Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Center for Liver Diseases, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct;19(10):2015-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 May 20.
Medical innovation and ethical dilemmas are intertwined in gastroenterology and hepatology. This narrative review explores direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a touchstone example of how medical innovation breeds ethical dilemmas. A few quandaries-informed consent as well as informed deferral during the first wave of DAA approvals, sobriety restrictions from payors, and high DAA costs for patients-are addressed through the lens of the foundational principles of clinical medical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and utility. By placing these issues within a medical ethics framework, we hope not only to focus on the solutions that the gastroenterology and hepatology community developed in the advent of DAA therapy, but to highlight an ethical paradigm that can be applied to similar dilemmas that will be faced as new therapies for other gastrointestinal diseases are approved.
医学创新与伦理困境在胃肠病学和肝脏病学中相互交织。本叙事综述以直接作用抗病毒(DAA)疗法治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)为例,探讨了医学创新如何引发伦理困境。一些难题——包括 DAA 获批的第一波浪潮中的知情同意和知情推迟、支付方的清醒限制以及患者的高 DAA 费用——通过临床医学伦理的基本原则(自主性、善行、不伤害、公正和效用)来解决。通过将这些问题置于医学伦理框架内,我们不仅希望关注胃肠病学和肝脏病学领域在 DAA 治疗出现时所制定的解决方案,而且还希望强调一种伦理范式,该范式可应用于随着其他胃肠道疾病治疗方法的获批而面临的类似困境。