Casa Cura Policlinico, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Milan, Italy.
Casa Cura Policlinico, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Milan, Italy.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Aug;101(8):1367-1376. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 May 15.
To analyze the nature of the interaction between motor and language recovery in patients with motor impairment and aphasia following left hemispheric stroke and to investigate prognostic factors of best recovery, that is, the significant recovery of both functions simultaneously.
Retrospective cohort study.
Specialized inpatient rehabilitation facility.
Patients (N=435) with left hemispheric stroke in the postacute phase with motor impairment and aphasia.
Not applicable.
Patients who reached the minimal clinically important difference in the motor-FIM (M-FIM) were classified as motor responders, patients who reached a significant change in Aachen Aphasia Test were classified as language responders, and patients who reached a simultaneous and significant improvement in both functions were classified as motor and language responders.
Of the sample 45% were motor responders, 58% were language responders, and 35% were motor and language responders. Responder groups showed lower motor impairment and less severe aphasia at admission and greater improvement in both functions at discharge compared with nonresponder groups. Premorbid autonomy, dysphagia, apraxia, and number of rehabilitative sessions were also significantly different between groups. A logistic regression model identified M-FIM, repetition abilities, and number of sessions of speech and language therapy as independent predictors of best response (ie, motor and language responders).
This study provides evidence about a possible interaction between motor and language recovery after stroke. The improvement in one function was never associated with deterioration in the other. The results actually suggest a synergic effect between the amelioration of the 2 functions, with an overall increased efficiency when the 2 recovery pathways are combined.
分析左半球卒中后运动障碍伴失语症患者运动和语言恢复之间相互作用的性质,并探讨最佳恢复(即两种功能同时显著恢复)的预后因素。
回顾性队列研究。
专门的住院康复机构。
左半球卒中后亚急性期伴运动障碍和失语症的患者(N=435)。
不适用。
达到运动性 FIM(M-FIM)最小临床重要差异的患者被归类为运动反应者,达到 Aachen 失语症测试显著变化的患者被归类为语言反应者,同时达到两种功能同时显著改善的患者被归类为运动和语言反应者。
在样本中,45%为运动反应者,58%为语言反应者,35%为运动和语言反应者。与无反应者相比,反应者组在入院时运动障碍程度较低,失语症严重程度较低,出院时两种功能的改善程度更大。发病前的自主性、吞咽困难、失用症和康复治疗次数也在组间存在显著差异。逻辑回归模型确定 M-FIM、重复能力以及言语和语言治疗的治疗次数为最佳反应(即运动和语言反应者)的独立预测因素。
本研究提供了卒中后运动和语言恢复之间可能存在相互作用的证据。一种功能的改善从未与另一种功能的恶化相关。实际上,结果表明这两种功能的改善之间存在协同效应,当两种恢复途径相结合时,整体效率会提高。