• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项复杂的区域预先医疗照护计划干预措施以提高与照护偏好的一致性的效果:一项多中心、整群随机对照试验的研究方案,重点关注养老院居民(BEVOR 试验)。

Effectiveness of a complex regional advance care planning intervention to improve care consistency with care preferences: study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized controlled trial focusing on nursing home residents (BEVOR trial).

机构信息

Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Department of Palliative Medicine, Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2022 Sep 12;23(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06576-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06576-3
PMID:36096948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9465132/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to recent legislation, facilitated advance care planning (ACP) for nursing home (NH) residents is covered by German sickness funds. However, the effects of ACP on patient-relevant outcomes have not been studied in Germany yet. This study investigates whether implementing a complex regional ACP intervention improves care consistency with care preferences in NH residents.

METHODS

This is a parallel-group cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) with 48 NHs (≈ 3840 resident beds) between 09/2019 and 02/2023. The intervention group will receive a complex, regional ACP intervention aiming at sustainable systems redesign at all levels (individual, institutional, regional). The intervention comprises comprehensive training of ACP facilitators, implementation of reliable ACP processes, organizational development in the NH and other relevant institutions of the regional healthcare system, and education of health professionals caring for the residents. Control group NHs will deliver care as usual. Primary outcome is the hospitalization rate during the 12-months observation period. Secondary outcomes include the rate of residents whose preferences were known and honored in potentially life-threatening events, hospital days, index treatments like resuscitation and artificial ventilation, advance directives, quality of life, psychological burden on bereaved families, and costs of care. The NHs will provide anonymous, aggregated data of all their residents on the primary outcome and several secondary outcomes (data collection 1). For residents who have given informed consent, we will evaluate care consistency with care preferences and further secondary outcomes, based on chart reviews and short interviews with residents, surrogates, and carers (data collection 2). Process evaluation will aim to explain barriers and facilitators, economic evaluation the cost implications.

DISCUSSION

This study has the potential for high-quality evidence on the effects of a complex regional ACP intervention on NH residents, their families and surrogates, NH staff, and health care utilization in Germany. It is the first cRCT investigating a comprehensive regional ACP intervention that aims at improving patient-relevant clinical outcomes, addressing and educating multiple institutions and health care providers, besides qualification of ACP facilitators. Thereby, it can generate evidence on the potential of ACP to effectively promote patient-centered care in the vulnerable population of frail and often chronically ill elderly.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04333303 . Registered 30 March 2020.

摘要

背景

根据最近的立法,为养老院(NH)居民提供便利的预先护理计划(ACP)已被德国医保覆盖。然而,ACP 对患者相关结局的影响在德国尚未得到研究。本研究旨在探讨实施复杂的区域性 ACP 干预是否能提高 NH 居民护理的一致性,使其与护理偏好相符。

方法

这是一项在 2019 年 9 月至 2023 年 2 月期间进行的平行组聚类随机对照试验(cRCT),共有 48 家 NH(约 3840 张床位)参与。干预组将接受一项复杂的区域性 ACP 干预,旨在各级别(个人、机构、地区)实现可持续的系统重新设计。该干预包括全面培训 ACP 促进者、实施可靠的 ACP 流程、在 NH 及区域医疗系统的其他相关机构开展组织发展、以及对照顾居民的卫生专业人员进行教育。对照组的 NH 将提供常规护理。主要结局是 12 个月观察期内的住院率。次要结局包括在潜在危及生命的事件中,已知和尊重居民偏好的居民比例、住院天数、复苏和人工通气等指数治疗、预先指示、生活质量、丧亲家庭的心理负担,以及护理成本。NH 将提供所有居民的主要结局和若干次要结局的匿名、汇总数据(数据收集 1)。对于已给予知情同意的居民,我们将基于病历回顾和对居民、代理人和照顾者的简短访谈,评估护理与偏好的一致性和其他次要结局(数据收集 2)。过程评估旨在解释障碍和促进因素,经济评估则关注成本影响。

