• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低强度经颅超声刺激对内皮素-1 诱导的大鼠大脑中动脉闭塞的神经保护作用。

Neuroprotective effect of low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation in endothelin-1-induced middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats.

机构信息

Graduate School of Hebei Medical University, China.

Qinhuangdao Municipal No. 1 Hospital, China.

出版信息

Brain Res Bull. 2020 Aug;161:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.05.006
PMID:32439337
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ischemic stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation (LITUS) is a promising neuroprotective treatment for ischemic stroke. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can be highly sensitive in the detection of ischemic brain injury. Relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC) values can be used to evaluate the effect of LITUS on ischemic stroke.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the neuroprotective effect of LITUS at different time points using endothelin-1-induced middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats as a model of ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) was injected into the cerebral parenchyma near the middle cerebral artery, which induced focal, reversible, low-flow ischemia in rats. After occlusion of the middle cerebral artery for 30 min, 120 min, and 240 min, LITUS stimulation was used respectively. DWI was performed at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 h after ischemia using a 3 T scanner. The rADC values were calculated, and functional outcomes assessed using neurobehavioral scores after ischemia. Nissl staining and estimation of Na-K-ATPase activity were used to assess the neuropathology after completing the last Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination.

RESULTS

Endothelin-1-induced occlusion of the middle cerebral artery resulted in significant dysfunction and neuronal damage in rats. Rats that received LITUS exhibited reduced damage of the affected brain tissue after cerebral ischemia. The greatest protective effect was found when LITUS stimulation occurred 30 min after cerebral ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging, behavioral, and histological results suggested that LITUS stimulation after an ischemic stroke produced significant neuroprotective effects.

摘要

背景

缺血性中风是全球范围内导致死亡和残疾的主要原因之一。低强度经颅超声刺激(LITUS)是一种有前途的缺血性中风神经保护治疗方法。弥散加权成像(DWI)在检测缺血性脑损伤方面具有高度敏感性。相对表观扩散系数(rADC)值可用于评估 LITUS 对缺血性中风的影响。

目的

本研究旨在使用内皮素-1 诱导的大脑中动脉闭塞作为缺血性中风模型,确定 LITUS 在不同时间点的神经保护作用。

方法

将内皮素-1(ET-1)注入大脑中动脉附近的脑实质中,诱导大鼠局灶性、可逆性、低血流缺血。大脑中动脉闭塞 30 min、120 min 和 240 min 后,分别使用 LITUS 刺激。在缺血后 1、3、6、12、18、24、48 和 72 h 使用 3 T 扫描仪进行 DWI。计算 rADC 值,并在完成最后一次磁共振成像(MRI)检查后使用神经行为评分评估功能结果。尼氏染色和 Na-K-ATPase 活性估计用于评估神经病理学。

结果

内皮素-1 诱导的大脑中动脉闭塞导致大鼠出现明显的功能障碍和神经元损伤。接受 LITUS 治疗的大鼠在脑缺血后表现出受影响脑组织损伤减少。在脑缺血后 30 min 进行 LITUS 刺激时,观察到最大的保护作用。

