Larose Joanie, Boulay Pierre, Wright-Beatty Heather E, Sigal Ronald J, Hardcastle Stephen, Kenny Glen P
Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada;
Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada;
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Jul 1;117(1):69-79. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00123.2014. Epub 2014 May 8.
This study examined the progression of impairments in heat dissipation as a function of age and environmental conditions. Sixty men (n = 12 per group; 20-30, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, and 55-70 yr) performed four intermittent exercise/recovery cycles for a duration of 2 h in dry (35°C, 20% relative humidity) and humid (35°C, 60% relative humidity) conditions. Evaporative heat loss and metabolic heat production were measured by direct and indirect calorimetry, respectively. Body heat storage was measured as the temporal summation of heat production and heat loss during the sessions. Evaporative heat loss was reduced during exercise in the humid vs. dry condition in age groups 20-30 (-17%), 40-44 (-18%), 45-49 (-21%), 50-54 (-25%), and 55-70 yr (-20%). HE fell short of being significantly different between groups in the dry condition, but was greater in age group 20-30 yr (279 ± 10 W) compared with age groups 45-49 (248 ± 8 W), 50-54 (242 ± 6 W), and 55-70 yr (240 ± 7 W) in the humid condition. As a result of a reduced rate of heat dissipation predominantly during exercise, age groups 40-70 yr stored between 60-85 and 13-38% more heat than age group 20-30 yr in the dry and humid conditions, respectively. These age-related differences in heat dissipation and heat storage were not paralleled by significant differences in local sweating and skin blood flow, or by differences in core temperature between groups. From a whole body perspective, combined heat and humidity impeded heat dissipation to a similar extent across age groups, but, more importantly, intermittent exercise in dry and humid heat stress conditions created a greater thermoregulatory challenge for middle-aged and older adults.
本研究考察了散热功能障碍随年龄和环境条件变化的进展情况。60名男性(每组n = 12人;年龄分别为20 - 30岁、40 - 44岁、45 - 49岁、50 - 54岁和55 - 70岁)在干燥(35°C,相对湿度20%)和潮湿(35°C,相对湿度60%)条件下进行了4个间歇运动/恢复周期,持续时间为2小时。分别通过直接和间接量热法测量蒸发散热和代谢产热。体热储存通过各时段产热和散热的时间总和来测量。在20 - 30岁(-17%)、40 - 44岁(-18%)、45 - 49岁(-21%)、50 - 54岁(-25%)和55 - 70岁(-20%)年龄组中,与干燥条件相比,在潮湿条件下运动时蒸发散热减少。在干燥条件下,各组之间的体热储存差异不显著,但在潮湿条件下,20 - 30岁年龄组(279±10 W)的体热储存高于45 - 49岁(248±8 W)、50 - 54岁(242±6 W)和55 - 70岁(240±7 W)年龄组。由于主要在运动期间散热速率降低,在干燥和潮湿条件下,40 - 70岁年龄组分别比20 - 30岁年龄组多储存60 - 85%和13 - 38%的热量。这些与年龄相关的散热和体热储存差异在局部出汗、皮肤血流量或各组核心温度差异方面并无显著对应关系。从全身角度来看,热和湿度的综合作用在各年龄组中对散热的阻碍程度相似,但更重要的是,在干燥和潮湿热应激条件下的间歇运动对中年和老年人造成了更大的体温调节挑战。