Suppr超能文献

突破性过敏反应对基于钆的造影剂及降低后续反应率的策略:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Breakthrough Hypersensitivity Reactions to Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents and Strategies to Decrease Subsequent Reaction Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

From the Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Ave, Room C159, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1Y 4E9 (D.T.W., T.A.M., M.D.F.M., N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.S.D.); and Allergy and Immunology Associates of Ann Arbor PC, Ann Arbor, Mich (T.S.).

出版信息

Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):312-321. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192855. Epub 2020 May 19.

Abstract

Background Hypersensitivity reactions to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) that occur despite corticosteroid premedication (breakthrough reactions) are not well understood. Purpose To determine the GBCA breakthrough reaction rate overall and according to GBCA class and to determine the effect of using an alternative GBCA or allergy skin testing on the risk of a breakthrough reaction. Materials and Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE (from 1946 to 2019), Embase (from 1947 to 2019), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2019 only) were searched for patients with a breakthrough reaction to a GBCA who were undergoing repeat GBCA administration. Breakthrough reaction rates were determined with random-effects modeling and meta-regression. Secondary analyses of GBCA class, switching to an alternative GBCA, and allergy skin testing were assessed. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to determine risk of bias and applicability. Percentages are meta-regression results and do not directly reflect raw data. Results Of the 148 identified studies, 23 were included, encompassing 120 patients and 130 GBCA administrations. The overall breakthrough reaction rate was 39% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30%, 49%; 37 of 103 administrations). Breakthrough reaction rates for macrocyclic (36%; 95% CI: 25%, 48%; 23 of 64 administrations) and protein-binding linear (31%; 95% CI: 1%, 94%; [one of seven administrations) GBCAs did not differ ( = .90). There were insufficient analyzable data for gadodiamide, gadoversetamide, and gadopentetate. Hypersensitivity reaction rate after switching GBCAs was 50% (95% CI: 21%, 79%; three of nine administrations) with and 71% (95% CI: 21%, 95%; four of five administrations) without corticosteroid premedication, which did not differ ( = .82 and = .17, respectively) from the observed rate when using corticosteroid premedication and the same GBCA (36%; 95% CI: 26%, 48%; 37 of 84 administrations). Hypersensitivity reaction rate after allergy skin testing (17%; 95% CI: 7%, 29%; zero of 21 studies) did not differ when compared with use of the same agent with corticosteroid premedication ( = .10). Meta-analysis limitations were the small number of patients and the high risk of bias. Conclusion Patients with a prior hypersensitivity reaction to a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) often had breakthrough reactions. The effect of switching to an alternative GBCA or using allergy skin testing to decrease reaction risk lacked enough available data for meaningful comparisons. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Prince in this issue.

摘要

背景 尽管进行了皮质类固醇预治疗(突破性反应),但仍会发生对基于钆的造影剂(GBCA)的过敏反应,目前对此了解甚少。

目的 旨在确定总体 GBCA 突破性反应率,以及根据 GBCA 类别确定突破性反应率,并确定使用替代 GBCA 或过敏皮肤测试对突破性反应风险的影响。

材料与方法 在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,检索了 MEDLINE(1946 年至 2019 年)、Embase(1947 年至 2019 年)和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(仅 2019 年),以确定接受重复 GBCA 给药后发生 GBCA 突破性反应的患者。采用随机效应模型和荟萃回归确定突破性反应率。还进行了 GBCA 类别、切换至替代 GBCA 和过敏皮肤测试的次要分析。使用诊断准确性研究 2 质量评估来确定偏倚和适用性风险。百分比是荟萃回归结果,并不直接反映原始数据。

结果 在 148 项已确定的研究中,有 23 项研究被纳入,涵盖了 120 名患者和 130 次 GBCA 给药。总体突破性反应率为 39%(95%置信区间:30%,49%;103 次给药中有 37 次)。大环内酯(36%;95%置信区间:25%,48%;64 次给药中有 23 次)和蛋白结合线性(31%;95%置信区间:1%,94%;[7 次给药中有 1 次)GBCA 的突破性反应率没有差异(=0.90)。加钆喷酸葡胺、钆贝葡胺和钆喷替酸葡甲胺的分析数据不足。在使用皮质类固醇预治疗和相同 GBCA 时,GBCA 转换后的过敏反应率为 50%(95%置信区间:21%,79%;9 次给药中有 3 次),且无皮质类固醇预治疗时的过敏反应率为 71%(95%置信区间:21%,95%;5 次给药中有 4 次),两者无差异(=0.82 和=0.17)。与使用皮质类固醇预治疗和相同 GBCA 时的观察到的反应率(36%;95%置信区间:26%,48%;84 次给药中有 37 次)相比,差异无统计学意义。与使用皮质类固醇预治疗和相同药物时相比,过敏皮肤测试(17%;95%置信区间:7%,29%;21 项研究中有 0 次)后的过敏反应率无差异(=0.10)。荟萃分析的局限性是患者数量少和偏倚风险高。

结论 先前对基于钆的造影剂(GBCA)发生过敏反应的患者常发生突破性反应。改用替代 GBCA 或使用过敏皮肤测试降低反应风险的效果缺乏足够的可用数据来进行有意义的比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验