Haddock Nicholas T, Teotia Sumeet S
Department of Plastic Surgery at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 7;8(4):e2682. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002682. eCollection 2020 Apr.
The ideal form of breast reconstruction provides total permanent restoration of the breast mound. When a deep inferior epigastric (DIEP) flap is not an option or does not provide significant volume, a secondary source must be considered. In our practice, the profunda artery perforator (PAP flap) from the thigh has emerged as a second choice. We present our experience with the first 265 PAP flaps used for breast reconstruction at our institution. We specifically focus on refinements, satisfaction, and functional outcomes.
We conducted a retrospective review of the first 265 PAP flaps at our institution. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. The Breast Q and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were both implemented. Additionally, a satisfaction survey was performed, particularly focused on the donor site.
Two hundred sixty-five consecutive PAP flaps were used to reconstruct 244 breasts in 138 patients. The PAP flap was used for bilateral reconstruction (107 patients) and unilateral breast (30 patients). It was used in combination with a second flap as double PAP (21 patients) or combined with a DIEP (62 patients). Mean flap size was 403 g (range: 190-800 g) and mean patient body mass index was 26.5 (range: 18-43). Complications included total flap loss (3%), donor site cellulitis (4.9%), and significant donor site wound (6.8%). Currently, the PAP flap accounts for 16.9% of our autologous breast reconstruction and the DIEP flap accounts for 76.0%. Lower Extremity Functional Scale score was 75/80 (94%) by 6 months. Satisfaction with breast reconstruction was 78.9% and satisfaction with the thigh was 82.1%.
The PAP flap is an excellent option for autologous breast reconstruction. Success rate and complications are similar to those of other options. There is no significant loss to lower extremity function and satisfaction with the reconstruction is comparable with other options.
理想的乳房重建形式应能完全永久性地恢复乳房外形。当腹壁下深动脉(DIEP)皮瓣不可行或无法提供足够体积时,就必须考虑其他替代方案。在我们的实践中,来自大腿的旋股深动脉穿支(PAP)皮瓣已成为第二选择。我们介绍了在本机构使用的首批265例用于乳房重建的PAP皮瓣的经验。我们特别关注改进措施、患者满意度和功能结果。
我们对本机构的首批265例PAP皮瓣进行了回顾性研究。记录并分析了患者的人口统计学数据、围手术期数据和术后并发症。同时实施了乳房问卷(Breast Q)和下肢功能量表(LEFS)。此外,还进行了一项满意度调查,尤其关注供区情况。
连续265例PAP皮瓣用于为138例患者重建244个乳房。PAP皮瓣用于双侧重建(107例患者)和单侧乳房重建(30例患者)。它还与第二个皮瓣联合使用,作为双PAP皮瓣(21例患者)或与DIEP皮瓣联合使用(62例患者)。皮瓣平均重量为403克(范围:190 - 800克),患者平均体重指数为26.5(范围:18 - 43)。并发症包括皮瓣完全坏死(3%)、供区蜂窝织炎(4.9%)和严重的供区伤口(6.8%)。目前,PAP皮瓣占我们自体乳房重建的16.9%,DIEP皮瓣占76.0%。6个月时下肢功能量表评分为75/80(94%)。乳房重建的满意度为78.9%,大腿供区的满意度为82.1%。
PAP皮瓣是自体乳房重建的一个极佳选择。成功率和并发症与其他选择相似。下肢功能无明显损失,重建的满意度与其他选择相当。