• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优先考虑海洋保护的债务转换机会。

Prioritizing debt conversion opportunities for marine conservation.

机构信息

The Nature Conservancy, 4245 Fairfax Dr #100, Arlington, VA, 22203, U.S.A.

NatureVest, The Nature Conservancy, 4245 Fairfax Dr #100, Arlington, VA, 22203, U.S.A.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2020 Oct;34(5):1065-1075. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13540. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1111/cobi.13540
PMID:32424907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8129986/
Abstract

Incentivized debt conversion is a financing mechanism that can assist countries with a heavy debt burden to bolster their long-term domestic investment in nature conservation. The Nature Conservancy, an international conservation-based nongovernmental organization, is adapting debt conversions to support marine conservation efforts by small island developing states and coastal countries. Prioritizing debt conversion opportunities according to their potential return on investment can increase the impact and effectiveness of this finance mechanism. We developed guidance on how to do so with a decision-support approach that relies on a novel threat-based adaptation of cost-effectiveness analysis. We constructed scenarios by varying parameters of the approach, including enabling conditions, expected benefits, and threat classifications. Incorporating both abatable and unabatable threats affected priorities across planning scenarios. Similarly, differences in scenario construction resulted in unique solution sets for top priorities. We show how environmental organizations, private entities, and investment banks can adopt structured prioritization frameworks for making decisions about conservation finance investments, such as debt conversions. Our guidance can accommodate a suite of social, ecological, and economic considerations, making the approach broadly applicable to other conservation finance mechanisms or investment strategies that seek to establish a transparent process for return-on-investment decision-making.

摘要

激励性债务转换是一种融资机制,可以帮助债务负担沉重的国家增加其在自然保护方面的国内长期投资。国际以自然保护为基础的非政府组织大自然保护协会正在调整债务转换,以支持小岛屿发展中国家和沿海国家的海洋保护工作。根据潜在投资回报对债务转换机会进行优先排序,可以提高这种融资机制的影响力和效果。我们采用了一种依赖于基于成本效益分析的新颖威胁适应的决策支持方法,制定了如何进行这种排序的指南。我们通过改变方法的参数来构建情景,包括使能条件、预期收益和威胁分类。同时考虑可避免和不可避免的威胁,会影响整个规划情景的优先级。同样,情景构建的差异也导致了优先级的独特解决方案集。我们展示了环境组织、私人实体和投资银行如何采用结构化的优先级排序框架,为保护金融投资(如债务转换)做出决策。我们的指导可以考虑一系列社会、生态和经济因素,因此该方法广泛适用于其他保护金融机制或投资策略,这些策略旨在为投资决策建立透明的投资回报机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30fb/8129986/da8082e86a4c/COBI-34-1065-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30fb/8129986/da8082e86a4c/COBI-34-1065-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30fb/8129986/da8082e86a4c/COBI-34-1065-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prioritizing debt conversion opportunities for marine conservation.优先考虑海洋保护的债务转换机会。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Oct;34(5):1065-1075. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13540. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
2
Prioritizing species conservation programs based on IUCN Green Status and estimates of cost-sharing potential.根据 IUCN 绿色状况和成本分担潜力估计,优先考虑物种保护计划。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Jun;37(3):e14051. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14051. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
3
Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.慈善事业对确定生物多样性保护资金分配的限制。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Feb;30(1):206-15. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12608. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
4
Effects of threat management interactions on conservation priorities.威胁管理交互作用对保护优先级的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Dec;29(6):1626-35. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12551. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
5
Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.风险规避对保护项目优先级排序的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):513-24. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12386. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
6
Informed actions: where to cost effectively manage multiple threats to species to maximize return on investment.明智的行动:在何处以具有成本效益的方式管理对物种的多种威胁,以实现投资回报最大化。
Ecol Appl. 2014;24(6):1357-73. doi: 10.1890/13-0711.1.
7
Reallocating budgets among ongoing and emerging conservation projects.在正在进行的和新出现的保护项目之间重新分配预算。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Jun;35(3):955-966. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13585. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
8
Rapidly assessing cobenefits to advance threat-management alliances.快速评估共同效益以推进威胁管理联盟。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Aug;34(4):843-853. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13490. Epub 2020 May 14.
9
Quantifying biases in marine-protected-area placement relative to abatable threats.量化海洋保护区设置相对于可避免威胁的偏差。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Dec;33(6):1350-1359. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13340. Epub 2019 May 27.
10
Allocating resources for land protection using continuous optimization: biodiversity conservation in the United States.利用连续优化分配土地保护资源:美国的生物多样性保护。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Sep;30(6):e02118. doi: 10.1002/eap.2118. Epub 2020 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Prioritizing actions: spatial action maps for conservation.优先行动:保护的空间行动图。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Dec;1505(1):118-141. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14651. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
2
Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate.保护全球海洋生物多样性、粮食和气候。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7854):397-402. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying biases in marine-protected-area placement relative to abatable threats.量化海洋保护区设置相对于可避免威胁的偏差。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Dec;33(6):1350-1359. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13340. Epub 2019 May 27.
2
Informed actions: where to cost effectively manage multiple threats to species to maximize return on investment.明智的行动:在何处以具有成本效益的方式管理对物种的多种威胁,以实现投资回报最大化。
Ecol Appl. 2014;24(6):1357-73. doi: 10.1890/13-0711.1.
3
Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally.能力短缺阻碍了全球海洋保护区的运行。
Nature. 2017 Mar 30;543(7647):665-669. doi: 10.1038/nature21708. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
4
Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity.全球保护区网络在保护海洋生物多样性方面存在不足。
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 3;5:17539. doi: 10.1038/srep17539.
5
A decision framework for prioritizing multiple management actions for threatened marine megafauna.用于优先考虑受威胁海洋巨型动物的多种管理措施的决策框架。
Ecol Appl. 2015 Jan;25(1):200-14. doi: 10.1890/13-1524.1.
6
Effective conservation requires clear objectives and prioritizing actions, not places or species.有效的保护需要明确的目标并对行动进行优先排序,而不是针对地点或物种。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 11;112(32):E4342. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509189112. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
7
Priority threat management of invasive animals to protect biodiversity under climate change.优先威胁管理入侵动物以保护气候变化下的生物多样性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Nov;21(11):3917-30. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13034. Epub 2015 Aug 9.
8
Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world's ocean.人类对全球海洋累积影响的时空变化。
Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 14;6:7615. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8615.
9
Benefits of integrating complementarity into priority threat management.将互补性纳入优先威胁管理的好处。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):525-36. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12413. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
10
Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.风险规避对保护项目优先级排序的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):513-24. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12386. Epub 2014 Oct 18.