• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工营养和水合的伦理问题和困境。

Ethical issues and dilemmas in artificial nutrition and hydration.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Research Institute on Nutrition, Genetics and Metabolism, Universidad El Bosque, Carrera 7 No. 117 - 15, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Feb;41:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.12.010. Epub 2020 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.12.010
PMID:33487269
Abstract

When the natural oral intake of food and liquids is disturbed the role of caregivers is to assist the patient in order to cover the individual's need for nutrition by nutrition therapy. Nutrition therapy is a medical intervention, which requires an indication for achieving a treatment goal and the informed consent of the competent patient. Withholding and withdrawing nutrition therapy and artificial hydration must be evaluated in specific situations (terminally ill, palliative care, dementia, aged patients) and always case by case according to the patients' cultural and spiritual needs. In the case of ethical issues or dilemmas, application of the four principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice is recommended. These principles assist the caregiver in the decision as whether to feed or not to feed. Caregivers must emphasize the right to self-determination and thus to respect the autonomy of the patient, and also the particular vulnerability of the patient suffering from or at risk of malnutrition. Caregivers must be ethically capable of responding to the nutritional needs according to the patient's will and desires even if the patient is not capable of self-determination, always looking for the best benefit to the patient and avoiding harm.

摘要

当患者正常的饮食摄入受到干扰时,护理人员的职责是协助患者,通过营养治疗来满足其个体的营养需求。营养治疗是一种医疗干预措施,需要有治疗目标的适应证,并获得有能力做出决定的患者的知情同意。在特定情况下(终末期疾病、姑息治疗、痴呆、老年患者)必须评估停止和终止营养治疗和人工补液,并始终根据患者的文化和精神需求进行个案评估。在涉及伦理问题或困境时,建议应用自主、善行、不伤害和公正这四项原则。这些原则可以帮助护理人员决定是否喂养。护理人员必须强调自决权,从而尊重患者的自主权,同时也要尊重患有或有营养不良风险的患者的特殊脆弱性。护理人员必须在道德上能够根据患者的意愿和需求来满足其营养需求,即使患者没有能力自主决定,始终寻求对患者最有利的结果,并避免伤害。

相似文献

1
Ethical issues and dilemmas in artificial nutrition and hydration.人工营养和水合的伦理问题和困境。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Feb;41:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.12.010. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
2
ESPEN guideline on ethical aspects of artificial nutrition and hydration.欧洲临床营养和代谢学会(ESPEN)关于人工营养与水化伦理问题的指南
Clin Nutr. 2016 Jun;35(3):545-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
Ethical issues in artificial nutrition and hydration: a review.人工营养和水合的伦理问题:综述。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Jan-Feb;34(1):79-88. doi: 10.1177/0148607109347209. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
4
Islamic views on artificial nutrition and hydration in terminally ill patients.伊斯兰教关于终末期患者的人工营养和水合作用的观点。
Bioethics. 2014 Feb;28(2):96-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01996.x. Epub 2012 Jul 29.
5
The ethics of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration in adults and the role of the advanced clinical practitioner.成人临床辅助营养和水合的伦理问题以及高级临床医师的作用。
Br J Nurs. 2024 Jul 4;33(13):S14-S24. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2024.0098.
6
Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception.尊重患有慢性精神疾病的女性在避孕决策方面的自主权。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;44(7):671-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.7.671.
7
Ethical dilemmas concerning autonomy when persons with dementia wish to live at home: a qualitative, hermeneutic study.痴呆症患者希望居家生活时自主权方面的伦理困境:一项质性诠释学研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 19;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1217-1.
8
Enteral and parenteral nutrition support of terminally ill patients: practical and ethical perspectives.晚期患者的肠内和肠外营养支持:实践与伦理视角
Hosp J. 1993;9(2-3):107-29. doi: 10.1080/0742-969x.1993.11882772.
9
To What Extent Does Clinically Assisted Nutrition and Hydration Have a Role in the Care of Dying People?在临终关怀中,临床辅助营养和水合作用的作用有多大?
J Palliat Care. 2020 Oct;35(4):209-216. doi: 10.1177/0825859720907426. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
10
Ethical principles in health research and review process.健康研究中的伦理原则与审查过程。
Acta Trop. 2009 Nov;112 Suppl 1:S2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.031. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Challenges in Research Involving Hospitalized Patients: A Phenomenological Study.涉及住院患者的研究中的伦理挑战:一项现象学研究。
Health Care Anal. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s10728-025-00534-1.
2
Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Toward Providing Artificial Nutrition and Hydration for Patients With Terminal Cancer.医疗保健专业人员对为晚期癌症患者提供人工营养和水分补充的知识、态度及实践
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Jun;38(3):e70060. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70060.
3
The attitudes and knowledge of family physicians regarding malnutrition in the elderly: a call for action.
家庭医生对老年人营养不良的态度和知识:行动呼吁。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Sep 2;13(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00631-x.
4
A Holistic Approach for Ethics and Sustainability in the Food Chain: The Gateway to Oral and Systemic Health.食物链中伦理与可持续性的整体方法:通往口腔与全身健康之路。
Foods. 2024 Apr 17;13(8):1224. doi: 10.3390/foods13081224.
5
Nutrition care is an integral part of patient-centred medical care: a European consensus.营养护理是以患者为中心的医疗护理的一个组成部分:欧洲共识。
Med Oncol. 2023 Mar 7;40(4):112. doi: 10.1007/s12032-023-01955-5.
6
The Prevalence and Indications of Intravenous Rehydration Therapy in Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review.医院环境中静脉补液治疗的患病率及适应证:一项系统评价
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2022 Dec 31;4(1):18-32. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia4010002.
7
A qualitative systematic review of family caregivers' experiences of artificial nutrition and hydration at home: A meta-ethnography.一项关于家庭照顾者在家中接受人工营养和水合作用的体验的定性系统评价:荟萃民族志。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jul;57(4):717-736. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12726. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
8
Ethical Issues in Care and Treatment of Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinoses (NCL)-A Personal View.神经元蜡样脂褐质沉积症(NCL)护理与治疗中的伦理问题——个人观点
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 25;12:692527. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.692527. eCollection 2021.