• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相互的语义预测甚至在场景上下文和对象分离的情况下也能推动它们的分类。

Reciprocal semantic predictions drive categorization of scene contexts and objects even when they are separate.

机构信息

Laboratoire d'Anthropologie et de Psychologie Cliniques, Cognitives et Sociales (LAPCOS), Université Cote d'Azur, Nice, France.

School of Psychology, University of Keele, Keele, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 May 21;10(1):8447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65158-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-65158-y
PMID:32439874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7242336/
Abstract

Visual categorization improves when object-context associations in scenes are semantically consistent, thus predictable from schemas stored in long-term memory. However, it is unclear whether this is due to differences in early perceptual processing, in matching of memory representations or in later stages of response selection. We tested these three concurrent explanations across five experiments. At each trial, participants had to categorize a scene context and an object briefly presented within the same image (Experiment 1), or separately in simultaneous images (Experiments 2-5). We analyzed unilateral (Experiments 1, 3) and bilateral presentations (Experiments 2, 4, 5), and presentations on the screen's horizontal midline (Experiments 1-2) and in the upper and lower visual fields (Experiments 3, 4). In all the experiments, we found a semantic consistency advantage for both context categorization and object categorization. This shows that the memory for object-context semantic associations is activated regardless of whether these two scene components are integrated in the same percept. Our study suggests that the facilitation effect of semantic consistency on categorization occurs at the stage of matching the percept with previous knowledge, supporting the object selection account and extending this framework to an object-context reciprocal influence on matching processes (object-context selection account).

摘要

当场景中的目标-上下文关联在语义上一致时,即可以从长期记忆中存储的模式中预测到,那么视觉分类会得到改善。然而,目前尚不清楚这是由于早期感知处理、记忆表示的匹配还是在反应选择的后期阶段的差异所致。我们在五个实验中测试了这三个同时发生的解释。在每个试验中,参与者必须对场景上下文和在同一图像中短暂呈现的对象进行分类(实验 1),或者在同时呈现的图像中分别进行分类(实验 2-5)。我们分析了单侧(实验 1、3)和双侧呈现(实验 2、4、5),以及屏幕水平中线(实验 1-2)和上下视野(实验 3、4)上的呈现。在所有实验中,我们都发现上下文分类和对象分类都存在语义一致性优势。这表明,无论这两个场景组件是否整合在同一个感知中,对目标-上下文语义关联的记忆都会被激活。我们的研究表明,语义一致性对分类的促进作用发生在将感知与先前知识匹配的阶段,支持对象选择理论,并将该框架扩展到对象-上下文对匹配过程的相互影响(对象-上下文选择理论)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b192/7242336/f837c9e2466a/41598_2020_65158_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b192/7242336/4c954b20069d/41598_2020_65158_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b192/7242336/b5f18fe1e566/41598_2020_65158_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b192/7242336/2723586d7d77/41598_2020_65158_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b192/7242336/f837c9e2466a/41598_2020_65158_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b192/7242336/4c954b20069d/41598_2020_65158_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b192/7242336/b5f18fe1e566/41598_2020_65158_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b192/7242336/2723586d7d77/41598_2020_65158_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b192/7242336/f837c9e2466a/41598_2020_65158_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reciprocal semantic predictions drive categorization of scene contexts and objects even when they are separate.相互的语义预测甚至在场景上下文和对象分离的情况下也能推动它们的分类。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 21;10(1):8447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65158-y.
2
Influence of semantic consistency and perceptual features on visual attention during scene viewing in toddlers.语义一致性和感知特征对幼儿场景观看时视觉注意力的影响。
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Nov;49:248-266. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
3
ObScene database: Semantic congruency norms for 898 pairs of object-scene pictures.ObScene 数据库:898 对物体-场景图片的语义一致性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3058-3071. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02181-7. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.重力重要吗?语义和句法不一致对场景感知过程中注意力分配的影响。
J Vis. 2009 Mar 27;9(3):24.1-15. doi: 10.1167/9.3.24.
5
Face detection in contextual scenes.在上下文场景中进行人脸检测。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 12;19(6):e0304288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304288. eCollection 2024.
6
Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations.用于对象身份及其位置的集成上下文表示。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):371-88. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20027.
7
Speed limits: orientation and semantic context interactions constrain natural scene discrimination dynamics.速度限制:方向与语义背景交互作用限制自然场景辨别动态。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Feb;34(1):56-76. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.56.
8
Exploring the Semantic-Inconsistency Effect in Scenes Using a Continuous Measure of Linguistic-Semantic Similarity.使用语言语义相似度的连续度量来探索场景中的语义不一致效应。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Jun;35(6):623-634. doi: 10.1177/09567976241238217. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
9
Semantic Scene-Object Consistency Modulates N300/400 EEG Components, but Does Not Automatically Facilitate Object Representations.语义场景-物体一致性调节 N300/400 EEG 成分,但不会自动促进物体表征。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Aug 3;32(16):3553-3567. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab433.
10
The roles of scene gist and spatial dependency among objects in the semantic guidance of attention in real-world scenes.场景要点及物体间空间依存关系在现实场景中注意力语义引导方面的作用。
Vision Res. 2014 Dec;105:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of object-scene congruency with and without awareness.有无意识情况下物体-场景一致性的影响。
J Vis. 2025 Jun 2;25(7):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.7.3.
2
Does object-to-scene binding depend on object and scene consistency?物体到场景的绑定是否依赖于物体和场景的一致性?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):899-908. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03037-2. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
3
Predictive processing of scenes and objects.场景和物体的预测性处理。