讨论

本研究有潜力提供高质量证据,说明复杂的区域性 ACP 干预对德国 NH 居民、其家属和代理人、NH 工作人员以及医疗保健利用的影响。这是第一项调查全面区域性 ACP 干预的 cRCT,该干预旨在改善患者相关的临床结局,涉及并教育多个机构和卫生保健提供者,同时也对 ACP 促进者进行培训。因此,它可以为 ACP 有效促进弱势人群(体弱且经常患有慢性病的老年人)的以患者为中心的护理提供证据。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT04333303。于 2020 年 3 月 30 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/9465856/aa94a1a90821/13063_2022_6576_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/9465856/5646f948f443/13063_2022_6576_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/9465856/04eabd9bad2f/13063_2022_6576_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/9465856/aa94a1a90821/13063_2022_6576_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/9465856/5646f948f443/13063_2022_6576_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/9465856/04eabd9bad2f/13063_2022_6576_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/9465856/aa94a1a90821/13063_2022_6576_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a complex regional advance care planning intervention to improve care consistency with care preferences: study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized controlled trial focusing on nursing home residents (BEVOR trial).一项复杂的区域预先医疗照护计划干预措施以提高与照护偏好的一致性的效果:一项多中心、整群随机对照试验的研究方案,重点关注养老院居民(BEVOR 试验)。
Trials. 2022 Sep 12;23(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06576-3.
2
Implementing the theory-based advance care planning ACP+ programme for nursing homes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation.实施基于理论的养老机构预先医疗照护计划(ACP+)方案:一项群组随机对照试验及过程评价的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jan 8;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0505-7.
3
Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation.养老院中预先医疗照护计划干预的描述:过程评估结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0713-7.
4
Study on advance care planning in care dependent community-dwelling older persons in Germany (STADPLAN): protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial.德国依赖护理社区居住老年人的预先护理计划研究(STADPLAN):一项群组随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01537-4.
5
Implementation of advance care planning in the routine care for acutely admitted patients in geriatric units: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.在老年病房急性入院患者的常规护理中实施预先护理计划:一项整群随机对照试验的方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10666-0.
6
A complex regional intervention to implement advance care planning in one town's nursing homes: Protocol of a controlled inter-regional study.一项在一个城镇的养老院实施预先护理计划的复杂区域干预措施:一项对照性区域间研究的方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 24;11:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-14.
7
Effect of an interprofessional care concept on the hospitalization of nursing home residents: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.跨专业护理理念对养老院居民住院的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 May 18;21(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04325-y.
8
The design and conduct of a pragmatic cluster randomized trial of an advance care planning program for nursing home residents with dementia.一项针对痴呆养老院居民的预先护理计划的实用群组随机试验的设计与实施。
Clin Trials. 2022 Dec;19(6):623-635. doi: 10.1177/17407745221108992. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
9
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting.实施一项实用临床试验以改善养老院环境中的预先护理计划的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4309-5.
10
Implementing advance care planning in nursing homes - study protocol of a cluster-randomized clinical trial.在养老院实施预先医疗照护计划 - 一项群组随机临床试验研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0869-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Training supported by simulated persons to promote the development of specific communication skills in advance care planning.由模拟人物提供支持的培训,以促进预先护理计划中特定沟通技能的发展。
GMS J Med Educ. 2025 Feb 17;42(1):Doc11. doi: 10.3205/zma001735. eCollection 2025.
2
[What really matters can't be planned ahead : Impediments for advance care planning from a qualitative study on very old people living alone].[真正重要的事情无法提前规划:一项关于独居老人的定性研究中预先护理规划的障碍]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s00391-025-02414-8.
3
Hospitalizations, emergency medical care utilization, and contacts with the regional on-call medical services among nursing home residents in Germany: a cross-sectional study in 44 nursing homes.

本文引用的文献

1
Advance care plans in UK care home residents: a service evaluation using a stepped wedge design.英国养老院居民的预先护理计划:使用阶梯式楔形设计进行的服务评估。
Age Ageing. 2022 Mar 1;51(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac069.
2
What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?预先护理规划存在什么问题?
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1575-1576. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16430.
3
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
德国养老院居民的住院情况、急诊医疗服务利用情况以及与地区随叫随到医疗服务的接触情况:对44家养老院的横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12342-3.
4
Models for delivery and co-ordination of primary or secondary health care (or both) to older adults living in aged care facilities.为居住在老年护理机构中的老年人提供初级或二级医疗保健(或两者兼顾)的交付和协调模型。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 1;3(3):CD013880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013880.pub2.
5
[Nursing home-sensitive conditions and approaches to reduce hospitalization of nursing home residents].[养老院敏感状况及减少养老院居民住院率的方法]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Feb;66(2):199-211. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03654-4. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
4
Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.复杂干预措施的制定和评估框架:差距分析、研讨会和咨询知情更新。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(57):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta25570.
5
Advance care planning by proxy in German nursing homes: Descriptive analysis and policy implications.代理在德国家庭养老院进行预先护理计划:描述性分析与政策含义。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Aug;69(8):2122-2131. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17147. Epub 2021 May 5.
6
Advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer: A 6-country, cluster-randomised clinical trial.晚期癌症患者的预先医疗照护计划:一项六国、群组随机临床试验。
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 13;17(11):e1003422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003422. eCollection 2020 Nov.
7
Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review.剖析预先医疗照护计划结果的复杂性:我们了解什么,又该往何处去? 范围性回顾。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jan;69(1):234-244. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16801. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
8
Implementing advance care planning in routine nursing home care: The development of the theory-based ACP+ program.在常规养老院护理中实施预先护理计划:基于理论的 ACP+ 计划的发展。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223586. eCollection 2019.
9
Implementing advance care planning with community-dwelling frail elders requires a system-wide approach: An integrative review applying a behaviour change model.实施社区居住的体弱老年人的预先护理计划需要系统的方法:应用行为改变模型的综合审查。
Palliat Med. 2019 Jul;33(7):743-756. doi: 10.1177/0269216319845804. Epub 2019 May 6.
10
Advance care planning for the severely ill in the hospital: a randomized trial.医院重症患者的预先医疗护理计划:一项随机试验。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 21;12(e3):e411-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001489.