Martens Thomas, Niemann Moritz, Dick Uwe
Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Institute of Information Systems, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 30;11:379. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00379. eCollection 2020.
The aim of this study was to predict self-report data for self-regulated learning with sensor data. In a longitudinal study multichannel data were collected: self-report data with questionnaires and embedded experience samples as well as sensor data like electrodermal activity (EDA) and electroencephalography (EEG). 100 students from a private university in Germany performed a learning experiment followed by final measures of intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy and gained knowledge. During the learning experiment psychophysiological data like EEG were combined with embedded experience sampling measuring motivational states like affect and interest every 270 s. Results of machine learning models show that consumer grade wearables for EEG and EDA failed to predict embedded experience sampling. EDA failed to predict outcome measures as well. This gap can be explained by some major technical difficulties, especially by lower quality of the electrodes. Nevertheless, an average activation of all EEG bands at T7 (left-hemispheric, lateral) can predict lower intrinsic motivation as outcome measure. This is in line with the personality system interactions (PSI) theory of Julius Kuhl. With more advanced sensor measures it might be possible to track affective learning in an unobtrusive way and support micro-adaptation in a digital learning environment.
本研究的目的是利用传感器数据预测自我调节学习的自我报告数据。在一项纵向研究中,收集了多通道数据:通过问卷调查和嵌入式体验样本收集的自我报告数据,以及诸如皮肤电活动(EDA)和脑电图(EEG)等传感器数据。德国一所私立大学的100名学生进行了一项学习实验,随后对内在动机、自我效能感和所学知识进行了最终测量。在学习实验期间,脑电图等心理生理数据与每270秒测量一次情感和兴趣等动机状态的嵌入式体验抽样相结合。机器学习模型的结果表明,用于脑电图和皮肤电活动的消费级可穿戴设备无法预测嵌入式体验抽样。皮肤电活动也无法预测结果指标。这一差距可以用一些主要的技术难题来解释,尤其是电极质量较低的问题。然而,T7(左半球,外侧)处所有脑电频段的平均激活可以预测较低的内在动机作为结果指标。这与朱利叶斯·库尔的人格系统交互作用(PSI)理论一致。随着更先进的传感器测量技术的出现,有可能以不引人注意的方式跟踪情感学习,并支持数字学习环境中的微适应。