Sincer Isa, Mansiroglu Asli Kurtar, Aktas Gulali, Gunes Yilmaz, Kocak M Zahid
. Abant Izzet Baysal University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Bolu, Turkey.
. Abant Izzet Baysal University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Bolu, Turkey.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020 May 15;66(2):160-165. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.2.160.
Coronary collateral development (CCD) predicts the severity of coronary heart disease. Hemogram parameters, such as mean platelet volume (MPV), eosinophil, red cell distribution width, and platelet distribution width (PDW), are supposed novel inflammatory markers. We aimed to compare hemogram parameter values in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with adequate or inadequate CCD.
A total of 177 patients with NSTEMI undergoing coronary arteriography were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the development of CCD: one group with adequate CCD (n=88) and the other with impaired CCD (n=89).
Baseline demographics and clinical risk factors were similar between the groups. Hemogram parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. However, compared to the inadequate CCD group, the median PDW was significantly higher in the adequate CCD group, 17.6 (1.4) vs. 17.8 (1.6) p=0.004. In a multivariate analysis, PDW (p=0.001, 95% CI for OR: 0.489(0,319-0,750) was found to be significantly different in the adequate CCD group compared to the inadequate CCD group. Pearson's correlation analysis revealed that PDW was significantly correlated with the Rentrop score (r=0.26, p<0.001).
We suggest that since PDW is an index that is inexpensive and easy to assess, it could serve as a marker of CCD in patients with NSTEMI.
冠状动脉侧支循环发育(CCD)可预测冠心病的严重程度。血常规参数,如平均血小板体积(MPV)、嗜酸性粒细胞、红细胞分布宽度和血小板分布宽度(PDW),被认为是新的炎症标志物。我们旨在比较非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者中CCD充分或不充分时的血常规参数值。
共纳入177例接受冠状动脉造影的NSTEMI患者,并根据CCD的发育情况分为两组:一组CCD充分(n = 88),另一组CCD受损(n = 89)。
两组间基线人口统计学和临床危险因素相似。两组间血常规参数无显著差异。然而,与CCD不充分组相比,CCD充分组的中位PDW显著更高,分别为17.6(1.4)和17.8(1.6),p = 0.004。在多变量分析中,发现与CCD不充分组相比,CCD充分组的PDW(p = 0.001,OR的95%CI:0.489(0.319 - 0.750))有显著差异。Pearson相关分析显示,PDW与Rentrop评分显著相关(r = 0.26,p < 0.001)。
我们认为,由于PDW是一种廉价且易于评估的指标,它可作为NSTEMI患者CCD的标志物。