Trostle J
Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley 94720.
Epilepsy Res Suppl. 1988;1:57-69.
This community-based study of epilepsy in Rochester, Minnesota found that almost 60% of 127 adults aged 18-59 said they had altered their anticonvulsant medications in one of the following 3 ways: stopped taking them for at least 3 days, discontinued them completely, or changed the dosage for more than 2 weeks. Twenty percent said they had followed an altered regimen in the week before the interview. Medical records for 10 years for the entire group of 199 prevalence cases in this age range showed that 28% had discontinued medications for more than 3 days, and 14% had changed the dosage for more than 2 weeks. Comparing interview statements with information in the medical record, 70% of interviewees had changed their medications in one of these ways. There is a basic difference between changing and stopping the dose: changing involves evaluating the regimen; stopping involves evaluating the illness itself. Such testing is a common part of managing epilepsy over time. These strategies can be called forms of self-regulation of medical regimens. The concept of self-regulation challenges the traditional patient-doctor relationship because it grants more autonomy and control to the patient and requires basic re-examinations of clinical expectations and patient responsibilities.
这项在明尼苏达州罗切斯特市开展的基于社区的癫痫研究发现,在127名年龄在18至59岁的成年人中,近60%的人表示他们以以下三种方式之一改变了抗惊厥药物的服用方式:停药至少3天、完全停药或改变剂量超过2周。20%的人表示在接受采访前一周遵循了改变后的治疗方案。对该年龄范围内199名患病率病例的整个群体的10年医疗记录显示,28%的人停药超过3天,14%的人改变剂量超过2周。将采访陈述与医疗记录中的信息进行比较,70%的受访者以这些方式之一改变了他们的药物治疗。改变剂量和停药之间存在根本区别:改变剂量涉及评估治疗方案;停药涉及评估疾病本身。随着时间的推移,这种检测是管理癫痫的常见部分。这些策略可被称为医疗方案自我调整的形式。自我调整的概念挑战了传统的医患关系,因为它赋予患者更多的自主权和控制权,并且需要对临床期望和患者责任进行基本的重新审视。