Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity production by mono-crystalline solar systems: a case study in Canada.

Photovoltaic (PV) system is widely recognized as one of the cleanest technologies for electricity production, which transforms solar energy into electrical energy. However, there are considerable amounts of emissions during its life cycle. In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to evaluate the environmental and human health impacts of PV electricity production in Canada. The PV potential varies considerably among the provinces, with higher values in Manitoba (MB), Saskatchewan (SK), Alberta (AB), and southern Ontario (ON). A grid-connected slanted-roof mono-crystalline silicon (mono-Si) PV system with a capacity of 3 kWp (the peak power of the system in kilowatts) in Toronto, Ontario, was considered as the case study system. Ten impact categories were considered including (1) acidification, (2) carcinogenic, (3) ecotoxicity, (4) eutrophication, (5) fossil fuel depletion, (6) global warming, (7) non-carcinogenic, (8) ozone depletion, (9) respiratory effects, and (10) smog. Among the four components of the PV system, i.e., mono-Si panel, mounting system, inverter, and electric installation, the mono-Si panel production was the highest contributor in seven out of ten impact categories, including acidification (68%), eutrophication (60%), fossil fuel depletion (81%), global warming (77%), ozone depletion (88%), respiratory effects (74%), and smog (70%). For the other three processes, the electric installation contributed most to ecotoxicity at 58%, followed by the mounting system in the carcinogenic category (29%), and the inverter in the non-carcinogenic category (31%). By normalizing the impacts based on the reference scores in Canada, it was found that the ecotoxicity and carcinogenic categories had dominant contributions to the overall impact by 53% and 42%, respectively. The global warming potential impact was estimated as 79 gr CO eq /kWh, which is close to the mean value of 79.5 gr CO eq /kWh, reported in the literature. The sensitivity analysis indicated that a 10% increase in the panel and mounting system area will increase the ozone depletion and carcinogenic categories by 8.1% and 2.8%, respectively.