• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用基于区块链的数字同意书和燕尾数字同意书应用程序评估患者对动态健康数据共享的认知:一项横断面探索性研究。

Evaluation of patient perception towards dynamic health data sharing using blockchain based digital consent with the Dovetail digital consent application: A cross sectional exploratory study.

作者信息

Despotou George, Evans Jill, Nash William, Eavis Alexandra, Robbins Tim, Arvanitis Theodoros N

机构信息

Institute of Digital Healthcare, WMG, University of Warwick, UK.

Dovetail Digital Ltd, London, UK.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2020 May 12;6:2055207620924949. doi: 10.1177/2055207620924949. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2055207620924949
PMID:32435503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7223864/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

New patient-centric integrated care models are enabled by the capability to exchange the patient's data amongst stakeholders, who each specialise in different aspects of the patient's care. This requires a robust, trusted and flexible mechanism for patients to offer consent to share their data. Furthermore, new IT technologies make it easier to give patients more control over their data, including the right to revoke consent. These characteristics challenge the traditional paper-based, single-organisation-led consent process. The Dovetail digital consent application uses a mobile application and blockchain based infrastructure to offer this capability, as part of a pilot allowing patients to have their data shared amongst digital tools, empowering patients to manage their condition within an integrated care setting.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient perceptions towards existing consent processes, and the Dovetail blockchain based digital consent application as a means to manage data sharing in the context of diabetes care.

METHOD

Patients with diabetes at a General Practitioner practice were recruited. Data were collected using focus groups and questionnaires. Thematic analysis of the focus group transcripts and descriptive statistics of the questionnaires was performed.

RESULTS

There was a lack of understanding of existing consent processes in place, and many patients did not have any recollection of having previously given consent. The digital consent application received favourable feedback, with patients recognising the value of the capability offered by the application. Patients overwhelmingly favoured the digital consent application over existing practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital consent was received favourably, with patients recognising that it addresses the main limitations of the current process. Feedback on potential improvements was received. Future work includes confirmation of results in a broader demographic sample and across multiple conditions.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的新型综合护理模式,是通过在各专门负责患者护理不同方面的利益相关者之间交换患者数据的能力来实现的。这需要一种强大、可靠且灵活的机制,以便患者能够同意分享其数据。此外,新的信息技术使患者更容易对自己的数据拥有更多控制权,包括撤销同意的权利。这些特性对传统的纸质、单一组织主导的同意流程构成了挑战。燕尾数字同意应用程序使用移动应用程序和基于区块链的基础设施来提供这种能力,作为一项试点的一部分,允许患者在数字工具之间共享其数据,使患者能够在综合护理环境中管理自己的病情。

目的

评估患者对现有同意流程的看法,以及基于燕尾区块链的数字同意应用程序作为在糖尿病护理背景下管理数据共享的一种手段的看法。

方法

招募了一家全科医生诊所的糖尿病患者。使用焦点小组和问卷调查收集数据。对焦点小组记录进行主题分析,并对问卷进行描述性统计。

结果

患者对现有的同意流程缺乏了解,许多患者不记得之前曾给予同意。数字同意应用程序获得了积极反馈,患者认可该应用程序所提供功能的价值。绝大多数患者更喜欢数字同意应用程序而非现有做法。

结论

数字同意受到了好评,患者认识到它解决了当前流程的主要局限性。收到了关于潜在改进的反馈。未来的工作包括在更广泛的人口样本和多种病症中确认结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/1ee7721efb67/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/22053e0394df/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/3125ceb98fe0/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/938917357285/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/493fb9367380/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/1ee7721efb67/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/22053e0394df/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/3125ceb98fe0/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/938917357285/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/493fb9367380/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c21/7223864/1ee7721efb67/10.1177_2055207620924949-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of patient perception towards dynamic health data sharing using blockchain based digital consent with the Dovetail digital consent application: A cross sectional exploratory study.使用基于区块链的数字同意书和燕尾数字同意书应用程序评估患者对动态健康数据共享的认知:一项横断面探索性研究。
Digit Health. 2020 May 12;6:2055207620924949. doi: 10.1177/2055207620924949. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.
3
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
4
A Blockchain-Based Dynamic Consent Architecture to Support Clinical Genomic Data Sharing (ConsentChain): Proof-of-Concept Study.一种基于区块链的支持临床基因组数据共享的动态同意架构(同意链):概念验证研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 3;9(11):e27816. doi: 10.2196/27816.
5
Patient Consent Management by a Purpose-Based Consent Model for Electronic Health Record Based on Blockchain Technology.基于区块链技术的电子健康记录的目的导向型同意模型的患者同意管理
Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):265-273. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.4.265. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
6
Blockchain Applications in Health Care and Public Health: Increased Transparency.区块链在医疗保健和公共卫生领域的应用:提高透明度。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jun 8;9(6):e20713. doi: 10.2196/20713.
7
Blockchain Integration With Digital Technology and the Future of Health Care Ecosystems: Systematic Review.区块链与数字技术融合与医疗保健生态系统的未来:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 2;23(11):e19846. doi: 10.2196/19846.
8
A Blockchain Framework for Patient-Centered Health Records and Exchange (HealthChain): Evaluation and Proof-of-Concept Study.一种用于以患者为中心的健康记录与交换的区块链框架(HealthChain):评估与概念验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 31;21(8):e13592. doi: 10.2196/13592.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Blockchain, consent and prosent for medical research.区块链、医学研究中的同意与激励措施
J Med Ethics. 2020 May 4;47(4):244-50. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105963.

