• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于听力保护装置舒适度的文献综述:舒适度测量变异性分析

A critical review of the literature on comfort of hearing protection devices: analysis of the comfort measurement variability.

作者信息

Doutres Olivier, Sgard Franck, Terroir Jonathan, Perrin Nellie, Jolly Caroline, Gauvin Chantal, Negrini Alessia

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), Canada.

Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), Canada.

出版信息

Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Mar;28(1):447-458. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1772546. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1080/10803548.2020.1772546
PMID:32436466
Abstract

. This article proposes a comprehensive literature review of past works addressing hearing protection device (HPD) comfort with the aim of identifying the main sources of variability in comfort evaluation. . A literature review of study samples was performed: documents were hand searched and Internet searched using PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Professional, Scopus or Google search engines. While comfort constructs and measurement methods are reviewed for both earplugs and earmuff HPD types, results and analyses are provided for earplugs only. . The literature shows that the multiple sources of the perceived comfort measurement variability are related to the complexity of the concept of comfort and to the various physical and psychosocial characteristics of the triad 'environment/person/earplug', which differ from one study to the other. . Considering the current state of knowledge and in order to decrease comfort measurements variability, it is advised to: (a) use a multidimensional construct of comfort and derive a comfort index for each comfort dimension;, (b) use exhaustive and valid questionnaires; (c) quantify as many triad characteristics as possible and use them as independent or control variables; (d) assess the quality of the earplug fitting and the attenuation efficiency.

摘要

本文对以往关于听力保护装置(HPD)舒适度的研究进行了全面的文献综述,旨在确定舒适度评估中变异性的主要来源。 对研究样本进行了文献综述:通过手工检索文献,并使用PubMed、科学网、谷歌学术、ProQuest学位论文与专业论文库、Scopus或谷歌搜索引擎在互联网上进行检索。虽然对耳塞和耳罩式HPD的舒适度构成和测量方法都进行了综述,但结果和分析仅针对耳塞。 文献表明,感知舒适度测量变异性的多个来源与舒适度概念的复杂性以及“环境/人/耳塞”三元组的各种生理和心理社会特征有关,这些特征在不同研究中各不相同。 考虑到当前的知识状态,为了减少舒适度测量的变异性,建议:(a)使用多维舒适度构成,并为每个舒适度维度得出一个舒适度指数;(b)使用详尽且有效的问卷;(c)尽可能多地量化三元组特征,并将其用作自变量或控制变量;(d)评估耳塞佩戴的质量和衰减效率。

相似文献

1
A critical review of the literature on comfort of hearing protection devices: analysis of the comfort measurement variability.关于听力保护装置舒适度的文献综述:舒适度测量变异性分析
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Mar;28(1):447-458. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1772546. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
2
A critical review of the literature on comfort of hearing protection devices: definition of comfort and identification of its main attributes for earplug types.关于听力保护装置舒适度的文献综述:耳塞类型的舒适度定义及其主要属性的确定。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Dec;58(12):824-833. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1646930. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
3
Assessing the comfort of earplugs: development and validation of the French version of the COPROD questionnaire.评估耳塞的舒适度:法语版COPROD问卷的编制与验证
Ergonomics. 2021 Jul;64(7):912-925. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1880027. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.两种耳塞的舒适度与衰减测量之间的关系。
Noise Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;13(51):86-92. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.77193.
5
Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.现实世界中听力保护器衰减测量的变异性。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2006 Oct;50(7):679-91. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mel025. Epub 2006 Jun 16.
6
The influencing factors of hearing protection device usage among noise-exposed workers in Guangdong Province: a structural equation modeling-based survey.广东省噪声暴露工人使用听力保护器的影响因素:基于结构方程模型的调查。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18428-7.
7
Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers.迈向解释工人使用听力保护设备的整体模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 4;19(9):5578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095578.
8
Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.定制耳塞和非定制耳塞多次佩戴时衰减的一致性。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Jun;57(5):571-80. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes096. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
9
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.预防职业性噪声性听力损失的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 7;7(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4.
10
Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.基于真耳中麦克风的个体适配测试在高噪声制造业工人中的听力保护设备。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 6;17(9):3242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093242.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers.迈向解释工人使用听力保护设备的整体模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 4;19(9):5578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095578.