• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激光减轻术后疤痕:综述

Mitigation of Postsurgical Scars Using Lasers: A Review.

作者信息

Artzi Ofir, Friedman Or, Al-Niaimi Firas, Wolf Yoram, Mehrabi Joseph N

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

The Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 24;8(4):e2746. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002746. eCollection 2020 Apr.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002746
PMID:32440416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7209879/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most postsurgical scars are considered esthetically and functionally acceptable. Currently, there is no definite consensus treatment for postsurgical scarring. The purpose of this review is to shed some light on the value of scar mitigation and the efficacy of different lasers employed on postsurgical wounds.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and computational analysis were conducted to identify relevant clinical articles that pertained to the use of lasers for mitigating postsurgical scars. Articles included the National Institutes of Health-National Center for Biotechnology Information-PubMed search and sources cited from relevant studies after 1995. Trials that attributed pre- and posttreatment scores of scar severity based on a verified scar evaluation scale (eg, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Vancouver Scar Scale, Global Assessment Scale) were chosen. Clinical assessments varied for each study. To adequately assess the efficacy of the modalities, the final scaled scar appearance scores were realigned and normalized to a standard scale for unbiased comparison.

RESULTS

After filtering through a total of 124 studies, 14 relevant studies were isolated and thus included in the review. Studied lasers were as follows: Pulsed dye laser (PDL), carbon dioxide, diode, potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP), and erbium glass (Er-Glass) lasers.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with lasers in the postsurgical wound healing phase is safe, effective, and advised in mitigation of pathologic scar formation.

摘要

背景

大多数术后瘢痕在美观和功能上被认为是可以接受的。目前,对于术后瘢痕形成尚无明确的共识性治疗方法。本综述的目的是阐明减轻瘢痕的价值以及不同激光用于术后伤口的疗效。

方法

进行了一项系统的文献综述和计算分析,以确定与使用激光减轻术后瘢痕相关的临床文章。文章包括美国国立医学图书馆 - 国家生物技术信息中心 - PubMed搜索以及1995年后相关研究引用的来源。选择了根据经过验证的瘢痕评估量表(例如,患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表、温哥华瘢痕量表、整体评估量表)得出瘢痕严重程度治疗前和治疗后评分的试验。每个研究的临床评估各不相同。为了充分评估这些方法的疗效,将最终的瘢痕外观量表评分重新调整并标准化为一个标准量表,以便进行无偏比较。

结果

在筛选了总共124项研究后,分离出14项相关研究并纳入本综述。所研究的激光如下:脉冲染料激光(PDL)、二氧化碳激光、二极管激光、磷酸钛钾(KTP)激光和铒玻璃(Er-Glass)激光。

结论

在术后伤口愈合阶段使用激光治疗对于减轻病理性瘢痕形成是安全、有效的,并且是建议采用的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7212/7209879/836cee8bd2af/gox-8-e2746-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7212/7209879/fd10509e413a/gox-8-e2746-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7212/7209879/037303d36392/gox-8-e2746-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7212/7209879/836cee8bd2af/gox-8-e2746-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7212/7209879/fd10509e413a/gox-8-e2746-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7212/7209879/037303d36392/gox-8-e2746-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7212/7209879/836cee8bd2af/gox-8-e2746-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Mitigation of Postsurgical Scars Using Lasers: A Review.激光减轻术后疤痕:综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 24;8(4):e2746. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002746. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Comparison of 532 nm Potassium Titanyl Phosphate Laser and 595 nm Pulsed Dye Laser in the Treatment of Erythematous Surgical Scars: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Study.532 纳米磷酸钛氧钾激光与 595 纳米脉冲染料激光治疗红斑性手术瘢痕的比较:一项随机、对照、开放标签研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2016 Jan;42(1):70-6. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000582.
3
[Clinical comparative study of pulsed dye laser and ultra-pulsed fractional carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of hypertrophic scars after burns].脉冲染料激光与超脉冲分次二氧化碳激光治疗烧伤后增生性瘢痕的临床对比研究
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 20;34(9):603-607. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.009.
4
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Nonablative Fractional Laser versus Pulsed-Dye Laser in Thyroidectomy Scar Prevention.非剥脱性分次激光与脉冲染料激光在预防甲状腺切除术后瘢痕方面的有效性比较。
Ann Dermatol. 2014 Oct;26(5):615-20. doi: 10.5021/ad.2014.26.5.615. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
5
Early laser intervention to reduce scar formation - a systematic review.早期激光干预以减少瘢痕形成 - 系统评价。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Jul;32(7):1099-1110. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14856. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Comparison of the effects of short- and long-pulse durations when using a 585-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of new surgical scars.比较 585nm 脉冲染料激光短脉宽和长脉宽治疗新鲜手术瘢痕的疗效。
Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Jan;25(1):121-6. doi: 10.1007/s10103-009-0710-3. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
7
Effects of early combinatorial treatment of autologous split-thickness skin grafts in red duroc pig model using pulsed dye laser and fractional CO laser.在红色杜洛克猪模型中使用脉冲染料激光和剥脱性二氧化碳激光对自体中厚皮片进行早期联合治疗的效果
Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Jan;50(1):78-87. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22702. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
8
[Clinical effects of sequential laser treatments on early stage hypertrophic burn scars].序贯激光治疗对早期增生性烧伤瘢痕的临床疗效
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 20;34(9):615-623. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.011.
9
Microneedling Outcomes in Early Postsurgical Scars.微针治疗早期手术后瘢痕的效果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Sep 1;150(3):557e-561e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009466. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
10
Efficacy of combined treatment with intense pulsed light and fractional erbium:YAG Laser in scar prevention: A randomized split wound trial.强脉冲光联合铒激光治疗预防瘢痕的疗效:一项随机分割伤口试验。
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Sep;34(5):e15061. doi: 10.1111/dth.15061. Epub 2021 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Photobiomodulation as Medicine: Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) for Acute Tissue Injury or Sport Performance Recovery.光生物调节作为医学手段:低强度激光疗法(LLLT)用于急性组织损伤或运动表现恢复
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Sep 27;9(4):181. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040181.
2
The Comparison of 940nm and 810nm Diode Laser Effects on the Repair of Inferior Alveolar Sensory Nerve Injury: A Clinical Trial.940纳米与810纳米二极管激光对下牙槽感觉神经损伤修复效果的比较:一项临床试验
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Sep 1;25(3):215-222. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97393.2013. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Evaluation of combining ultrapulse CO with fractional CO laser for the treatment of atrophic scars in Asians.

