McNaughton Neil, Smillie Luke D
Department of Psychology and Brain Health Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Personal Neurosci. 2018 Aug 10;1:e11. doi: 10.1017/pen.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
Theories in personality neuroscience must aim to be consistent with several levels of explanation. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the psychological level, we must still make their explanations compatible with observations and theories at lower levels, particularly with what we know at the neural level. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the neural level, we will still need to predict their emergent effects at the psychological level. Personality theory at present treats traits as psychological-level constructs, with even the recent neurally oriented Cybernetic Big Five Theory specified in terms of a "conceptual nervous system" and not requiring complete or immediate translation into neural mechanisms. Here, we argue for the existence of phylogenetically old, neural-level traits that are substantially conserved across many vertebrate species. We first ask what known mechanisms control trait-like properties of neural systems: Focusing on hormones, the GABA receptor, and amine neurotransmitter systems. We derive from what we know about these sources of neuronal modulation some metatheoretical principles to guide the future development of those aspects of personality theory, starting with neural-level trait constructs and drawing implications for higher-level trait psychology observations. Current descriptive approaches such as the Big Five are an essential precursor to personality neuroscience, but may not map one-to-one to the mechanisms and constructs of a neuroscience-based approach to traits.
人格神经科学中的理论必须力求与多个解释层次保持一致。如果我们将人格特质视为仅存在于心理层面的建构,那么我们仍必须使其解释与较低层次的观察结果和理论相兼容,尤其是与我们在神经层面所了解的情况相兼容。如果我们将人格特质视为仅存在于神经层面的建构,我们仍需要预测它们在心理层面产生的影响。目前的人格理论将特质视为心理层面的建构,即使是最近以神经为导向的控制论大五人格理论也是根据“概念神经系统”来界定的,并不要求完全或立即转化为神经机制。在此,我们主张存在在许多脊椎动物物种中基本保守的、系统发育古老的神经层面特质。我们首先要问,已知的哪些机制控制着神经系统的特质样属性:重点关注激素、GABA受体和胺能神经递质系统。我们从我们对这些神经元调节来源的了解中推导出一些元理论原则,以指导人格理论这些方面的未来发展,从神经层面的特质建构入手,并对更高层次的特质心理学观察结果产生影响。当前诸如大五人格之类的描述性方法是人格神经科学的重要先驱,但可能无法与基于神经科学的特质研究方法的机制和建构一一对应。