Suppr超能文献

动态形状范式的常模数据与信度

Normative Data and Reliability of the Moving Shapes Paradigm.

作者信息

Shahrivar Zahra, Tehrani-Doost Mehdi, Khorrami Banaraki Anahita, Mohammadzadeh Azar

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Research Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;15(2):143-149.

Abstract

Moving Shapes paradigm is a test that evaluates intentionality as a theory of mind (ToM) component. This study aimed to assess the normative data and reliability of this test in a community sample of 9-11-year-old children. A total of 398 children aged between 9 and 11 years were recruited from mainstream elementary schools through a random cluster sampling. All participants were evaluated using the Moving Shapes paradigm. To evaluate test-retest reliability, the test was administered again after 2-4 weeks. The intentionality mean score was 29.70 (+5.88) out of 60. There was no significant difference between girls and boys in test scores. Age was not significantly related to the paradigm variables scores. Ten percent of the participants achieved the scores below 22, and 10% above 37. Cronbach's Alfa was 0.40 for the intentionality score. The test-retest reliability was fair to good (0.43 - 0.79) for different groups of animations. The inter-rater agreement was 80%. The study found that the Moving shapes paradigm is a reliable instrument to evaluate intentionality in normal school-aged children

摘要

移动形状范式是一种评估作为心理理论(ToM)组成部分的意向性的测试。本研究旨在评估该测试在9至11岁儿童社区样本中的常模数据和可靠性。 通过随机整群抽样从主流小学招募了398名年龄在9至11岁之间的儿童。所有参与者都使用移动形状范式进行评估。为了评估重测可靠性,在2至4周后再次进行测试。 意向性平均得分在60分中为29.70(+5.88)。测试分数在女孩和男孩之间没有显著差异。年龄与范式变量分数没有显著相关。10%的参与者得分低于22分,10%的参与者得分高于37分。意向性得分的克朗巴赫阿尔法系数为0.40。不同动画组的重测可靠性为中等至良好(0.43 - 0.79)。评分者间一致性为80%。研究发现,移动形状范式是评估正常学龄儿童意向性的可靠工具。

相似文献

6
Understanding intentionality in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.理解注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童的意向性。
Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2016 Jun;8(2):73-8. doi: 10.1007/s12402-015-0187-9. Epub 2015 Nov 27.

本文引用的文献

2
[Mentalization and theory of mind].[心理化与心理理论]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2014;63(9):730-7. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2014.63.9.730.
6
Theory of mind and neurodevelopmental disorders of childhood.心理理论与儿童神经发育障碍。
Pediatr Res. 2011 May;69(5 Pt 2):101R-8R. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318212c177.
7
Representing metarepresentations: is there theory of mind-specific cognition?
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar;18(1):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
8
Fetal testosterone and empathy.胎儿睾酮与同理心。
Horm Behav. 2006 Mar;49(3):282-92. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.08.010. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
9
Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks.心理理论任务的量表编制。
Child Dev. 2004 Mar-Apr;75(2):523-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验