资深医师对人工智能和临床决策支持系统的看法：来自专业学会的数据的定量和定性分析。
What do senior physicians think about AI and clinical decision support systems: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from specialty societies.
机构信息
Lithuania.
Faculty of Clinical Informatics, London, UK.
出版信息
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 May;20(3):324-328. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0317.
Abstract
AIMS
The aim was to help physicians engage with NHS and other policymakers about the use, procurement and regulation of artificial intelligence, algorithms and clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in the NHS by identifying the professional benefits of and concerns about these systems.
METHODS
We piloted a three-page survey instrument with closed and open-ended questions on SurveyMonkey, then circulated it to specialty societies via email. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to analyse responses.
RESULTS
The results include the current usage of CDSS; identified benefits; concerns about quality; concerns about regulation, professional practice, ethics and liability, as well as actions being taken by the specialty societies to address these; and aspects of CDSS quality that need to be tested.
CONCLUSION
While results confirm many expected benefits and concerns about CDSS, they raise new professional concerns and suggest further actions to explore with partners on behalf of the physician community.
摘要
目的
通过确定医生对这些系统的专业益处和担忧，帮助医生就 NHS 以及其他政策制定者关于在 NHS 中使用、采购和监管人工智能、算法和临床决策支持系统（CDSS）进行沟通。
方法
我们在 SurveyMonkey 上试用了一个带有封闭式和开放式问题的三页调查问卷，然后通过电子邮件将其分发给专业协会。我们使用定量和定性方法来分析回复。
结果
结果包括 CDSS 的当前使用情况；确定的益处；对质量的担忧；对监管、专业实践、道德和责任的担忧，以及专业协会为解决这些问题而采取的行动；以及需要测试的 CDSS 质量方面。
结论
虽然结果证实了 CDSS 的许多预期益处和担忧，但它们也引发了新的专业担忧，并建议代表医生社区与合作伙伴进一步采取行动进行探索。
相似文献
1
What do senior physicians think about AI and clinical decision support systems: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from specialty societies.资深医师对人工智能和临床决策支持系统的看法：来自专业学会的数据的定量和定性分析。
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 May;20(3):324-328. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0317.
2
Doctors' perception on the ethical use of AI-enabled clinical decision support systems for antibiotic prescribing recommendations in Singapore.医生对新加坡抗生素处方推荐中使用人工智能支持的临床决策支持系统的伦理看法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;12:1420032. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420032. eCollection 2024.
3
Are physicians ready for precision antibiotic prescribing? A qualitative analysis of the acceptance of artificial intelligence-enabled clinical decision support systems in India and Singapore.医生是否准备好进行精准的抗生素处方？对印度和新加坡人工智能支持的临床决策支持系统接受情况的定性分析。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Dec;35:76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
4
"Many roads lead to Rome and the Artificial Intelligence only shows me one road": an interview study on physician attitudes regarding the implementation of computerised clinical decision support systems.“条条大路通罗马，而人工智能只给我指了一条路”：一项关于医生对实施计算机临床决策支持系统的态度的访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 May 6;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00787-8.
5
Exploring the feasibility of an artificial intelligence based clinical decision support system for cutaneous melanoma detection in primary care - a mixed method study.探索基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统在初级保健中用于皮肤黑色素瘤检测的可行性——一项混合方法研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Mar;42(1):51-60. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2283190. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory.基于机器学习的临床决策支持的伦理：透过专业化理论的视角分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Aug 19;22(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00679-3.
7
Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Geriatrics: An Ethical Analysis.基于人工智能的老年病学临床决策支持系统：伦理分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Sep;24(9):1271-1276.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.06.008. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
8
A Clinical Decision Support System for Sleep Staging Tasks With Explanations From Artificial Intelligence: User-Centered Design and Evaluation Study.具有人工智能解释的睡眠分期任务临床决策支持系统：以用户为中心的设计和评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 19;24(1):e28659. doi: 10.2196/28659.
9
Intention to adopt clinical decision support systems in a developing country: effect of physician's perceived professional autonomy, involvement and belief: a cross-sectional study.意向在发展中国家采用临床决策支持系统：医生感知的专业自主性、参与度和信念的影响：一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Dec 5;12:142. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-142.
