Neurology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, Insubria University, DMC, Varese, Italy.
Neuro-Otology and Neuro-Ophthalmology Lab, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
J Neurol. 2020 Oct;267(10):2842-2850. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09905-1. Epub 2020 May 24.
Vestibular migraine (VM) is a relatively recently acknowledged vestibular syndrome with a very relevant prevalence of about 10% among patients complaining of vertigo. The diagnostic criteria for VM have been recently published by the Bárány Society, and they are now included in the latest version of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, yet there is no instrumental test that supports the diagnosis of VM.
In the hypothesis that the integration of different vestibular stimuli is functionally impaired in VM, we tested whether the combination of abrupt vestibular stimuli and full-field, moving visual stimuli would challenge vestibular migraine patients more than controls and other non-vestibular migraineurs.
In three clinical centers, we compared the performance in the functional head impulse test (fHIT) without and with an optokinetic stimulus rotating in the frontal plane in a group of 44 controls (Ctrl), a group of 42 patients with migraine (not vestibular migraine, MnoV), a group of 39 patients with vestibular migraine (VM) and a group of 15 patients with vestibular neuritis (VN).
The optokinetic stimulation reduced the percentage of correct answers (%CA) in all groups, and in about 33% of the patients with migraine, in as many as 87% of VM patients and 60% of VN patients, this reduction was larger than expected from controls' data.
The comparison of the fHIT results without and with optokinetic stimulation unveils a functional vestibular impairment in VM that is not as large as the one detectable in VN, and that, in contrast with all the other patient groups, mainly impairs the capability to integrate different vestibular stimuli.
前庭性偏头痛(VM)是一种相对较新的前庭综合征,约有 10%的眩晕患者患有该病。Bárány 学会最近公布了 VM 的诊断标准,这些标准现已纳入最新版国际头痛疾病分类,然而目前尚无支持 VM 诊断的仪器检查。
在 VM 患者的不同前庭刺激整合功能受损的假设下,我们测试了突发前庭刺激与全视野、移动视觉刺激相结合是否会比对照组和其他非前庭偏头痛患者更能挑战前庭性偏头痛患者。
在三个临床中心,我们比较了 44 名对照组(Ctrl)、42 名偏头痛患者(非前庭偏头痛,MnoV)、39 名前庭性偏头痛患者(VM)和 15 名前庭神经炎患者(VN)在功能性头脉冲试验(fHIT)中有无视动刺激的表现。
视动刺激降低了所有组的正确回答百分比(%CA),在大约 33%的偏头痛患者中,VM 患者中有多达 87%,VN 患者中有 60%,这种减少比对照组的数据预期的要大。
比较无和有视动刺激的 fHIT 结果揭示了 VM 中的功能性前庭障碍,其程度不如 VN 中可检测到的那么大,与所有其他患者组不同,主要损害了整合不同前庭刺激的能力。