• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗胸腺细胞球蛋白与白细胞介素 2 受体拮抗剂在丙型肝炎病毒肾移植受者中的应用。

Antithymocyte Globulin Versus Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonist in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Hepatitis C Virus.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2020 Jun;104(6):1294-1303. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002959.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000002959
PMID:32433232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7534413/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients are at increased risks of rejection and graft failure. The optimal induction agent for this population remains controversial, particularly regarding concerns that antithymocyte globulin (ATG) might increase HCV-related complications.

METHODS

Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare claims data, we studied 6780 HCV+ and 139 681 HCV- KT recipients in 1999-2016 who received ATG or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA) for induction. We first examined the association of recipient HCV status with receiving ATG (versus IL2RA) using multilevel logistic regression. Then, we studied the association of ATG (versus IL2RA) with KT outcomes (rejection, graft failure, and death) and hepatic complications (liver transplant registration and cirrhosis) among HCV+ recipients using logistic and Cox regression.

RESULTS

HCV+ recipients were less likely to receive ATG than HCV- recipients (living donor, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.640.770.91; deceased donor, aOR = 0.710.810.92). In contrast, HCV+ recipients who received ATG were at lower risk of acute rejection compared to those who received IL2RA (1-y crude incidence = 11.6% versus 12.6%; aOR = 0.680.820.99). There was no significant difference in the risks of graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.861.001.17), death (aHR = 0.850.951.07), liver transplant registration (aHR = 0.580.971.61), and cirrhosis (aHR = 0.730.921.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ATG, as compared to IL2RA, may lower the risk of acute rejection without increasing hepatic complications in HCV+ KT recipients. Given the higher rates of acute rejection in this population, ATG appears to be safe and reasonable for HCV+ recipients.

摘要

背景

丙型肝炎病毒阳性(HCV+)的肾移植(KT)受者发生排斥反应和移植物失功的风险增加。对于这一人群,最佳诱导剂仍存在争议,特别是抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)可能增加 HCV 相关并发症的担忧。

方法

我们使用 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 和 Medicare 理赔数据,研究了 1999 年至 2016 年间 6780 名 HCV+和 139681 名 HCV-的 KT 受者,他们接受了 ATG 或白细胞介素-2 受体拮抗剂(IL2RA)诱导。首先,我们使用多水平逻辑回归分析了受者 HCV 状态与接受 ATG(与 IL2RA 相比)的相关性。然后,我们使用逻辑回归和 Cox 回归研究了 ATG(与 IL2RA 相比)与 HCV+受者的 KT 结局(排斥反应、移植物失功和死亡)和肝脏并发症(肝移植登记和肝硬化)之间的相关性。

结果

与 HCV-受者相比,HCV+受者接受 ATG 的可能性较低(活体供者,调整后的优势比 [aOR] = 0.640.770.91;已故供者,aOR = 0.710.810.92)。相反,与接受 IL2RA 的患者相比,接受 ATG 的 HCV+受者发生急性排斥反应的风险较低(1 年的总发生率为 11.6%与 12.6%;aOR = 0.680.820.99)。在移植物失功(调整后的危险比 [aHR] = 0.861.001.17)、死亡(aHR = 0.850.951.07)、肝移植登记(aHR = 0.580.971.61)和肝硬化(aHR = 0.730.921.16)的风险方面,两组之间无显著差异。

结论

与 IL2RA 相比,我们的研究结果表明,ATG 可能会降低 HCV+KT 受者急性排斥反应的风险,而不会增加肝脏并发症。鉴于该人群急性排斥反应的发生率较高,ATG 似乎对 HCV+受者是安全且合理的。

