Nazarian Alireza, Yashin Anatoliy I, Kulminski Alexander M
Biodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
J Clin Med. 2020 May 15;9(5):1489. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051489.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with no curative treatment available. Exploring the genetic and non-genetic contributors to AD pathogenesis is essential to better understand its underlying biological mechanisms, and to develop novel preventive and therapeutic strategies. We investigated potential genetically driven epigenetic heterogeneity of AD through summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR), which combined results from our previous genome-wide association analyses with those from two publicly available methylation quantitative trait loci studies of blood and brain tissue samples. We found that 152 probes corresponding to 113 genes were epigenetically associated with AD at a Bonferroni-adjusted significance level of 5.49E-07. Of these, 10 genes had significant probes in both brain-specific and blood-based analyses. Comparing males vs. females and hypertensive vs. non-hypertensive subjects, we found that 22 and 79 probes had group-specific associations with AD, respectively, suggesting a potential role for such epigenetic modifications in the heterogeneous nature of AD. Our analyses provided stronger evidence for possible roles of four genes (i.e., , , , and ) in AD pathogenesis as they were also transcriptionally associated with AD. The identified associations suggest a list of prioritized genes for follow-up functional studies and advance our understanding of AD pathogenesis.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,目前尚无治愈方法。探索AD发病机制的遗传和非遗传因素对于更好地理解其潜在生物学机制以及开发新的预防和治疗策略至关重要。我们通过基于汇总数据的孟德尔随机化(SMR)研究了AD潜在的遗传驱动的表观遗传异质性,该方法将我们之前全基因组关联分析的结果与两项公开可用的血液和脑组织样本甲基化定量性状位点研究的结果相结合。我们发现,在经Bonferroni校正的显著性水平为5.49E-07时,与113个基因对应的152个探针在表观遗传上与AD相关。其中,10个基因在脑特异性分析和基于血液的分析中均有显著探针。比较男性与女性以及高血压患者与非高血压患者,我们发现分别有22个和79个探针与AD存在组特异性关联,这表明这种表观遗传修饰在AD的异质性中可能发挥作用。我们的分析为四个基因(即 、 、 和 )在AD发病机制中的可能作用提供了更强的证据,因为它们在转录水平上也与AD相关。所确定的关联为后续功能研究提供了一份优先考虑的基因清单,并增进了我们对AD发病机制的理解。