10
Acceptance, Barriers, and Facilitators to Implementing Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems in Emergency Departments: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation.急诊科实施基于人工智能的决策支持系统的接受度、障碍与促进因素：定量与定性评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 13;6(6):e36501. doi: 10.2196/36501.
引用本文的文献
1
Digital clinical decision support to improve care and to save costs: a pilot survey of the views of frontline healthcare professionals.数字临床决策支持以改善医疗并节省成本：一线医疗保健专业人员观点的试点调查
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2025 Feb 24;38(3):229-232. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2465055. eCollection 2025.
2
Chinese colposcopists' attitudes toward the colposcopic artificial intelligence auxiliary diagnostic system (CAIADS): A nation-wide, multi-center survey.中国阴道镜医师对阴道镜人工智能辅助诊断系统（CAIADS）的态度：一项全国性、多中心调查。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241279952. doi: 10.1177/20552076241279952. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Doctors' perception on the ethical use of AI-enabled clinical decision support systems for antibiotic prescribing recommendations in Singapore.医生对新加坡抗生素处方推荐中使用人工智能支持的临床决策支持系统的伦理看法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;12:1420032. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420032. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of COVID-19 on glaucoma management: A review.2019冠状病毒病对青光眼治疗的影响：综述
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 28;2:1003653. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2022.1003653. eCollection 2022.
5
Exploring the feasibility of an artificial intelligence based clinical decision support system for cutaneous melanoma detection in primary care - a mixed method study.探索基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统在初级保健中用于皮肤黑色素瘤检测的可行性——一项混合方法研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Mar;42(1):51-60. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2283190. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
Physicians' Perspectives on AI in Clinical Decision Support Systems: Interview Study of the CURATE.AI Personalized Dose Optimization Platform.医生对临床决策支持系统中人工智能的看法：对 CURATE.AI 个性化剂量优化平台的访谈研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Oct 30;10:e48476. doi: 10.2196/48476.
7
Identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping review.识别医院中成功实施计算机临床决策支持系统的障碍和促进因素：一个基于 NASSS 框架的范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2023 Jul 26;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01287-y.
8
Learning meaningful latent space representations for patient risk stratification: Model development and validation for dengue and other acute febrile illness.学习用于患者风险分层的有意义潜在空间表示：登革热和其他急性发热性疾病的模型开发与验证
Front Digit Health. 2023 Feb 22;5:1057467. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1057467. eCollection 2023.
9
The voice of healthcare: introducing digital decision support systems into clinical practice - a qualitative study.医疗保健的声音：将数字决策支持系统引入临床实践 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 13;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02024-6.
10
Stakeholder Perspectives of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.利益相关者对临床人工智能实施的观点：定性证据的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 10;25:e39742. doi: 10.2196/39742.
本文引用的文献
1
The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机化决策支持系统对心血管风险因素的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0824-x.
2
Unintended adverse consequences of a clinical decision support system: two cases.临床决策支持系统的意外不良后果：两例。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):564-567. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx096.
3
The Effects of Clinical Decision Support Systems on Medication Safety: An Overview.临床决策支持系统对用药安全的影响：综述
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0167683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167683. eCollection 2016.
4
What makes a good clinical app? Introducing the RCP Health Informatics Unit checklist.怎样才算一款优秀的临床应用程序？介绍皇家内科医师学会健康信息学部门的检查表。
Clin Med (Lond). 2015 Dec;15(6):519-21. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-6-519.
5
Computerised provider order entry combined with clinical decision support systems to improve medication safety: a narrative review.计算机化医嘱录入与临床决策支持系统相结合以提高用药安全性：叙述性综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep;23(9):773-80. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002165. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
6
Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta-regression of 162 randomised trials.有效计算机化临床决策支持系统的特征：162 项随机试验的荟萃回归分析。
BMJ. 2013 Feb 14;346:f657. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f657.
7
Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings.临床决策支持系统对医师表现和患者结局的影响：高质量系统评价结果的综合分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):327-34. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000094. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
8
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.计算机化临床决策支持系统对从业者表现和患者结局的影响：一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
9
Nervous about artificial neural networks?
Lancet. 1995 Nov 4;346(8984):1175-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92893-6.
10
An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems.关于基于计算机的临床咨询系统的医生态度分析。
Comput Biomed Res. 1981 Dec;14(6):542-58. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(81)90012-4.
Zotero 插件