• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农民对可持续性标准的接受程度——来自德国的实证证据。

Acceptance of sustainability standards by farmers - empirical evidence from Germany.

机构信息

Technical University of Munich, Production and Resource Economics, TUM School of Management and TUM School of Life Sciences, Alte Akademie 14, 85354, Freising, Germany.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 1;267:110617. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110617. Epub 2020 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110617
PMID:32421667
Abstract

We use a discrete choice experiment to investigate the willingness-to-accept a sustainability standard by German farmers. We also evaluate how attributes in standard design increase acceptance. The estimation of a latent class logit model results in two groups of farmers differentiated with respect to attitude, risk perception, age, education and previous participation in agri-environmental schemes (AES). However, all respondents prefer to use the EU's Integrated Administration and Control System based data and a standard linked to AES. These findings suggest valuable insights for the design or revision of sustainability standards as part of the implementation of the European CAP in line with the European Union's CAP proposal for 2021-2027.

摘要

我们使用离散选择实验来调查德国农民对可持续性标准的接受意愿。我们还评估了标准设计中的属性如何提高接受度。潜类别逻辑模型的估计结果产生了两组农民,他们在态度、风险感知、年龄、教育和以前参与农业环境计划 (AES) 方面存在差异。然而,所有受访者都更愿意使用欧盟综合管理和控制系统的数据和与 AES 相关的标准。这些发现为可持续性标准的设计或修订提供了有价值的见解,这是实施欧洲共同农业政策的一部分,符合欧盟 2021-2027 年共同农业政策提案。

相似文献

1
Acceptance of sustainability standards by farmers - empirical evidence from Germany.农民对可持续性标准的接受程度——来自德国的实证证据。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 1;267:110617. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110617. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
Data on farmers' perception and acceptance of sustainability standards.关于农民对可持续性标准的认知与接受情况的数据。
Data Brief. 2020 Aug 31;32:106250. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Farmers' valuation of incentives to produce genetically modified organism-free milk: Insights from a discrete choice experiment in Germany.农民对生产不含转基因生物牛奶的激励措施的估值:来自德国一项离散选择实验的见解
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Nov;98(11):7498-509. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9515. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
4
Farmers' preferences for adopting on-farm concentration of raw milk: Results from a discrete choice experiment in Germany.农民对采用农场集中处理生奶的偏好:来自德国的离散选择实验结果。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Apr;105(4):3176-3191. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20528. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
Improving Agri-environmental Schemes: Suggestions from Farmers and Nature Managers in a Central European Region.改善农业环境计划:中欧地区农民和自然管理者的建议。
Environ Manage. 2024 Apr;73(4):826-840. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01922-w. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
6
Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland.参与农业环境计划:爱尔兰农民的条件价值评估研究。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 15;262:110243. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110243. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Data on farmers' acceptance of results-based agri-environmental schemes.农民对基于结果的农业环境计划的接受度数据。
Data Brief. 2022 Sep 27;45:108642. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108642. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Analysis of farmers' willingness to participate in pasture grazing programs: Results from a discrete choice experiment with German dairy farmers.农户参与草地放牧项目意愿分析:基于德国奶农的离散选择实验结果
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Sep;100(9):7569-7580. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12756. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
9
European convergence towards higher standards in dental education: the DentEd Thematic Network Project.欧洲牙科教育向更高标准的趋同:DentEd主题网络项目
Med Educ. 2002 Feb;36(2):186-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01125.x.
10
Effects of a coordinated farmland bird conservation project on farmers' intentions to implement nature conservation practices - Evidence from the Swedish Volunteer & Farmer Alliance.一项农田鸟类协同保护项目对农民实施自然保护措施意愿的影响——来自瑞典志愿者与农民联盟的证据
J Environ Manage. 2017 Feb 1;187:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.026. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Think and Choose! The Dual Impact of Label Information and Consumer Attitudes on the Choice of a Plant-Based Analog.思考与选择!标签信息和消费者态度对植物基替代品选择的双重影响。
Foods. 2024 Jul 18;13(14):2269. doi: 10.3390/foods13142269.
2
Farmers' Willingness to Participate in a Carbon Sequestration Program - A Discrete Choice Experiment.农民参与碳封存计划的意愿——离散选择实验。
Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;74(2):332-349. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01963-9. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
3
Factors Affecting Green Agricultural Production Financing Behavior in Heilongjiang Family Farms: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.
影响黑龙江家庭农场绿色农业生产融资行为的因素:基于结构方程模型的方法
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 9;12:692140. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692140. eCollection 2021.
4
Data on farmers' perception and acceptance of sustainability standards.关于农民对可持续性标准的认知与接受情况的数据。
Data Brief. 2020 Aug 31;32:106250. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250. eCollection 2020 Oct.