引用本文的文献

1
Blockchain: What is the use case for physicians in 2024? A rapid review of the literature.区块链:2024年医生的用例是什么?文献快速回顾。
Future Healthc J. 2024 Feb 22;11(1):100005. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100005. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Identifying facilitators of and barriers to the adoption of dynamic consent in digital health ecosystems: a scoping review.识别数字健康生态系统中采用动态同意的促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 1;24(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00988-9.
3
Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review.

本文引用的文献

1
A Collaborative Platform for Management of Chronic Diseases via Guideline-Driven Individualized Care Plans.一个通过基于指南的个性化护理计划来管理慢性病的协作平台。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019 Jun 12;17:869-885. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.06.003. eCollection 2019.
2
Blockchain Applications in the Biomedical Domain: A Scoping Review.区块链在生物医学领域的应用:一项范围综述。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019 Feb 8;17:229-240. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.01.010. eCollection 2019.
3
Implementing Blockchains for Efficient Health Care: Systematic Review.
患者在数字健康背景下对知情同意的观点和偏好:最新文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 10;25:e42507. doi: 10.2196/42507.
4
Australian general practitioner perceptions to sharing clinical data for secondary use: a mixed method approach.澳大利亚全科医生对二次使用临床数据共享的看法:混合方法研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jul 1;23(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01759-y.
5
Is blockchain ready for orthopaedics? A systematic review.区块链是否适用于骨科?一项系统评价。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Oct 1;23:101615. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101615. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Managing medicines in the time of COVID-19: implications for community-dwelling people with dementia.管理 COVID-19 期间的药物:对社区居住的痴呆症患者的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Feb;43(1):275-279. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01116-y. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
实施区块链以实现高效医疗保健:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 12;21(2):e12439. doi: 10.2196/12439.
4
How Will the General Data Protection Regulation Affect Healthcare?《通用数据保护条例》将如何影响医疗保健行业?
Acta Med Port. 2018 Aug 31;31(7-8):363-365. doi: 10.20344/amp.10881.
5
FHIRChain: Applying Blockchain to Securely and Scalably Share Clinical Data.FHIRChain:应用区块链安全且可扩展地共享临床数据。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018 Jul 29;16:267-278. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2018.07.004. eCollection 2018.
6
Blockchain for Healthcare: The Next Generation of Medical Records?医疗保健领域的区块链:下一代医疗记录?
J Med Syst. 2018 Aug 10;42(9):172. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1025-3.
7
Blockchain Technology for Healthcare: Facilitating the Transition to Patient-Driven Interoperability.用于医疗保健的区块链技术:助力向患者驱动的互操作性转变。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018 Jun 30;16:224-230. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2018.06.003. eCollection 2018.
8
Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants.迈向“参与2.0”:一项关于生物样本库参与者动态同意的研究见解
Digit Health. 2015 Sep 28;1:2055207615605644. doi: 10.1177/2055207615605644. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
9
Click yes to consent: Acceptability of incorporating informed consent into an internet-based testing program for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections.点击“是”表示同意:将知情同意纳入基于互联网的性传播感染和血源性感染检测项目的可接受性。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
10
OmniPHR: A distributed architecture model to integrate personal health records.全人个人健康记录系统:一种用于整合个人健康记录的分布式架构模型。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Jul;71:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 22.