本文引用的文献

1
No evidence from MVPA for different processes underlying the N300 and N400 incongruity effects in object-scene processing.多变量模式分析未能为客体-场景加工中 N300 和 N400 不和谐效应的不同加工过程提供证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Nov;120:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
2
Are incongruent objects harder to identify? The functional significance of the N300 component.不同的物体更难识别吗?N300 成分的功能意义。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Aug;117:222-232. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
Revealing Detail along the Visual Hierarchy: Neural Clustering Preserves Acuity from V1 to V4.
Nat Rev Psychol. 2024 Jan;3:13-26. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00254-0. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
4
Face detection in contextual scenes.在上下文场景中进行人脸检测。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 12;19(6):e0304288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304288. eCollection 2024.
5
Objects sharpen visual scene representations: evidence from MEG decoding.物体增强视觉场景的表示:来自 MEG 解码的证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Aug 8;33(16):9524-9531. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad222.
6
Disentangling diagnostic object properties for human scene categorization.解析人类场景分类的诊断对象属性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;13(1):5912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32385-y.
7
To Grasp the World at a Glance: The Role of Attention in Visual and Semantic Associative Processing.一览世界:注意力在视觉与语义联想加工中的作用
J Imaging. 2021 Sep 20;7(9):191. doi: 10.3390/jimaging7090191.
8
Searching in CCTV: effects of organisation in the multiplex.闭路电视搜索:多重环境下的组织效果。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Feb 18;6(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00277-2.
沿视觉层级揭示细节:从 V1 到 V4 的神经聚类保持了敏锐度。
Neuron. 2018 Apr 18;98(2):417-428.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
4
Navon's classical paradigm concerning local and global processing relates systematically to visual object classification performance.纳冯的经典范式涉及局部和全局处理,与视觉对象分类性能系统相关。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):324. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18664-5.
5
The elephant in the room: Inconsistency in scene viewing and representation.房间里的大象:场景观看与呈现中的不一致性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Oct;43(10):1717-1743. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000456.
6
Cross-hemispheric collaboration and segregation associated with task difficulty as revealed by structural and functional connectivity.结构和功能连接所揭示的与任务难度相关的跨半球协作与分离
J Neurosci. 2015 May 27;35(21):8191-200. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0464-15.2015.
7
Prediction, context, and competition in visual recognition.视觉识别中的预测、情境与竞争。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:190-8. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12680. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
8
Contextual integration of visual objects necessitates attention.视觉对象的情境整合需要注意力。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Apr;76(3):695-714. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0617-8.
9
The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects.语境场景对物体识别的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1975 Sep;3(5):519-26. doi: 10.3758/BF03197524.
10
Differential electrophysiological signatures of semantic and syntactic scene processing.语义和句法场景处理的差异电生理特征。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1816-23. doi: 10.1177/0956797613476955. Epub 2013 Jul 10.