结论

影像学、行为学和组织学结果表明,缺血性中风后 LITUS 刺激产生了显著的神经保护作用。

相似文献

1
Neuroprotective effect of low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation in endothelin-1-induced middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats.低强度经颅超声刺激对内皮素-1 诱导的大鼠大脑中动脉闭塞的神经保护作用。
Brain Res Bull. 2020 Aug;161:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 18.
2
Protective effect of low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation after differing delay following an acute ischemic stroke.不同延迟时间给予急性缺血性脑卒中后低强度经颅超声刺激的保护作用。
Brain Res Bull. 2019 Mar;146:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
3
Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR at 3.0 T for the evaluation the effect of low-intensity transcranial ultrasound on stroke in a rat model.在3.0T场强下采用读出分段回波平面扩散加权磁共振成像评估低强度经颅超声对大鼠脑卒中模型的影响。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Apr;67:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
4
Neuroprotective effects of low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation combined with Baicalin intervention on traumatic brain injury in animals.低强度经颅超声刺激联合黄芩苷干预对动物创伤性脑损伤的神经保护作用。
Brain Res Bull. 2021 Oct;175:246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.07.028. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
5
Pulsed Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation Immediately After The Ischemic Brain Injury is Neuroprotective.缺血性脑损伤后立即进行脉冲经颅超声刺激具有神经保护作用。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Oct;62(10):2352-7. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2427339. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
6
Delayed treatment with AM-36, a novel neuroprotective agent, reduces neuronal damage after endothelin-1-induced middle cerebral artery occlusion in conscious rats.新型神经保护剂AM-36的延迟治疗可减轻清醒大鼠在内皮素-1诱导的大脑中动脉闭塞后神经元的损伤。
Stroke. 1999 Dec;30(12):2704-12; discussion 2712. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.12.2704.
7
Neuroprotective effect of agmatine in rats with transient cerebral ischemia using MR imaging and histopathologic evaluation.用磁共振成像和组织病理学评估研究胍丁胺对短暂性脑缺血大鼠的神经保护作用。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Sep;31(7):1174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.03.026. Epub 2013 May 1.
8
SB 234551 selective ET(A) receptor antagonism: perfusion/diffusion MRI used to define treatable stroke model, time to treatment and mechanism of protection.SB 234551选择性内皮素A(ET(A))受体拮抗作用:灌注/扩散磁共振成像用于定义可治疗性中风模型、治疗时间及保护机制。
Exp Neurol. 2008 Jul;212(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.03.011. Epub 2008 Mar 25.
9
[Application of diffusion-weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in definition of the ischemic penumbra in hyperacute cerebral infarction].[弥散加权和灌注磁共振成像在超急性脑梗死缺血半暗带定义中的应用]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Jun 10;83(11):952-7.
10
Noninvasive limb remote ischemic preconditioning contributes neuroprotective effects via activation of adenosine A1 receptor and redox status after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats.非侵入性肢体远程缺血预处理通过激活大鼠短暂性局灶性脑缺血后的腺苷 A1 受体和氧化还原状态发挥神经保护作用。
Brain Res. 2012 Jun 12;1459:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.017. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Restoration of Glymphatic Influx After Photothrombotic Stroke Using Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound.使用低强度聚焦超声恢复光血栓性中风后的淋巴系统流入
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025 Jun;31(6):e70451. doi: 10.1111/cns.70451.
2
The effect of combined ultrasound stimulation and gastrodin on seizures in mice.联合超声刺激和天麻素对小鼠癫痫发作的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Nov 22;18:1499078. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1499078. eCollection 2024.
3
Progress of research in the application of ultrasound technology for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
超声技术在阿尔茨海默病治疗中的应用研究进展
Neural Regen Res. 2025 Oct 1;20(10):2823-2837. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00539. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
4
Insight into the pathophysiological advances and molecular mechanisms underlying cerebral stroke: current status.深入了解脑卒中风病理生理学进展和分子机制:现状。
Mol Biol Rep. 2024 May 11;51(1):649. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09597-0.
5
Update on Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Stroke Motor Impairment: A Narrative Review.中风运动功能障碍的非侵入性脑刺激研究进展:一项叙述性综述
Brain Neurorehabil. 2024 Jan 31;17(1):e5. doi: 10.12786/bn.2024.17.e5. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Multimodal evaluation of the effects of low-intensity ultrasound on cerebral blood flow after traumatic brain injury in mice.多模态评价低强度超声对创伤性脑损伤后小鼠脑血流的影响。
BMC Neurosci. 2024 Feb 13;25(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12868-024-00849-0.
7
Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation for Stroke Recovery: A Novel Deep Brain Stimulation Approach for Neurorehabilitation?低强度聚焦超声神经调节用于中风康复:一种用于神经康复的新型深部脑刺激方法?
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2023 Apr 5;4:300-318. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3263690. eCollection 2023.
8
Noninvasive Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Mediates Tissue Protection following Ischemic Stroke.非侵入性低强度聚焦超声介导缺血性中风后的组织保护。
BME Front. 2022 Jul 4;2022:9864910. doi: 10.34133/2022/9864910. eCollection 2022.
9
The Emergence of Functional Ultrasound for Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interface.用于无创脑机接口的功能性超声的出现
Research (Wash D C). 2023 Aug 15;6:0200. doi: 10.34133/research.0200. eCollection 2023.
10
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Neurorehabilitation in Post-Stroke Patients.非侵入性脑刺激用于中风后患者的神经康复
Brain Sci. 2023 Mar 6;13(3):451. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030451.