Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 May 20;20(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02665-2.
Loneliness has not until recently been a prominent focus in research on outcomes of mental illness. The aim of this study was to determine whether loneliness at baseline predicts poor outcomes at 4-month follow-up for individuals who have experienced mental health crises. The outcomes in this study included overall symptom severity, affective symptoms, self-rated recovery and health-related quality of life.
Our study reports a secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial. The sample (n = 399) was taken from patients who received treatment from community crisis services. Respondents (n = 310) completed the follow-up measurement 4 months after baseline. Loneliness at baseline was assessed using an eight-item UCLA Loneliness Scale. The four mental health outcomes were measured at both baseline and follow-up. Two scales (or part thereof) assessed objective social isolation and neighbourhood social capital at baseline. Regression analyses were conducted to investigate longitudinal associations between loneliness at baseline and mental health outcomes at follow-up.
Loneliness at baseline was associated with all four mental health outcomes at 4-month follow-up, adjusting for psychosocial, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. A one-point higher loneliness score was associated with 0.74-point (95% CI 0.45, 1.02) and 0.34-point (95% CI 0.21, 0.47) increase in overall symptom severity score and affective symptoms score respectively, and with 1.08-point (95% CI -1.45, - 0.71) and 1.27-point (95% CI -1.79, - 0.75) decrease in self-rated recovery score and health-related quality of life score respectively. Loneliness was a better predictor of clinical outcomes than objective social isolation and social capital, even though the associations with clinical outcomes were reduced and no longer statistically significant following adjustment for their baseline values. A significant association with quality of life persisted after adjustment for its baseline score.
Greater loneliness at baseline predicted poorer health-related quality of life at follow-up. There were cross-sectional associations between loneliness and clinical outcomes, but their longitudinal relationship cannot be confirmed. Further research is needed to clearly establish their underpinning pathways. Reducing loneliness may be a promising target to improve recovery for mental health community crisis service users.
孤独感直到最近才成为精神疾病研究结果的一个突出焦点。本研究的目的是确定基线时的孤独感是否能预测经历心理健康危机的个体在 4 个月随访时的不良结局。本研究的结局包括总体症状严重程度、情感症状、自我评定的恢复情况和健康相关的生活质量。
我们的研究报告了一项随机对照试验的二次分析。样本(n=399)取自接受社区危机服务治疗的患者。在基线后 4 个月完成随访测量的应答者(n=310)。基线时使用 UCLA 孤独量表的 8 项条目评估孤独感。在基线和随访时测量四项心理健康结局。两个量表(或其部分)在基线时评估客观社会隔离和邻里社会资本。进行回归分析以调查基线时的孤独感与随访时的心理健康结局之间的纵向关联。
在调整了心理社会、社会人口学和临床特征后,基线时的孤独感与 4 个月随访时的所有四项心理健康结局相关。孤独感评分每增加 1 分,总体症状严重程度评分和情感症状评分分别增加 0.74 分(95%CI 0.45,1.02)和 0.34 分(95%CI 0.21,0.47),自我评定的恢复评分和健康相关的生活质量评分分别降低 1.08 分(95%CI -1.45,-0.71)和 1.27 分(95%CI -1.79,-0.75)。孤独感是临床结局的更好预测因素,甚至超过客观社会隔离和社会资本,尽管在调整其基线值后,与临床结局的关联减弱且不再具有统计学意义。在调整其基线评分后,与生活质量的显著关联仍然存在。
基线时的孤独感越大,随访时的健康相关生活质量越差。孤独感与临床结局之间存在横断面关联,但它们的纵向关系尚不能确定。需要进一步的研究来明确其潜在的途径。降低孤独感可能是改善心理健康社区危机服务使用者康复的一个有前途的目标。