Paragon CRT OK 镜片过夜超过 1 个月的受试者。对每个受试者的一只眼进行了三次 OCT 和五次 US 测量。根据数据的正态性,使用配对 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 检验比较 Sonogage 角膜测厚仪和 Tomey Casia OCT 测量的总厚度和上皮厚度。使用 Pearson 或 Spearman 相关分析检查两种仪器测量值之间的关系。

结果

两种仪器测量的总角膜厚度存在显著差异。尽管发现了显著的相关性(r = 0.916,P <.001),但 Sonogage 始终测量到的总角膜厚度比 OCT 测量到的更大(+19.5 ± 9.2 μm;P <.001)。使用 Sonogage 测量的上皮厚度变化不大(范围为 46.4 至 50.0 μm),而使用 OCT 测量的上皮厚度范围为 30.7 至 54.7 μm。两种仪器测量的上皮厚度之间没有显著相关性(r = -0.135,P =.49)。OK 佩戴者的上皮厚度(35.8 ± 2.8 μm)明显比非镜片佩戴者(46.7 ± 4.5 μm,P <.001)薄。

结论

Sonogage 无法在体内测量上皮厚度,在一系列上皮厚度范围内返回基本相同的测量值。光学相干断层扫描测量结果证实了基于中央上皮变薄的 OK 机制的传统观点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验