• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

90 岁以上老人的放射治疗:生物学年龄与实际年龄的价值。

Radiotherapy for nonagenarians: the value of biological versus chronological age.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 19;15(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01563-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13014-020-01563-x
PMID:32430009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7236131/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of nonagenarian cancer patients (≥ 90 years) is continuously increasing, and radiotherapy is performed in a relevant proportion of patients, as surgery and chemotherapy are often not feasible for these patients. However, the evidence regarding the feasibility and treatment outcomes after radiotherapy for this patient group is very limited.

METHODS

All nonagenarian patients receiving (chemo) radiotherapy between 2009 and 2019 at the University of Freiburg - Medical Center were analyzed for patterns of care, overall survival (OS) and therapy-associated toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the influence of patient- and treatment-related factors on patient outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred nineteen patients with a total of 137 irradiated lesions were included in this analysis. After a median follow-up of 27 months, median OS was 10 months with a 3-year OS amounting to 11.1%. Univariate analyses demonstrated that a reduced performance status (HR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.00-2.45, p < 0.05), a higher burden of comorbidities (HR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.00-4.10, p < 0.05) and higher UICC tumor stages (HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.14-4.26, p < 0.05) were associated with impaired survival rates. Split-course treatments (HR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.07-3.94, p < 0.05), non-completion of radiotherapy (HR = 7.17, 95% CI 3.88-13.26, p < 0.001) and palliative treatments (HR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.68-4.81, p < 0.05) were found to result in significantly reduced OS. In the multivariate analysis, split-course concepts (HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.10-4.37, p < 0.05) and palliative treatments (HR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.77-5.75, p < 0.001) significantly deteriorated outcomes, while impaired ECOG status (HR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.91-2.43, p = 0.11) did not. The vast majority of patients reported either no (n = 40; 33.6%) or grade 1-2 acute toxicities (n = 66; 55.5%), and only very few higher-grade toxicities were observed in our study.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy for nonagenarian patients is generally feasible and associated with a low toxicity profile. Given the relatively poor OS rates and the importance of the quality of life for this patient group, individualized treatment regimens including hypofractionation concepts should be considered.

摘要

背景

90 岁以上的非老年癌症患者(≥90 岁)的数量不断增加,相当一部分患者接受放疗,因为手术和化疗对这些患者往往不可行。然而,关于该患者组接受放疗后的可行性和治疗结果的证据非常有限。

方法

对 2009 年至 2019 年期间在弗赖堡大学医疗中心接受(化疗)放疗的所有 90 岁以上患者的治疗模式、总生存率(OS)和根据常见不良事件术语标准评估的治疗相关毒性进行分析。采用单因素和多因素 Cox 回归分析评估患者和治疗相关因素对患者结局的影响。

结果

本分析共纳入 119 例患者,共 137 个放疗病灶。中位随访 27 个月后,中位 OS 为 10 个月,3 年 OS 率为 11.1%。单因素分析表明,体力状态下降(HR=1.56,95%CI 1.00-2.45,p<0.05)、合并症负担增加(HR=2.00,95%CI 1.00-4.10,p<0.05)和更高的 UICC 肿瘤分期(HR=2.21,95%CI 1.14-4.26,p<0.05)与生存率下降相关。分割疗程治疗(HR=2.05,95%CI 1.07-3.94,p<0.05)、放疗未完成(HR=7.17,95%CI 3.88-13.26,p<0.001)和姑息治疗(HR=2.84,95%CI 1.68-4.81,p<0.05)与显著降低的 OS 相关。在多因素分析中,分割疗程治疗(HR=2.21,95%CI 1.10-4.37,p<0.05)和姑息治疗(HR=3.19,95%CI 1.77-5.75,p<0.001)显著恶化了结果,而体力状态下降(HR=1.49,95%CI 0.91-2.43,p=0.11)没有。绝大多数患者报告无(n=40;33.6%)或 1-2 级急性毒性(n=66;55.5%),研究中仅观察到少数较高等级的毒性。

