医护人员对冠状病毒风险的经历与认知：一项系统评价方案
Experiences and perceptions risk of health-care workers from coronavirus: A protocol for systematic review.
作者信息
Chen Peng, Lei Jiexin, Chen Fuchao, Zhou Benhong
机构信息
Department of Pharmacy.
Department of Endocrinology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan.
出版信息
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20308. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020308.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against coronavirus. Understanding and managing their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks. However, the experiences and perceptions risk of HCWs from coronavirus still remains to be controversial. Thus, the objective of this review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize available evidence related to the experiences and perceptions of risk of HCWs from coronavirus.
METHODS
The studies were gathered from PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CBMdisc, CNKI, WKSP, CSJFT, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO, along with several sources of gray literature. The retrieval of full-text studies, data extraction, and quality assessment of the included studies will be independently conducted by 2 reviewers. The meta-aggregative will be used for findings pooling and a summary of ConQual findings tables will be presented in future.
RESULTS
This study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.
CONCLUSION
The literature will provide a high-quality analysis of the current evidence to assess the experiences and perceptions risk of health-care workers from coronavirus.
REGISTRATION INFORMATION
CRD42020170388.
摘要
背景
医护人员在抗击新冠病毒的战斗中处于前线。了解并应对他们的恐惧和焦虑可能为应对未来疫情提供经验教训。然而，医护人员对新冠病毒的经历和风险认知仍存在争议。因此，本综述的目的是识别、评估和综合与医护人员对新冠病毒的经历和风险认知相关的现有证据。
方法
研究从PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、CBMdisc、中国知网、万方数据、维普资讯、谷歌学术和PsycINFO以及几个灰色文献来源收集。纳入研究的全文检索、数据提取和质量评估将由两名评审员独立进行。将使用元聚合进行结果汇总，未来将呈现ConQual结果表的总结。
结果
本研究将提交给同行评审期刊发表。
结论
该文献将对当前证据进行高质量分析，以评估医护人员对新冠病毒的经历和风险认知。
注册信息
CRD42020170388。
相似文献
1
Experiences and perceptions risk of health-care workers from coronavirus: A protocol for systematic review.医护人员对冠状病毒风险的经历与认知：一项系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20308. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020308.
2
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后，为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施：一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
3
Risk factors for COVID-19 among healthcare workers. A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.医护人员中新型冠状病毒肺炎的危险因素。一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0250958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250958. eCollection 2021.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区，服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中，叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Experiences and perceptions of emergency department nurses regarding people who present with mental health issues: a systematic review protocol.急诊科护士对有心理健康问题患者的经验与看法：一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Sep;17(9):1877-1882. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00004.
6
Parents and health professionals' experiences and perceptions of blended feeding in tube-fed children: a qualitative systematic review protocol.父母和健康专业人员对管饲儿童混合喂养的经验和看法：定性系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Jul 1;19(7):1705-1712. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00230.
7
Experiences of healthcare providers during the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on them: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review.《冠状病毒大流行期间医护人员的经历及其对他们的影响：一项混合方法系统评价议定书》。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 26;11(2):e043686. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043686.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树：影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of communicating with people over 50 years of age about vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员与50岁以上人群就疫苗接种进行沟通的认知与经历：一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013706. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013706.pub2.
10
Perceptions of families and healthcare providers about feeding preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: protocol for a qualitative systematic review.家庭和医疗保健提供者对早产儿在新生儿重症监护病房喂养的看法：定性系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 21;14(6):e084884. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084884.
引用本文的文献
1
From Acute Phase to Long COVID: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Epidemiological Profile and Clinical Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Employees at a Pediatric Hospital.从急性期到长期新冠：一家儿童医院员工中新冠病毒感染的流行病学特征与临床评估的横断面研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 27;12(13):4325. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134325.
2
Factors associated with anxiety symptoms among medical laboratory professionals in Khobar: Single institution study.沙特胡拜尔地区医学检验科专业人员焦虑症状相关因素：单机构研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;10:917619. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917619. eCollection 2022.
3
Healthcare Professionals Providing Direct Care to the COVID-19 Patients: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.直接护理 COVID-19 患者的医疗保健专业人员：描述性横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Feb 15;60(246):160-166. doi: 10.31729/jnma.6101.
4
Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, practices and lived experiences of frontline health workers in the times of COVID-19 : a qualitative study from Bangladesh.在 COVID-19 时期探索一线卫生工作者的知识、态度、实践和生活经历：来自孟加拉国的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):e051893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051893.
5
Potential Cross-Reactive Immunity to COVID-19 Infection in Individuals With Laboratory-Confirmed MERS-CoV Infection: A National Retrospective Cohort Study From Saudi Arabia.在沙特阿拉伯进行的一项全国性回顾性队列研究：实验室确诊中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒感染个体对 COVID-19 感染的潜在交叉反应性免疫。
Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 17;12:727989. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.727989. eCollection 2021.
6
Knowledge, Attitude, and Perceived Risks Towards COVID-19 Pandemic and the Impact of Risk Communication Messages on Healthcare Workers in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯医护人员对COVID-19大流行的认知、态度和感知风险以及风险沟通信息的影响
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jul 5;14:2811-2824. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S306402. eCollection 2021.
7
Sleep patterns among Norwegian nurses between the first and second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.挪威护士在新冠疫情第一波和第二波期间的睡眠模式。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jun 21;20(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00628-w.
本文引用的文献
1
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.中国武汉地区 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染患者的临床特征。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
2
Risk of Potential Exposure Incident in Non-healthcare Workers in Contact with Infectious and Municipal Waste.接触传染性废物和城市垃圾的非医护人员发生潜在暴露事件的风险。
Zdr Varst. 2018 Apr 6;57(2):65-71. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2018-0009. eCollection 2018 Jun.
3
Infectious disease transmission: survey of contacts between hospital-based healthcare workers and working adults from the general population.传染病传播：基于医院的医护人员与一般人群中的在职成年人之间接触情况的调查。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Apr;98(4):404-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
4
Everyday Dangers - The Impact Infectious Disease has on the Health of Paramedics: A Scoping Review.日常危险——传染病对护理人员健康的影响：一项范围综述
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Apr;32(2):217-223. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001497. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
5
Mandating influenza vaccinations for health care workers: analysing opportunities for policy change using Kingdon's agenda setting framework.强制医护人员接种流感疫苗：运用金登议程设置框架分析政策变革的机遇
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 29;16(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1772-0.
6
Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach.建立对定性研究综合结果的信心：ConQual方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Sep 20;14:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-108.
7
Knowledge, attitudes, experience and behaviour of frontline health care workers during the early phase of 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic, Birmingham, UK.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1):26-30. doi: 10.1177/1355819614554243. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
8
Nurses' perceptions of risk from emerging respiratory infectious diseases: a Singapore study.护士对新出现的呼吸道传染病风险的认知：一项新加坡的研究。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):195-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02018.x.
9
The experience of general nurses in rural Australian emergency departments.农村地区澳大利亚急诊部门普通护士的体验。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2012 Jan;12(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 28.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目：PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Zotero 插件