Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Clinic of Neurosurgery, Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Int J Nanomedicine. 2020 Apr 30;15:2999-3022. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S231479. eCollection 2020.
High-grade gliomas are still characterized by a poor prognosis, despite recent advances in surgical treatment. Chemotherapy is currently practiced after surgery, but its efficacy is limited by aspecific toxicity on healthy cells, tumour cell chemoresistance, poor selectivity, and especially by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Thus, despite the large number of potential drug candidates, the choice of effective chemotherapeutics is still limited to few compounds. Malignant gliomas are characterized by high infiltration and neovascularization, and leaky BBB (the so-called blood-brain tumour barrier); surgical resection is often incomplete, leaving residual cells that are able to migrate and proliferate. Nanocarriers can favour delivery of chemotherapeutics to brain tumours owing to different strategies, including chemical stabilization of the drug in the bloodstream; passive targeting (because of the leaky vascularization at the tumour site); inhibition of drug efflux mechanisms in endothelial and cancer cells; and active targeting by exploiting carriers and receptors overexpressed at the blood-brain tumour barrier. Within this concern, a suitable nanomedicine-based therapy for gliomas should not be limited to cytotoxic agents, but also target the most important pathogenetic mechanisms, including cell differentiation pathways and angiogenesis. Moreover, the combinatorial approach of cell therapy plus nanomedicine strategies can open new therapeutical opportunities. The major part of attempted preclinical approaches on animal models involves active targeting with protein ligands, but, despite encouraging results, a few number of nanomedicines reached clinical trials, and most of them include drug-loaded nanocarriers free of targeting ligands, also because of safety and scalability concerns.
尽管在手术治疗方面取得了最近的进展,但高级别神经胶质瘤仍然预后不良。目前在手术后进行化疗,但由于对健康细胞的特异性毒性、肿瘤细胞的化疗耐药性、选择性差,尤其是血脑屏障(BBB)的存在,其疗效受到限制。因此,尽管有大量潜在的候选药物,但有效的化疗药物的选择仍然局限于少数几种化合物。恶性神经胶质瘤的特点是高浸润性和新生血管形成,以及 BBB 通透性增加(所谓的血脑肿瘤屏障);手术切除往往不完整,留下能够迁移和增殖的残留细胞。纳米载体可以通过不同的策略促进化疗药物递送到脑肿瘤,包括在血液中稳定药物;被动靶向(由于肿瘤部位的血管通透性增加);抑制内皮细胞和癌细胞中的药物外排机制;以及利用在血脑肿瘤屏障过度表达的载体和受体进行主动靶向。在这方面,适合脑胶质瘤的纳米医学治疗不应仅限于细胞毒性药物,还应针对最重要的发病机制,包括细胞分化途径和血管生成。此外,细胞治疗加纳米医学策略的联合方法可以开辟新的治疗机会。动物模型中的大多数尝试的临床前方法主要涉及蛋白配体的主动靶向,但尽管取得了令人鼓舞的结果,只有少数几种纳米药物进入临床试验,而且大多数药物都包含无靶向配体的载药纳米载体,这也是出于安全性和可扩展性的考虑。