本文引用的文献

1
Early intervention with pulse dye and CO ablative fractional lasers to improve cutaneous scarring post-lumpectomy: a randomized controlled trial on the impact of intervention on final cosmesis.早期应用脉冲染料和 CO2 消融性点阵激光改善保乳术后皮肤瘢痕:一项关于干预对最终美容效果影响的随机对照试验。
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Dec;34(9):1881-1887. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02788-3. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
2
Effectiveness of Early Laser Treatment in Surgical Scar Minimization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.早期激光治疗在减少手术瘢痕中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Mar;46(3):402-410. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001887.
3
超脉冲 CO2 联合点阵 CO2 激光治疗亚洲人萎缩性瘢痕的疗效评价。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Mar 8;39(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04012-3.
4
The impact on quality-of-life following treatment of surgical facial scars with laser-based therapy: a scoping review.基于激光的疗法治疗面部手术疤痕对生活质量的影响:范围综述。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Dec 16;316(1):47. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02779-z.
5
Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: Advances in Treatment and Review of Established Therapies.增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩:治疗进展及现有疗法综述
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Mar;24(2):225-245. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00744-6. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
6
Laser Resurfacing for the Management of Periorbital Scarring.激光表面重塑治疗眶周瘢痕
Plast Aesthet Res. 2020;7. doi: 10.20517/2347-9264.2020.77. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
Early laser intervention to reduce scar formation - a systematic review.
早期激光干预以减少瘢痕形成 - 系统评价。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Jul;32(7):1099-1110. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14856. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Optimizing Postsurgical Scars: A Systematic Review on Best Practices in Preventative Scar Management.优化术后瘢痕:预防性瘢痕管理最佳实践的系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6):782e-793e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003894.
5
Inflammatory responses, matrix remodeling, and re-epithelialization after fractional CO laser treatment of scars.二氧化碳点阵激光治疗瘢痕后的炎症反应、基质重塑和再上皮化
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Sep;49(7):675-685. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22666. Epub 2017 May 10.
6
Combination laser treatment for immediate post-surgical scars: a retrospective analysis of 33 immature scars.联合激光治疗术后即刻瘢痕:33例未成熟瘢痕的回顾性分析
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jul;32(5):1111-1119. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2215-9. Epub 2017 May 2.
7
Peri-Procedure Laser Scar Therapy Protocol: A Pilot Survey of Plastic Surgeons' Practices.围手术期激光瘢痕治疗方案:整形外科医生实践的初步调查。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;41(3):689-694. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0862-7. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
8
A 1-Year Follow-Up of Post-operative Scars After the Use of a 1210-nm Laser-Assisted Skin Healing (LASH) Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial.1210nm 激光辅助皮肤愈合(LASH)技术治疗后术后疤痕的 1 年随访:一项随机对照试验。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017 Aug;41(4):938-948. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0820-4. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
9
Early use of CO lasers and silicone gel on surgical scars: Prospective study.早期使用CO激光和硅胶凝胶治疗手术瘢痕:前瞻性研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Aug;49(6):570-576. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22634. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
10
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Pulsed Dye Laser Treatment, CO Ablative Fractional Resurfacing, and Combined Treatment for Surgical Scar Clearance.脉冲染料激光治疗、CO2 剥脱性点阵激光治疗及联合治疗清除手术瘢痕的安全性和有效性评估
J Drugs Dermatol. 2016 Nov 1;15(11):1315-1319.