Anitua Eduardo, Fernández-de-Retana Sofía, Alkhraisat Mohammad Hamdan
Clínica Eduardo Anitua, Vitoria, Spain.
BTI Biotechnology Institute, Vitoria, Spain.
Eur J Dent. 2020 Mar;14(2):194-199. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709895. Epub 2020 May 24.
The aim of this study was to determine whether the screw emergence angulation correction by computer-aided design (CAD)-computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) can influence implant survival and marginal bone stability.
This was a controlled split-mouth retrospective study of angled channel restorations. The dental implants supporting the prosthesis were divided into the following two groups: the first group (Group 1) included the implants that required screw channel angulation, while the second group (Group 2) included the implants that did not require this correction to screw the prosthesis to the implant. The main outcome variables were implant survival and marginal bone loss (MBL).
A total of 68 dental implants placed in 22 patients were included in the final cohort. The mean follow-up time was 39.65 ± 15.20 months. None of the studied implants failed during the follow-up period and the mean MBL was - 0.29 ± 0.51 mm at the end of the follow-up. No statistical differences in the MBL were observed between the two groups of the study (-0.18 ± 0.51 and - 0.23 ± 0.58 mm, respectively).
The angulation of the screw channel with CAD-CAM technology resulted in good clinical outcomes and did not affect MBL. Thus, the angulated screw channel might be considered an alternative to face undesired screw emergencies. Future prospective clinical studies should confirm these results.
本研究旨在确定通过计算机辅助设计(CAD)-计算机辅助制造(CAM)进行螺钉穿出角度校正是否会影响种植体的存留率和边缘骨稳定性。
这是一项关于倾斜通道修复体的对照性半口回顾性研究。支持修复体的牙种植体被分为以下两组:第一组(组1)包括需要螺钉通道角度校正的种植体,而第二组(组2)包括在将修复体旋入种植体时不需要这种校正的种植体。主要观察变量为种植体存留率和边缘骨吸收(MBL)。
最终队列纳入了22例患者植入的68颗牙种植体。平均随访时间为39.65±15.20个月。在随访期间,所研究的种植体均未失败,随访结束时平均MBL为-0.29±0.51mm。两组之间的MBL未观察到统计学差异(分别为-0.18±0.51和-0.23±0.58mm)。
采用CAD-CAM技术进行螺钉通道角度校正可获得良好的临床效果,且不影响MBL。因此,倾斜螺钉通道可被视为应对不良螺钉情况的一种替代方法。未来的前瞻性临床研究应证实这些结果。