Department of Intensive Care, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Anaesthesia. 2020 Sep;75(9):1223-1228. doi: 10.1111/anae.15050. Epub 2020 May 19.
Historically, there has been a tendency to think that there are two types of death: circulatory and neurological. Holding onto this tendency is making it harder to navigate emerging resuscitative technologies, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and the recent well-publicised experiment that demonstrated the possibility of restoring cellular function to some brain neurons 4 h after normothermic circulatory arrest (decapitation) in pigs. Attempts have been made to respond to these difficulties by proposing a unified brain-based criterion for human death, which we call 'permanent brain arrest'. The clinical characteristics of permanent brain arrest are the permanent loss of capacity for consciousness and permanent loss of all brainstem functions, including the capacity to breathe. These losses could arise from a primary brain injury or as a result of systemic circulatory arrest. We argue that permanent brain arrest is the true and sole criterion for the death of human beings and show that this is already implicit in the circulatory-respiratory criterion itself. We argue that accepting the concept of permanent cessation of brain function in patients with systemic permanent circulatory arrest will help us better navigate the medical advances and new technologies of the future whilst continuing to provide sound medical criteria for the determination of death.
从历史上看,人们倾向于认为有两种类型的死亡:循环系统和神经系统。这种倾向使得人们更难驾驭新兴的复苏技术,例如体外膜氧合和最近广为人知的实验,该实验表明在猪的正常体温循环停止(斩首)后 4 小时,某些脑细胞的功能有可能恢复。人们试图通过提出一个统一的基于大脑的人类死亡标准来应对这些困难,我们称之为“永久性脑停搏”。永久性脑停搏的临床特征是意识能力的永久性丧失和所有脑干功能的永久性丧失,包括呼吸能力。这些损失可能是由原发性脑损伤或全身循环停止引起的。我们认为,永久性脑停搏是人类死亡的真实和唯一标准,并表明这已经隐含在循环呼吸标准本身之中。我们认为,接受全身永久性循环停止患者的大脑功能永久性停止的概念,将有助于我们更好地驾驭未来的医学进步和新技术,同时继续为确定死亡提供合理的医学标准。