结论

对于 90 岁以上的患者,放疗通常是可行的,且具有较低的毒性特征。鉴于该患者组的 OS 率相对较差,以及生活质量对该患者组的重要性,应考虑个体化治疗方案,包括分割治疗概念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cca/7236131/cc07c2c29b77/13014_2020_1563_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cca/7236131/018cb5724dd7/13014_2020_1563_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cca/7236131/d7ff9be21860/13014_2020_1563_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cca/7236131/e93bf5a9b3f1/13014_2020_1563_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cca/7236131/cc07c2c29b77/13014_2020_1563_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cca/7236131/018cb5724dd7/13014_2020_1563_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cca/7236131/d7ff9be21860/13014_2020_1563_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cca/7236131/e93bf5a9b3f1/13014_2020_1563_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cca/7236131/cc07c2c29b77/13014_2020_1563_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Radiotherapy for nonagenarians: the value of biological versus chronological age.90 岁以上老人的放射治疗:生物学年龄与实际年龄的价值。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 19;15(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01563-x.
2
Radiotherapy for geriatric head-and-neck cancer patients: what is the value of standard treatment in the elderly?老年头颈部癌症患者的放射治疗:标准治疗在老年人中的价值如何?
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Feb 4;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-1481-z.
3
The value of moderate dose escalation for re-irradiation of recurrent or second primary head-and-neck cancer.中等剂量递增用于复发性或第二原发性头颈癌再照射的价值。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Apr 16;15(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01531-5.
4
Radiotherapy in nonagenarian patients: A 20-year retrospective analysis in a single ternary centre.非agenarian患者的放射治疗:在单一三元中心进行的20年回顾性分析。 注:这里“nonagenarian”意思是“九十多岁的人”,原翻译中“agenarian”有误。正确译文为: 九十多岁患者的放射治疗:在单一三元中心进行的20年回顾性分析。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb;68(1):103-109. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13599. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
5
Chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for adults with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma.早期霍奇金淋巴瘤成人患者单纯化疗与化疗联合放疗的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 27;4(4):CD007110. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007110.pub3.
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
7
Feasibility of radiotherapy in nonagenarian patients: a retrospective study.90 岁以上患者放疗的可行性:一项回顾性研究。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Jan;195(1):62-68. doi: 10.1007/s00066-018-1355-6. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
Radiation-induced toxicities and outcomes after radiotherapy are independent of patient age in elderly salivary gland cancer patients: results from a matched-pair analysis of a rare disease.放疗后放射性毒性和结局与老年涎腺癌患者的年龄无关:罕见病配对分析的结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul;278(7):2537-2548. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06393-x. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
External beam radiation dose escalation for high grade glioma.高级别胶质瘤的外照射放疗剂量递增
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 19(8):CD011475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011475.pub2.
10
Radiotherapy of the oldest old-feasibility and institutional analysis.高龄患者的放射治疗:可行性和机构分析。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Aug;196(8):683-690. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01621-z. Epub 2020 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and adaptations of the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) scale: a systematic review.分级预后评估(GPA)量表的发展与适应性:一项系统综述
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2023 Dec;40(6):445-463. doi: 10.1007/s10585-023-10237-3. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
2
Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?老年肿瘤放射治疗学:我们了解多少,我们能做得更好?
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 May 4;18:689-711. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S365495. eCollection 2023.
3
Palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases in octogenarians: How do the oldest olds respond? Results from a tertiary cancer center with 288 treated patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiotherapy for geriatric head-and-neck cancer patients: what is the value of standard treatment in the elderly?老年头颈部癌症患者的放射治疗:标准治疗在老年人中的价值如何?
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Feb 4;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-1481-z.
2
Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment among healthcare professionals: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.医务人员体能状态评估中绩效评估的组内可靠性:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2071-2078. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05261-7. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
3
Stability and survival analysis of elderly patients with osteolytic spinal bone metastases after palliative radiotherapy : Results from a large multicenter cohort.
高龄骨转移患者的姑息性放疗:最年长的患者反应如何?来自一家三级癌症中心的 288 例治疗患者的结果。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Sep 7;17(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02122-2.
4
Patterns-of-Care Analysis for Radiotherapy of Elderly Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients: A Trinational Survey in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.老年头颈癌患者放射治疗的护理模式分析:德国、奥地利和瑞士的三国调查。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 3;11:723716. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.723716. eCollection 2021.
5
The value of primary and adjuvant radiotherapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head-and-neck region in the elderly.老年头颈部皮肤鳞状细胞癌的初级和辅助放疗的价值。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jun 12;16(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01832-3.
6
Surviving Elderly Patients with Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma-What Is the Long-Term Quality of Life after Curative Radiotherapy?老年头颈部鳞状细胞癌幸存者——根治性放疗后的长期生活质量如何?
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 13;13(6):1275. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061275.
7
Radiation-induced toxicities and outcomes after radiotherapy are independent of patient age in elderly salivary gland cancer patients: results from a matched-pair analysis of a rare disease.放疗后放射性毒性和结局与老年涎腺癌患者的年龄无关:罕见病配对分析的结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul;278(7):2537-2548. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06393-x. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
老年溶骨性脊柱骨转移患者姑息性放疗后的稳定性和生存分析:一项大型多中心队列研究结果。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Dec;195(12):1074-1085. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01482-1. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
4
Association between comorbidity and survival in head and neck cancer: Results from Head and Neck 5000.头颈部肿瘤中合并症与生存的关系:来自头颈部 5000 研究的结果。
Head Neck. 2019 Apr;41(4):1053-1062. doi: 10.1002/hed.25543. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
5
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
Feasibility of radiotherapy in nonagenarian patients: a retrospective study.90 岁以上患者放疗的可行性:一项回顾性研究。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Jan;195(1):62-68. doi: 10.1007/s00066-018-1355-6. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
7
Chemoradiotherapy as Definitive Treatment for Elderly Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.化放疗作为老年头颈部癌症患者的确定性治疗方法。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jan 17;2018:3508795. doi: 10.1155/2018/3508795. eCollection 2018.
8
Never too old: A single-institution experience of stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients 90 years and older with early stage lung cancer.永不言老:90 岁及以上早期肺癌患者行立体定向体部放疗的单中心经验
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov-Dec;7(6):e543-e549. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
9
Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer.对326名早期乳腺癌老年女性进行综合老年医学评估。
Br J Cancer. 2017 Sep 26;117(7):925-931. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.257. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
10
Radiotherapy among nonagenarians with anal or rectal carcinoma: should we avoid or adapt treatment?非agenarians患有肛门或直肠癌的放射治疗:我们应该避免还是调整治疗? 注:“nonagenarians”可能有误,推测应该是“nonagenarian”,意思是“九十多岁的人” 。正确译文应该是: 九十多岁的肛门或直肠癌患者的放射治疗:我们应该避免还是调整治疗?
Chin J Cancer. 2017 Jul 14;36(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40880-017-0224-5.