Suppr超能文献

供者来源不同的造血干细胞移植在儿童急性白血病中的应用:GRFS 与 CRFS 的比较

GRFS and CRFS in alternative donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for pediatric patients with acute leukemia.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Blood Adv. 2019 May 14;3(9):1441-1449. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018030171.

Abstract

We report graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (a composite end point of survival without grade III-IV acute GVHD [aGVHD], systemic therapy-requiring chronic GVHD [cGVHD], or relapse) and cGVHD-free relapse-free survival (CRFS) among pediatric patients with acute leukemia (n = 1613) who underwent transplantation with 1 antigen-mismatched (7/8) bone marrow (BM; n = 172) or umbilical cord blood (UCB; n = 1441). Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards models. To account for multiple testing, < .01 for the donor/graft variable was considered statistically significant. Clinical characteristics were similar between UCB and 7/8 BM recipients, because most had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (62%), 64% received total body irradiation-based conditioning, and 60% received anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab. Methotrexate-based GVHD prophylaxis was more common with 7/8 BM (79%) than with UCB (15%), in which mycophenolate mofetil was commonly used. The univariate estimates of GRFS and CRFS were 22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16-29) and 27% (95% CI, 20-34), respectively, with 7/8 BM and 33% (95% CI, 31-36) and 38% (95% CI, 35-40), respectively, with UCB ( < .001). In multivariate analysis, 7/8 BM vs UCB had similar GRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87-1.45; = .39), CRFS (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.38; = .66), overall survival (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.80-1.44; = .66), and relapse (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03-2.02; = .03). However, the 7/8 BM group had a significantly higher risk for grade III-IV aGVHD (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.16-2.48; = .006) compared with the UCB group. UCB and 7/8 BM groups had similar outcomes, as measured by GRFS and CRFS. However, given the higher risk for grade III-IV aGVHD, UCB might be preferred for patients lacking matched donors.

摘要

我们报告了在接受 1 个抗原不匹配(7/8)骨髓(BM;n=172)或脐带血(UCB;n=1441)移植的儿童急性白血病患者(n=1613)中,无 III-IV 级急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)[aGVHD]、需要系统治疗的慢性 GVHD(cGVHD)或复发的移植物抗宿主病-无复发存活率(GRFS)(无 III-IV 级 aGVHD、需要系统治疗的 cGVHD 或复发的生存的复合终点)和无 cGVHD 复发存活率(CRFS)。采用 Cox 比例风险模型进行多变量分析。为了进行多次检验,<.01 的供体/移植物变量被认为具有统计学意义。UCB 和 7/8 BM 受者的临床特征相似,因为大多数患者患有急性淋巴细胞白血病(62%),64%接受基于全身照射的预处理,60%接受抗胸腺细胞球蛋白或阿仑单抗。与 UCB(15%)相比,7/8 BM 中更常见甲氨蝶呤为基础的 GVHD 预防(79%),其中更常使用霉酚酸酯。7/8 BM 和 UCB 的单变量 GRFS 和 CRFS 估计值分别为 22%(95%置信区间[CI],16-29)和 27%(95% CI,20-34),分别为 33%(95% CI,31-36)和 38%(95% CI,35-40),分别为 7/8 BM 和 UCB(<.001)。在多变量分析中,7/8 BM 与 UCB 的 GRFS 相似(风险比[HR],1.12;95%CI,0.87-1.45; =.39)、CRFS(HR,1.06;95%CI,0.82-1.38; =.66)、总生存(HR,1.07;95%CI,0.80-1.44; =.66)和复发(HR,1.44;95%CI,1.03-2.02; =.03)。然而,与 UCB 组相比,7/8 BM 组 III-IV 级 aGVHD 的风险显著更高(HR,1.70;95%CI,1.16-2.48; =.006)。UCB 和 7/8 BM 组的 GRFS 和 CRFS 结果相似。然而,鉴于 III-IV 级 aGVHD 的风险较高,对于缺乏匹配供体的患者,UCB 可能是首选。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36fa/6517657/9003b90c3a01/advances030171absf1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验