• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间在共同决策中的作用是什么?

What's the Role of Time in Shared Decision Making?

机构信息

Dual-degree MD and master of population health sciences candidate at Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri.

Assistant professor of medicine in the Bioethics Research Center at Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2020 May 1;22(5):E416-422. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.416.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2020.416
PMID:32449658
Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) is a desirable process and outcome of patient-clinician relationships. Ideally, patients and clinicians have sufficient time to engage in SDM. In reality, time is often insufficient. This article explores time as a barrier to SDM, alternative ways clinicians can think about time, and steps they can take to have fulfilling SDM interactions despite time constraints. Although discussions of time typically focus on time quantity, redirecting attention to the ethical significance of time in establishing patient-clinician relationships suggests the importance of also considering time quality.

摘要

共享决策(SDM)是医患关系中理想的过程和结果。理想情况下,患者和临床医生有足够的时间参与 SDM。但实际上,时间往往是不够的。本文探讨了时间作为 SDM 的障碍,临床医生如何思考时间的替代方式,以及他们可以采取哪些步骤来在时间受限的情况下进行富有成效的 SDM 互动。尽管关于时间的讨论通常集中在时间数量上,但将注意力重新集中到时间在建立医患关系中的伦理意义上,表明了考虑时间质量的重要性。

相似文献

1
What's the Role of Time in Shared Decision Making?时间在共同决策中的作用是什么?
AMA J Ethics. 2020 May 1;22(5):E416-422. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.416.
2
Overcoming Obstacles to Shared Mental Health Decision Making.克服共同心理健康决策的障碍。
AMA J Ethics. 2020 May 1;22(5):E446-451. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.446.
3
Beyond Shared Decision Making.超越共同决策。
J Clin Ethics. 2020 Winter;31(4):293-302.
4
Making shared decisions in relation to planned caesarean sections: What are we up to?计划剖宫产术相关的共同决策:我们在做什么?
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jun;103(6):1176-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
5
Shared decision making in pediatric dermatology: context, opportunities, and practical examples.儿科皮肤科的共同决策:背景、机遇及实例
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;33(4):402-409. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001039.
6
Assessment of Shared Decision-making for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.评估心房颤动患者卒中预防的共同决策:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;180(9):1215-1224. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2908.
7
Meaningful shared decision-making: complex process demanding cognitive and emotional skills.有意义的共同决策:需要认知和情感技能的复杂过程。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):431-438. doi: 10.1111/jep.13349. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
8
The experiences of shared decision-making of women who had an induction of labour.产妇选择引产的共同决策体验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Mar;104(3):489-495. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
9
What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening.共享决策究竟是什么?一项关于肺癌筛查中共享决策的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Feb;35(2):546-553. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05516-3. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
10
Core Elements of Shared Decision-making for Women Considering Breast Cancer Screening: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey.考虑乳腺癌筛查的女性共同决策的核心要素:改良德尔菲调查结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1668-1677. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05298-8. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared Decision-Making for Restoring Trust in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the Post-pandemic Era.大流行后时代恢复对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病管理信任的共同决策
Adv Ther. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03182-y.
2
A Quantitative Study Exploring and Comparing Key Factors in Medication Management in the Irish Healthcare Setting.一项探索和比较爱尔兰医疗环境中药物管理关键因素的定量研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70256. doi: 10.1111/hex.70256.
3
Factors Influencing Patient-Centered Care and Shared Decision-Making in Primary Care Settings in Saudi Arabia: A Scoping Review.
影响沙特阿拉伯基层医疗环境中以患者为中心的护理和共同决策的因素:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2024 Dec 21;16(12):e76142. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76142. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Expert Panel Perspective: Shared Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Team-Based Cardiovascular Care.专家小组观点:多学科团队心血管护理中的共同决策
JACC Adv. 2024 Jul 3;3(7):100981. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100981. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Interactional competencies in medical student admission- what makes a "good medical doctor"?医学生录取中的互动能力——怎样才是一名“优秀的医生”?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Apr;30(2):439-458. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10348-w. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
6
Genetic counselors' and community clinicians' implementation and perceived barriers to informed consent during pre-test counseling for hereditary cancer risk.遗传咨询师和社区临床医生在遗传性癌症风险检测前咨询过程中实施知情同意的情况及感知到的障碍。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Feb;34(1):e1887. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1887. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
7
Clinicians' Perspectives and Proposed Solutions to Improve Contraceptive Counseling in the United States: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Clinicians From the Society of Family Planning.临床医生对改善美国避孕咨询的看法及建议解决方案:对计划生育协会临床医生的定性半结构化访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 21;7:e47298. doi: 10.2196/47298.
8
Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions.与黑人男性进行概念映射:前列腺癌筛查的障碍及解决方案。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Dec;38(6):1808-1815. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02336-2. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
9
Increasing Quality and Frequency of Goals-of-Care Documentation in the Highest-Risk Surgical Candidates: One-Year Results of the Surgical Pause Program.提高高风险手术患者护理目标记录的质量和频率:手术暂停计划的一年结果
JB JS Open Access. 2023 Apr 24;8(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00107. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
10
Disparities in Shared Decision-Making Research and Practice: The Case for Black American Patients.共享决策研究与实践中的差异:以美国黑人患者为例。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Mar-Apr;21(2):112-118. doi: 10.1370/afm.2943. Epub 2023 Feb 7.