相似文献

1
Antithymocyte Globulin Versus Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonist in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Hepatitis C Virus.抗胸腺细胞球蛋白与白细胞介素 2 受体拮抗剂在丙型肝炎病毒肾移植受者中的应用。
Transplantation. 2020 Jun;104(6):1294-1303. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002959.
2
Acute Rejection Rates and Graft Outcomes According to Induction Regimen among Recipients of Kidneys from Deceased Donors Treated with Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate.根据他克莫司和霉酚酸酯治疗的已故供体肾移植受者的诱导方案,急性排斥反应率和移植物结局
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Sep 7;11(9):1650-1661. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13171215. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
3
The Influence of Antithymocyte Globulin Dose on the Incidence of CMV Infection in High-risk Kidney Transplant Recipients Without Pharmacological Prophylaxis.无药物预防的高危肾移植受者中抗胸腺细胞球蛋白剂量对 CMV 感染发生率的影响。
Transplantation. 2020 Oct;104(10):2139-2147. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003124.
4
Lack of Benefit and Potential Harm of Induction Therapy in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplants.肝肾联合移植中诱导治疗的无获益及潜在危害
Liver Transpl. 2019 Mar;25(3):411-424. doi: 10.1002/lt.25390.
5
Antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in hepatitis C-positive liver transplant recipients.丙型肝炎阳性肝移植受者的抗胸腺细胞球蛋白诱导治疗。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;9(7):896-902. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.020.
6
Impact of immunosuppressive regimen on survival of kidney transplant recipients with hepatitis C.免疫抑制方案对丙型肝炎肾移植受者生存的影响。
Transplantation. 2008 Jun 15;85(11):1601-6. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181722f3a.
7
Basiliximab versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy for living-related renal transplantation: a single-center experience.巴利昔单抗与兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白作为亲属活体肾移植诱导治疗的单中心经验。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Aug;48(8):1363-1370. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1307-y. Epub 2016 May 11.
8
Induction Therapies in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation on Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate With or Without Steroid Maintenance.活体供肾移植中使用他克莫司和霉酚酸酯并联合或不联合类固醇维持治疗的诱导疗法。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):1041-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08710814. Epub 2015 May 15.
9
Impact of Donor Hepatitis C Virus on Kidney Transplant Outcomes for Hepatitis C-positive Recipients in the Direct-acting Antiviral Era: Time to Revise the Kidney Donor Risk Index?直接作用抗病毒药物时代丙型肝炎病毒供体对丙型肝炎病毒阳性受者肾移植结局的影响:是否需要修订肾脏供体风险指数?
Transplantation. 2020 Jun;104(6):1215-1228. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002949.
10
Identification of Optimal Donor-Recipient Combinations Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Positive Kidney Transplant Recipients.在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)阳性肾移植受者中确定最佳供体-受体组合
Am J Transplant. 2016 Aug;16(8):2377-83. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13847. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization of HCV viremic donors in kidney transplantation: a chance or a threat?丙型肝炎病毒血症供者在肾移植中的应用:是机会还是威胁?
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):434-449. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2047069.
2
Induction immunosuppression and the risk of incident malignancies among older and younger kidney transplant recipients: A prospective cohort study.诱导免疫抑制与老年和年轻肾移植受者新发恶性肿瘤的风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Transplant. 2020 Dec;34(12):e14121. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14121. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
3
Machine learning to predict transplant outcomes: helpful or hype? A national cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Executive summary of the 2018 KDIGO Hepatitis C in CKD Guideline: welcoming advances in evaluation and management.2018KDIGO 慢性肾脏病合并丙型肝炎病毒感染临床实践指南摘要:评估和管理的进步值得欢迎。
Kidney Int. 2018 Oct;94(4):663-673. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.06.011.
2
Center practice drives variation in choice of US kidney transplant induction therapy: a retrospective analysis of contemporary practice.中心实践导致美国肾移植诱导治疗选择的差异:对当代实践的回顾性分析。
Transpl Int. 2018 Feb;31(2):198-211. doi: 10.1111/tri.13079. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
3
Immune responses and immunopathology in acute and chronic viral hepatitis.
机器学习预测移植结局:有帮助还是炒作?一项全国队列研究。
Transpl Int. 2020 Nov;33(11):1472-1480. doi: 10.1111/tri.13695. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
急性和慢性病毒性肝炎中的免疫应答和免疫病理学。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2016 Aug;16(8):509-23. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.69. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
4
National Variation in Use of Immunosuppression for Kidney Transplantation: A Call for Evidence-Based Regimen Selection.肾移植免疫抑制使用的全国性差异:呼吁基于证据的方案选择。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Aug;16(8):2453-62. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13758. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
5
Kidney.肾脏
Am J Transplant. 2016 Jan;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):11-46. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13666.
6
Successful Treatment of Hepatitis C in Renal Transplant Recipients With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗肾移植受者丙型肝炎的疗效。
Am J Transplant. 2016 May;16(5):1588-95. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13620. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
7
Daclizumab Versus Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin in High-Risk Renal Transplants: Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study.达利珠单抗与兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白在高危肾移植中的比较:一项随机研究的 5 年随访。
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jul;15(7):1923-32. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13191. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
8
Campath induction in HCV and HCV/HIV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients.环孢素 A 诱导治疗 HCV 和 HCV/HIV 血清阳性的肾移植受者。
Transpl Int. 2013 Oct;26(10):1016-26. doi: 10.1111/tri.12167. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
9
Validation of three coding algorithms to identify patients with end-stage liver disease in an administrative database.在一个管理数据库中验证三种编码算法以识别终末期肝病患者。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):765-769. doi: 10.1002/pds.3290. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
10
Kidney transplantation in hepatitis C-positive recipients: does type of induction influence outcomes?丙型肝炎病毒阳性受者的肾移植:诱导类型是否会影响预后?
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jun;44(5):1262-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.076.