Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA.
College of Physical Education, Kyung Hee University, Gyeonggi-do, SOUTH KOREA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Dec;52(12):2628-2636. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002410.
Current occupational heat stress guidelines rely on time-weighted averaging to quantify the metabolic demands of variable-intensity work. However, variable-intensity work may be associated with impairments in whole-body total heat loss (dry + evaporative heat loss), especially in older workers, which exacerbate heat strain relative to constant-intensity work eliciting the same time-weighted average metabolic rate. We, therefore, used direct calorimetry to evaluate whether variable-intensity work would cause decrements in the average rate of whole-body total heat loss that augment body heat storage and core temperature compared with constant-intensity work in young and older men.
Eight young (19-31 yr) and eight older (54-65 yr) men completed four trials involving 90 min of work (cycling) eliciting an average metabolic heat production of ~200 W·m in dry-heat (40°C, 20% relative humidity). One trial involved constant-intensity work (CON), whereas the others involved 10-min cycles of variable-intensity work: 5-min low-intensity and 5-min high-intensity (VAR 5:5), 6-min low-intensity and 4-min very high-intensity (VAR 6:4), and 7-min low- and 3-min very, very high-intensity (VAR 7:3). Metabolic heat production, total heat loss, body heat storage (heat production minus total heat loss), and core (rectal) temperature were measured throughout.
When averaged over each 90-min work period, metabolic heat production, total heat loss, and heat storage were similar between groups and conditions (all P ≥ 0.152). Peak core temperature (average of final 10 min) was also similar between groups and conditions (both P ≥ 0.111).
Whole-body total heat loss, heat storage, and core temperature were not significantly influenced by the partitioning of work intensity in young or older men, indicating that time-weighted averaging appears to be appropriate for quantifying the metabolic demands of variable-intensity work to assess occupational heat stress.
目前的职业热应激指南依赖于时间加权平均来量化可变强度工作的代谢需求。然而,可变强度工作可能与全身总热损失(干热+蒸发热损失)的减少有关,尤其是在老年工人中,与引起相同时间加权平均代谢率的恒强度工作相比,这种减少会加剧热应激。因此,我们使用直接量热法评估可变强度工作是否会导致全身总热损失的平均速率降低,从而与恒强度工作相比,增加体热储存和核心温度。
八名年轻(19-31 岁)和八名年老(54-65 岁)男性完成了四项试验,涉及 90 分钟的工作(骑行),产生约 200 W·m 的平均代谢产热量在干燥热(40°C,20%相对湿度)下。一项试验涉及恒强度工作(CON),而其他试验涉及 10 分钟的可变强度工作循环:5 分钟低强度和 5 分钟高强度(VAR 5:5),6 分钟低强度和 4 分钟非常高强度(VAR 6:4),以及 7 分钟低强度和 3 分钟非常、非常高强度(VAR 7:3)。在整个试验过程中测量代谢产热量、总热损失、体热储存(产热量减去总热损失)和核心(直肠)温度。
当平均每个 90 分钟的工作周期时,代谢产热量、总热损失和热储存在组间和条件间相似(均 P≥0.152)。核心温度峰值(最后 10 分钟的平均值)在组间和条件间也相似(均 P≥0.111)。
在年轻或老年男性中,工作强度的分配并未显著影响全身总热损失、热储存和核心温度,这表明时间加权平均法似乎适用于量化可变强度工作的代谢需求,以评估职业热应激。