Käsmann Lukas, Eze Chukwuka, Taugner Julian, Roengvoraphoj Olarn, Belka Claus, Manapov Farkhad
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Apr;9(2):288-293. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.25.
Durvalumab as maintenance treatment after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has become the standard of care in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this nationwide survey, we solicited members of the German Radiation Oncology Society to review the current distribution and clinical settings of durvalumab treatment after cCRT, observed side effects and summarize follow-up management.
We surveyed radiation oncology institutions in Germany via an anonymous online questionnaire sent by e-mail to all members of the German Radiation Oncology Society which agreed their willingness to participate.
We received a total of 255 responses (response rate: 18%). Of which 203 (80%) were completed and returned and thus eligible for further evaluation. The respondents work in 87 different cities and 44% in a private medical practice, 29% in university and 22% in a general hospital. Durvalumab was implemented in clinical routine by 70% of respondents. Major reasons for failed implementation in clinical practice reported by the respondents were patient's ineligibility (42%), lack of required PD-L1 status (25%), decision of medical oncologists (7%) or absence of updated German guidelines (7%). Thirty-six percent of all respondents report low (≤30%) PD-L1 testing before cCRT based on IHC assay. No respondent had applied durvalumab in less than 14 days after the completion of CRT. Severe side effects requiring hospital admission in more than 10% of all patients were reported by 12% of all respondents.
Durvalumab maintenance is already implemented in the radiation oncology community and administered by the absolute majority of respondents. Low testing rates of PD-L1 at initial diagnosis were observed and should be considered a major barrier to universal adoption and integration in the clinical work-flow in countries with durvalumab approval restricted to PD-L1 positive patients. No respondent applies durvalumab in less than 14 days after cCRT.
度伐利尤单抗作为铂类同步放化疗(cCRT)后的维持治疗已成为不可切除的Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗方案。在这项全国性调查中,我们邀请德国放射肿瘤学会的成员回顾cCRT后度伐利尤单抗治疗的当前分布和临床情况,观察到的副作用并总结随访管理。
我们通过电子邮件向德国放射肿瘤学会所有同意参与的成员发送匿名在线问卷,对德国的放射肿瘤机构进行了调查。
我们共收到255份回复(回复率:18%)。其中203份(80%)填写完整并返回,因此有资格进行进一步评估。受访者在87个不同城市工作,44%在私人医疗诊所,29%在大学,22%在综合医院。70%的受访者在临床常规中使用度伐利尤单抗。受访者报告在临床实践中实施失败的主要原因是患者不符合条件(42%)、缺乏所需的PD-L1状态(25%)、医学肿瘤学家的决定(7%)或德国指南未更新(7%)。所有受访者中有36%报告基于免疫组化检测在cCRT前PD-L1检测率低(≤30%)。没有受访者在CRT完成后不到14天内应用度伐利尤单抗。所有受访者中有12%报告超过10%的患者出现需要住院治疗的严重副作用。
度伐利尤单抗维持治疗已在放射肿瘤学界实施,绝大多数受访者都在使用。观察到初始诊断时PD-L1检测率较低,在度伐利尤单抗批准仅限于PD-L1阳性患者的国家,这应被视为普遍采用和纳入临床工作流程的主要障碍。没有受访者在cCRT后不到14天内应用度伐利尤单抗。