• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《员工对强制手段量表》(SACS)- 波兰语版。

The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) - Polish adaptation.

机构信息

Wyższa Szkoła Bankowa w Toruniu.

Dolnośląskie Centrum Zdrowia Psychicznego Sp. z o.o. we Wrocławiu.

出版信息

Psychiatr Pol. 2020 Feb 29;54(1):113-124. doi: 10.12740/PP/102438.

DOI:10.12740/PP/102438
PMID:32447360
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to prepare the Polish adaptation of the SACS. The scale is a self-assessment tool designed to measure staff attitudes towards direct coercion of psychiatric wards patients.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 120 adults, staff from 7 psychiatric wards. The SACS is a tool created in Norway by Tonje Husum, comprising of 15 items describing psychiatric healthcare professionals attitudes towards direct coercion. The validation procedure incorporated three basic methods to be applied in the reliability analysis - the comparison of double tests with the same method, the analysis of statistical properties of test items as well as analysis of the relation of test items and subscales with the general test result.

RESULTS

After a "think aloud" type pilot study and a language validation, the internal consistency was assessed. The Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.57 to 0.81 in the subscales, and it was 0.82 for the total score. The best solution obtained in exploratory factor analysis was a three-factor model, almost identical to the original one, confirming the division into three subscales: coercion as offending (critical attitude), as care and security (pragmatic attitude) and as treatment (positive attitude).

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric characteristics of the Polish adaptation of the SACS are similar to those reported in the original version. The results allow to recommend the method for scientific research. However, further analyses are necessary to assess validity and discriminative power in larger settings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在编制波兰语版 SACS。该量表是一种自评工具,旨在衡量工作人员对精神科病房患者直接强制的态度。

方法

该样本由来自 7 个精神科病房的 120 名成年人组成。SACS 是由挪威的 Tonje Husum 创建的工具,由 15 个项目组成,描述了精神科医护人员对直接强制的态度。验证程序采用了三种基本方法进行可靠性分析——使用相同方法进行两次测试的比较、测试项目的统计属性分析以及测试项目与子量表与总测试结果的关系分析。

结果

经过“出声思考”式试点研究和语言验证后,评估了内部一致性。子量表的克朗巴赫 α 系数范围为 0.57 至 0.81,总分为 0.82。探索性因素分析得到的最佳解决方案是三因素模型,几乎与原始模型相同,证实了分为三个子量表:作为冒犯的强制(批判态度)、作为护理和安全的强制(实用态度)以及作为治疗的强制(积极态度)。

结论

波兰语版 SACS 的心理计量学特征与原始版本报告的特征相似。结果允许推荐该方法用于科学研究。然而,需要进一步的分析来评估在更大范围内的有效性和区分力。

相似文献

1
The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) - Polish adaptation.《员工对强制手段量表》(SACS)- 波兰语版。
Psychiatr Pol. 2020 Feb 29;54(1):113-124. doi: 10.12740/PP/102438.
2
The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS): reliability, validity and feasibility.员工对强制手段的态度量表(SACS):信度、效度与可行性
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Oct-Nov;31(5):417-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
3
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale.员工对强制手段态度量表土耳其语版的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 29;12(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02013-z.
4
Measuring Staff Attitudes to Coercion in Poland.衡量波兰员工对强制手段的态度。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 16;12:745215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.745215. eCollection 2021.
5
"Coercion Experience Scale" (CES)--validation of a questionnaire on coercive measures.“强制经验量表”(CES)——关于强制性措施的问卷验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Jan 14;10:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-5.
6
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the staff attitude to coercion scale: an exploratory factor analysis.意大利版工作人员对强制态度量表的心理测量特性:探索性因素分析
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 24;14:1172803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1172803. eCollection 2023.
7
Psychometric validation of Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale in the Polish population.科拉牙科焦虑量表在波兰人群中的心理测量学验证
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020 Jan;29(1):45-49. doi: 10.17219/acem/111818.
8
Coercion in psychiatry: psychometric validation of the Portuguese Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS).精神病学中的强制手段:葡萄牙员工对强制手段态度量表(SACS)的心理测量学验证
Discov Ment Health. 2024 Aug 14;4(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00083-4.
9
Development of the Japanese version of Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale.《日本版工作人员对强制手段态度量表》的编制
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 17;13:1026676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1026676. eCollection 2022.
10
Communication skills attitude scale: a translation and validation study in asample of registered nurses in Poland.沟通技巧态度量表:波兰注册护士样本中的翻译和验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e028691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028691.

引用本文的文献

1
Staff Attitude Towards Coercive Measures in Hospital and Community Psychiatric Settings.医院和社区精神科环境中工作人员对强制手段的态度。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 22;14(9):2886. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092886.
2
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale.员工对强制手段态度量表土耳其语版的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 29;12(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02013-z.
3
A Scoping Review on Staff Attitudes towards the Use of Coercion in Mental Healthcare.关于精神卫生保健中工作人员对使用强制手段态度的范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;12(16):1552. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161552.
4
Coercion in psychiatry: psychometric validation of the Portuguese Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS).精神病学中的强制手段:葡萄牙员工对强制手段态度量表(SACS)的心理测量学验证
Discov Ment Health. 2024 Aug 14;4(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00083-4.
5
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the staff attitude to coercion scale: an exploratory factor analysis.意大利版工作人员对强制态度量表的心理测量特性:探索性因素分析
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 24;14:1172803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1172803. eCollection 2023.
6
Systematic literature review of the use of Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS).关于员工对强制手段量表(SACS)使用情况的系统文献综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 7;14:1063276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1063276. eCollection 2023.
7
Development of the Japanese version of Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale.《日本版工作人员对强制手段态度量表》的编制
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 17;13:1026676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1026676. eCollection 2022.
8
Measurement Properties of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale: A Systematic Review.《工作人员对强制态度量表的测量属性:系统评价》
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 28;13:744661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.744661. eCollection 2022.
9
Measuring Staff Attitudes to Coercion in Poland.衡量波兰员工对强制手段的态度。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 16;12:745215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.745215. eCollection 2021.