Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉搭桥手术的评论

Critique of coronary artery bypass surgery.

作者信息

Mullins C B, Lipscomb K

出版信息

Annu Rev Med. 1977;28:271-89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.28.020177.001415.

Abstract

Patients with single-vessel disease, with normal or mildly abnormal ventricular function (EF greater than 40%), have a good prognosis both for natural survival and long-range symptomatic improvement; therefore medical therapy is strongly recommended. Surgery is considered only if symptoms persist after aggressive medical therapy. It is possible that single-vessel left anterior descending disease is a special variant of this group, and surgery may, with further reports, show an increased survival. However, no adequately designed study has yet suggested this, and it is currently our opinion that patients with single-vessel disease do not have an improved survival following surgery. It is not clear whether surgery improves survival in patients with multivessel disease and normal or mildly abnormal ventricular function (EF greater than 40%). Consequently, cardiologists are divided as to whether to advise surgery in these patients solely for survival. Currently, it is our opinion that these patients should have surgery only for improvement of symptoms after failure of medical therapy. In left main coronary disease the evidence favoring improved survival after surgery has convinced most cardiologists, including ourselves, to recommend surgery. Patients with poor ventricular function (EF less than 30%) secondary to coronary artery disease often have congestive heart failure and not angina as their chief symptom. Surgery is usually not advisable for these patients, because of the increased operative mortality and lack of improvement in ventricular function. Patients with poor ventricular function with angina are not usually significantly improved by surgery. In patients with moderately abnormal ventricular function (EF = 30-40%), relief of angina is frequently obtained, but with some added surgical risk. We recommend surgery in these patients after aggressive medical therapy has failed. Patients with unstable angina are initially medically stabilized, after which they are generally managed as stable angina. Patients with persistence of pain at rest in spite of vigorous medical therapy are usually managed by early catheterization and surgery.

摘要

单支血管病变且心室功能正常或轻度异常(射血分数大于40%)的患者,其自然生存率和远期症状改善情况预后良好;因此强烈推荐药物治疗。仅在积极药物治疗后症状仍持续时才考虑手术。单支血管的左前降支病变可能是该组的一种特殊变体,随着更多报告,手术可能显示生存率提高。然而,尚无充分设计的研究表明这一点,目前我们认为单支血管病变患者术后生存率并未提高。对于多支血管病变且心室功能正常或轻度异常(射血分数大于40%)的患者,手术是否能提高生存率尚不清楚。因此,心脏病专家对于是否仅为提高生存率而建议这些患者手术存在分歧。目前,我们认为这些患者仅应在药物治疗失败后为改善症状而进行手术。在左主干冠状动脉疾病中,支持手术可提高生存率的证据已使包括我们在内的大多数心脏病专家建议进行手术。继发于冠状动脉疾病的心室功能差(射血分数小于30%)的患者通常以充血性心力衰竭而非心绞痛为主要症状。由于手术死亡率增加且心室功能无改善,这些患者通常不宜进行手术。伴有心绞痛的心室功能差的患者手术通常无明显改善。对于心室功能中度异常(射血分数=30 - 40%)的患者,心绞痛常可缓解,但会增加一些手术风险。我们建议在积极药物治疗失败后对这些患者进行手术。不稳定型心绞痛患者首先进行药物稳定治疗,之后通常按稳定型心绞痛进行管理。尽管进行了积极药物治疗但仍有静息痛持续的患者通常通过早期导管插入术和手术进行管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验