• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态形状范式的常模数据与信度

Normative Data and Reliability of the Moving Shapes Paradigm.

作者信息

Shahrivar Zahra, Tehrani-Doost Mehdi, Khorrami Banaraki Anahita, Mohammadzadeh Azar

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Research Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;15(2):143-149.

PMID:32426010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7215251/
Abstract

Moving Shapes paradigm is a test that evaluates intentionality as a theory of mind (ToM) component. This study aimed to assess the normative data and reliability of this test in a community sample of 9-11-year-old children. A total of 398 children aged between 9 and 11 years were recruited from mainstream elementary schools through a random cluster sampling. All participants were evaluated using the Moving Shapes paradigm. To evaluate test-retest reliability, the test was administered again after 2-4 weeks. The intentionality mean score was 29.70 (+5.88) out of 60. There was no significant difference between girls and boys in test scores. Age was not significantly related to the paradigm variables scores. Ten percent of the participants achieved the scores below 22, and 10% above 37. Cronbach's Alfa was 0.40 for the intentionality score. The test-retest reliability was fair to good (0.43 - 0.79) for different groups of animations. The inter-rater agreement was 80%. The study found that the Moving shapes paradigm is a reliable instrument to evaluate intentionality in normal school-aged children

摘要

移动形状范式是一种评估作为心理理论(ToM)组成部分的意向性的测试。本研究旨在评估该测试在9至11岁儿童社区样本中的常模数据和可靠性。 通过随机整群抽样从主流小学招募了398名年龄在9至11岁之间的儿童。所有参与者都使用移动形状范式进行评估。为了评估重测可靠性,在2至4周后再次进行测试。 意向性平均得分在60分中为29.70(+5.88)。测试分数在女孩和男孩之间没有显著差异。年龄与范式变量分数没有显著相关。10%的参与者得分低于22分,10%的参与者得分高于37分。意向性得分的克朗巴赫阿尔法系数为0.40。不同动画组的重测可靠性为中等至良好(0.43 - 0.79)。评分者间一致性为80%。研究发现,移动形状范式是评估正常学龄儿童意向性的可靠工具。

相似文献

1
Normative Data and Reliability of the Moving Shapes Paradigm.动态形状范式的常模数据与信度
Iran J Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;15(2):143-149.
2
[Studies of the norm and psychometrical properties of the ages and stages questionnaires, third edition, with a Chinese national sample].[《年龄与阶段问卷》第三版在中国全国样本中的常模及心理测量学特性研究]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;53(12):913-8.
3
Normative data and psychometric properties of a farsi translation of the strange stories test.《怪诞故事测验的波斯语翻译本的常模数据和心理测量学特性》
Autism Res. 2017 Dec;10(12):1960-1967. doi: 10.1002/aur.1844. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
4
Reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP Child's version).儿童口腔健康影响量表(儿童版)的信度、聚合效度和区分效度
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;35 Suppl 1:20-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.0002.x.
5
An articulatory-based disyllabic and trisyllabic Non-Word Repetition test: reliability and validity in Italian 3- to 7-year-old children.一种基于发音的双音节和三音节非词重复测试:在意大利3至7岁儿童中的信度和效度
Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(5):437-456. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1542542. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
6
Understanding intentionality in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.理解注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童的意向性。
Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2016 Jun;8(2):73-8. doi: 10.1007/s12402-015-0187-9. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
7
Static and dynamic standing balance: test-retest reliability and reference values in 9 to 10 year old children.静态和动态站立平衡:9至10岁儿童的重测信度及参考值
Eur J Pediatr. 2006 Nov;165(11):779-86. doi: 10.1007/s00431-006-0173-5.
8
The Community Assessment of Risk Instrument: Investigation of Inter-Rater Reliability of an Instrument Measuring Risk of Adverse Outcomes.社区风险评估工具:一种测量不良后果风险的工具的评分者间信度调查
J Frailty Aging. 2015;4(2):80-9. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2015.40.
9
Theory of mind in adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia: correlations with clinical assessment and executive functions.早发性精神分裂症青少年的心理理论:与临床评估及执行功能的相关性
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2016 Aug;28(4):232-8. doi: 10.1017/neu.2016.3. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
10
Reliability and Normative Data for the Dynamic Visual Acuity Test for Vestibular Screening.用于前庭筛查的动态视力测试的可靠性和常模数据。
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jun;37(5):545-52. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001014.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of verbal and non-verbal theory of mind abilities with non-coding variants of OXTR in youth with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing individuals: a case-control study.自闭症谱系障碍和典型发育个体中言语和非言语心理理论能力与 OXTR 非编码变异的关联:病例对照研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05461-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Normative data and psychometric properties of a farsi translation of the strange stories test.《怪诞故事测验的波斯语翻译本的常模数据和心理测量学特性》
Autism Res. 2017 Dec;10(12):1960-1967. doi: 10.1002/aur.1844. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
2
[Mentalization and theory of mind].[心理化与心理理论]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2014;63(9):730-7. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2014.63.9.730.
3
Gender and theory of mind in preschoolers' group effort: evidence for timing differences behind children's earliest social loafing.学龄前儿童群体合作中的性别与心理理论:儿童最早出现社会惰化背后时间差异的证据
J Soc Psychol. 2014 Nov-Dec;154(6):475-9. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.933763.
4
Age and gender dependent development of Theory of Mind in 6- to 8-years old children.6 至 8 岁儿童心理理论随年龄和性别发展的研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 17;7:281. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00281. eCollection 2013.
5
Silent films and strange stories: theory of mind, gender, and social experiences in middle childhood.无声电影与奇异故事:儿童中期的心理理论、性别与社会经验
Child Dev. 2013 May-Jun;84(3):989-1003. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12017. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
6
Theory of mind and neurodevelopmental disorders of childhood.心理理论与儿童神经发育障碍。
Pediatr Res. 2011 May;69(5 Pt 2):101R-8R. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318212c177.
7
Representing metarepresentations: is there theory of mind-specific cognition?
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar;18(1):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
8
Fetal testosterone and empathy.胎儿睾酮与同理心。
Horm Behav. 2006 Mar;49(3):282-92. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.08.010. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
9
Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks.心理理论任务的量表编制。
Child Dev. 2004 Mar-Apr;75(2):523-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x.
10
Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes.自闭症、阿斯伯格综合征与将心理状态归因于动画形状的大脑机制
Brain. 2002 Aug;125(Pt 8):1839-49. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf189.