Mirkes Renée
Center for NaProEthics, the ethics division of the Pope Paul VI Institute, Omaha, NE, USA.
Linacre Q. 2019 Feb;86(1):115-126. doi: 10.1177/0024363919838134. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
The medicalization of transhumanist technologies demands our prompt and undivided attention. This article surveys the principal body/mind enhancement goals of transhumanist medicine and the means it would employ-genetic, robo, info-, and nanotechnologies-to accomplish those ends (Part One). Second, it engages Christian anthropological and natural law principles to evaluate the populist and essentialist concerns these therapeutic/enhancement interventions provoke (Part Two). And, third, it proposes formation of a Catholic medical think tank to appraise whether transhumanist biotechnologies can serve human dignity and, to the extent they can, to formulate wise clinical/administrative guidelines for their inclusion in US Catholic healthcare settings (Part Three).
This article explores the body/mind enhancement goals of transhumanist medicine, evaluates the biotechnological means to accomplish those therapeutic/enhancement goals, and suggests the formation of a Catholic medical think tank to formulate wise clinical/administrative guidelines for the inclusion of genetic, robo, info-, and nanotechnologies in US Catholic healthcare settings.
超人类主义技术的医学化需要我们立即给予充分关注。本文审视了超人类主义医学增强身心的主要目标以及为实现这些目标所采用的手段——基因技术、机器人技术、信息技术和纳米技术(第一部分)。其次,本文运用基督教人类学和自然法原则,评估这些治疗/增强干预措施引发的民粹主义和本质主义担忧(第二部分)。第三,本文提议成立一个天主教医学智囊团,以评估超人类主义生物技术是否能维护人类尊严,以及在何种程度上能够维护人类尊严,并制定明智的临床/管理指南,以便将这些技术纳入美国天主教医疗环境(第三部分)。
本文探讨了超人类主义医学增强身心的目标,评估了实现这些治疗/增强目标的生物技术手段,并建议成立一个天主教医学智囊团,以制定明智的临床/管理指南,将基因技术、机器人技术、信息技术和纳米技术纳入美国天主教医疗环境。