• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同垂直种植位置相关的边缘骨水平变化:一项3年的回顾性研究。

Marginal bone level changes in association with different vertical implant positions: a 3-year retrospective study.

作者信息

Kim Yeon-Tae, Lim Gyu-Hyung, Lee Jae-Hong, Jeong Seong-Nyum

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Aug;47(4):231-239. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.231. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

DOI:10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.231
PMID:28861287
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5577441/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the relationship between the vertical position of the implant-abutment interface and marginal bone loss over 3 years using radiological analysis.

METHODS

In total, 286 implant surfaces of 143 implants from 61 patients were analyzed. Panoramic radiographic images were taken immediately after implant installation and at 6, 12, and 36 months after loading. The implants were classified into 3 groups based on the vertical position of the implant-abutment interface: group A (above bone level), group B (at bone level), and group C (below bone level). The radiographs were analyzed by a single examiner.

RESULTS

Changes in marginal bone levels of 0.99±1.45, 1.13±0.91, and 1.76±0.78 mm were observed at 36 months after loading in groups A, B, and C, respectively, and bone loss was significantly greater in group C than in groups A and B.

CONCLUSIONS

The vertical position of the implant-abutment interface may affect marginal bone level change. Marginal bone loss was significantly greater in cases where the implant-abutment interface was positioned below the marginal bone. Further long-term study is required to validate our results.

摘要

目的

采用放射学分析方法,回顾性评估种植体 - 基台界面垂直位置与3年期间边缘骨丢失之间的关系。

方法

共分析了61例患者143颗种植体的286个种植体表面。在种植体植入后即刻以及加载后6、12和36个月拍摄全景X线片。根据种植体 - 基台界面的垂直位置将种植体分为3组:A组(骨水平以上)、B组(骨水平处)和C组(骨水平以下)。由一名检查者对X线片进行分析。

