Author Affiliations: Professor, (Dr Rueda-Medina), Associate Professors, (Drs Gómez-Urquiza, Molina-Rivas, and Correa-Rodríguez), Nursing Department at the University of Granada; Associate Professors, (Tapia-Haro, and Aguilar-Ferrándiz), Physical Therapy Department at the University of Granada, Spain.
Nurse Educ. 2021 Jan/Feb;46(1):E7-E11. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000845.
Debriefing is considered a critical component of simulation-based learning, but the differences between different debriefing methods remain unclear.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of the debriefing assessment, problem-solving process, and team effectiveness among students who received instructor-led debriefing, self-debriefing, and combined debriefing.
An experimental design was conducted with 250 students (nursing, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy). Differences in the Debriefing Experience Scale (DES), Problem Solving Inventory (PSI), and Communication and Teamwork Skills (CATS) assessment between the groups were measured.
In nursing students, the combined debriefing group had the highest scores for the CATS assessment (P < .001) and for the coordination (P < .001), cooperation (P = .012), and communication (P = .002) categories. No significant differences were observed between debriefing groups for DES or PSI.
Combined debriefing improves communication and team skills in students. Educators might promote combined debriefing after simulation sessions as it seems to improve team effectiveness.
汇报被认为是基于模拟学习的关键组成部分,但不同汇报方法之间的差异仍不清楚。
本研究旨在调查接受教师主导汇报、自我汇报和联合汇报的学生在汇报评估、解决问题的过程和团队有效性方面的效果。
对 250 名学生(护理、物理治疗和职业治疗)进行了一项实验设计。在组间比较了汇报体验量表(DES)、问题解决量表(PSI)和沟通与团队合作技能量表(CATS)评估的差异。
在护理学生中,联合汇报组在 CATS 评估(P <.001)以及协调(P <.001)、合作(P =.012)和沟通(P =.002)方面的得分最高。DES 或 PSI 各汇报组之间没有显著差异。
联合汇报可提高学生的沟通和团队技能。教育工作者可以在模拟课程后提倡联合汇报,因为它似乎可以提高团队的有效性。