Ji Mingxia, Hong Xiaofei, Chen Mengyan, Chen Tiejiang, Wang Jiao, Zhang Ning
Department of Emergency.
Department of Science and Education.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20303. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020303.
The role of dietary inflammatory index (DII) in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and mortality is still controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies aimed to evaluate the effect of DII, indicating a pro-inflammatory diet, on the incidence and mortality of CVD.
A comprehensive literature search of articles published through August 2019 was performed in Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science. The pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for highest vs lowest DII in relation to CVD risk or mortality were estimated using a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. The heterogeneity among studies was tested using Cochran's Q test and I statistic.
A total of 15 cohort studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. The highest DII score was significantly associated with a higher risk of CVD incidence (RR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.12-1.78) or mortality (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.19-1.44), compared with the lowest DII score. There was statistically significant heterogeneity among the studies on the association between DII and CVD mortality (P < .001; I = 70.8%). No obvious heterogeneity was observed among the studies on the association between DII and CVD risk (P = .160; I = 37.0%). In the sensitivity analysis, exclusion of any single study did not materially alter the pooled RRs.
The present systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that a higher DII score is related to a higher risk of CVD. Further well-designed prospective cohort or trials are warranted to validate our preliminary findings.
饮食炎症指数(DII)在心血管疾病(CVD)风险和死亡率中的作用仍存在争议。这项队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估表明促炎饮食的DII对CVD发病率和死亡率的影响。
在Medline、EMBASE和Web of Science中对截至2019年8月发表的文章进行了全面的文献检索。使用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型估计最高与最低DII相对于CVD风险或死亡率的合并相对风险(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。使用Cochran's Q检验和I统计量检验研究间的异质性。
本荟萃分析最终纳入了15项队列研究。与最低DII评分相比,最高DII评分与CVD发病率(RR = 1.41,95% CI 1.12 - 1.78)或死亡率(RR = 1.31,95% CI 1.19 - 1.44)的较高风险显著相关。关于DII与CVD死亡率之间关联的研究存在统计学显著异质性(P <.001;I = 70.8%)。关于DII与CVD风险之间关联的研究未观察到明显异质性(P =.160;I = 37.0%)。在敏感性分析中,排除任何一项单独研究均未实质性改变合并RRs。
本系统评价和荟萃分析表明,较高的DII评分与较高的CVD风险相关。需要进一步设计良好的前瞻性队列研究或试验来验证我们的初步发现。