结果

加载后36个月时,A组、B组和C组的边缘骨水平变化分别为0.99±1.45、1.13±0.91和1.76±0.78 mm,C组的骨丢失明显大于A组和B组。

结论

种植体 - 基台界面的垂直位置可能影响边缘骨水平变化。种植体 - 基台界面位于边缘骨下方时,边缘骨丢失明显更大。需要进一步的长期研究来验证我们的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d8/5577441/b11e62fc1672/jpis-47-231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d8/5577441/b11e62fc1672/jpis-47-231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d8/5577441/b11e62fc1672/jpis-47-231-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Marginal bone level changes in association with different vertical implant positions: a 3-year retrospective study.不同垂直种植位置相关的边缘骨水平变化:一项3年的回顾性研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Aug;47(4):231-239. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.231. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
2
Marginal bony changes in relation to different vertical positions of dental implants.与牙种植体不同垂直位置相关的边缘骨变化
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010 Oct;40(5):244-8. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2010.40.5.244. Epub 2010 Oct 31.
3
Placement of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connections with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest: a short-term (1-year) randomized prospective controlled clinical trial.种植体-基台界面位于不同牙槽嵴水平的平台转移莫氏锥度连接种植体的植入:一项短期(1 年)随机前瞻性对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):1553-63. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3184.
4
Effect of initial placement level and wall thickness on maintenance of the marginal bone level in implants with a conical implant-abutment interface: a 5-year retrospective study.种植体与基台呈锥形界面的种植体初始植入深度和壁厚对边缘骨水平维持的影响:一项5年回顾性研究
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019 Jun 21;49(3):185-192. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.3.185. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
Minimum Abutment Height to Eliminate Bone Loss: Influence of Implant Neck Design and Platform Switching.消除骨吸收的最小基台高度:种植体颈部设计和平台转换的影响
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 March/April;33(2):405–411. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5604. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
6
Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.微间隙大小对非潜入式牙种植体嵴顶骨水平的影响:犬下颌骨的影像学研究
J Periodontol. 2002 Oct;73(10):1111-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1111.
7
Comparison of Marginal Bone Changes with Internal Conus and External Hexagon Design Implant Systems: A Prospective, Randomized Study.内锥和外六边形设计种植系统边缘骨变化的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Sep-Oct;36(5):631-42. doi: 10.11607/prd.2433.
8
Biological width establishment around dental implants is influenced by abutment height irrespective of vertical mucosal thickness: A cluster randomized controlled trial.种植体周围生物学宽度的建立受基台高度影响,而与垂直黏膜厚度无关:一项集群随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jul;30(7):649-659. doi: 10.1111/clr.13450. Epub 2019 May 12.
9
The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs.种植体与基台直径不匹配对犬根尖片显示的牙槽嵴骨水平的影响。
J Periodontol. 2008 Feb;79(2):260-70. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070132.
10
Factors Influencing Early Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Positioned Subcrestally: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study.影响牙槽嵴顶下种植体周围早期边缘骨丧失的因素:一项多中心前瞻性临床研究
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 4;8(8):1168. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081168.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Dental Implants in Routine Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.常规临床实践中牙种植体的效果:一项回顾性多中心研究
Int J Dent. 2025 Feb 23;2025:9930477. doi: 10.1155/ijod/9930477. eCollection 2025.
2
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study of Naproxen During Dental Implant Osseointegration.萘普生在牙种植体骨整合过程中的随机、安慰剂对照试验性研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Feb;11(1):e70065. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70065.
3
Effect of vertical implant position on marginal bone loss: a randomized clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Crestal bone changes in macrogeometrically similar implants with the implant-abutment connection at the crestal bone level or 2.5 mm above: a prospective randomized clinical trial.种植体-基台连接位于牙槽嵴顶骨水平或其上方2.5毫米处的宏观几何形状相似的种植体的牙槽嵴骨变化:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Dec;27(12):1479-1484. doi: 10.1111/clr.12581. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
2
Systematic review of current dental implant coating materials and novel coating techniques.当前牙科植入物涂层材料及新型涂层技术的系统评价。
Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Jan-Feb;28(1):51-9. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4124.
3
Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications.
垂直种植体位置对边缘骨丧失的影响:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04480-7.
4
Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study.种植体修复前在嵴顶和嵴下水平植入的内锥连接种植体的边缘骨丢失:一项随机临床研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 23;15(10):3729. doi: 10.3390/ma15103729.
5
Aesthetic Outcomes and Peri-Implant Health of Angled Screw Retained Implant Restorations Compared with Cement Retained Crowns: Medium Term Follow-Up.角度螺丝固位种植体修复与粘结固位冠的美学效果及种植体周围健康状况:中期随访
J Funct Biomater. 2021 May 16;12(2):35. doi: 10.3390/jfb12020035.
6
Marginal bone loss around oral implants supporting fixed versus removable prostheses: a systematic review.支持固定修复与活动修复的口腔种植体周围边缘骨丧失:一项系统评价
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Jun 3;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00217-7.
7
Survival and Marginal Bone Loss of Dental Implants Supporting Cad-Cam Angled Channel Restorations: A Split-Mouth Retrospective Study.支持计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD-CAM)角度通道修复体的牙种植体的存留率及边缘骨吸收:一项双侧对照回顾性研究
Eur J Dent. 2020 Mar;14(2):194-199. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709895. Epub 2020 May 24.
8
Bone Loss in Implants Placed at Subcrestal and Crestal Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.种植于牙槽嵴顶以下和牙槽嵴顶水平的种植体骨吸收:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jan 5;12(1):154. doi: 10.3390/ma12010154.
过去十年中种植体牙科的进展:较老和较新出版物中存活率和并发症发生率的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:308-24. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2.
4
Impact of implant-abutment connection and positioning of the machined collar/microgap on crestal bone level changes: a systematic review.种植体-基台连接以及机加工颈部/微间隙的位置对嵴顶骨水平变化的影响:一项系统评价
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Apr;25(4):417-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12215. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
5
The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis.内连接和外连接方式对种植体周围牙槽骨变化的影响:放射学分析。
J Periodontol. 2012 Sep;83(9):1104-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110456. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
6
Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss around submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.种植体周围影像学骨吸收与微间隙位置及形态的关系:一项犬的实验研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):941-6.
7
Marginal bony changes in relation to different vertical positions of dental implants.与牙种植体不同垂直位置相关的边缘骨变化
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010 Oct;40(5):244-8. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2010.40.5.244. Epub 2010 Oct 31.
8
Evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss using modified abutment connections at various crestal level placements.在不同嵴顶水平位置使用改良基台连接评估种植体周围边缘骨丢失情况。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Dec;30(6):609-17.
9
Dental implant systems.牙种植系统
Int J Mol Sci. 2010 Apr 12;11(4):1580-678. doi: 10.3390/ijms11041580.
10
A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns.种植体支持单冠5年生存率和并发症发生率的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Feb;19(2):119-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.