• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同招生名额在医学国家考试第一部分中的考试表现：一项横断面研究。

Exam performance of different admission quotas in the first part of the state examination in medicine: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Division of Study and Teaching, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, House 2, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.

The German National Institute for state examinations in Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychotherapy, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 25;20(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02069-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-020-02069-6
PMID:32450862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7249435/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most medical students in Germany are admitted via selection procedures, which are adjusted to the demands of the universities. At Lübeck medical school, scores from interviews that measure non-academic skills and pre-university GPAs are summed to arrive at an admission decision. This article seeks to illuminate the effectiveness of this selection procedure in comparison to other non-selected student groups.

METHODS

Quota information and exam results from the first federal exam were linked for students admitted to Lübeck medical school between 2012 and 2015 (N = 655). Five different student groups (university-specific selection quota, pre-university GPA quota, waiting time quota, ex-ante quota and foreign students) were compared regarding exam attempts, written and oral grades, temporal continuity and examination success in the standard study period.

RESULTS

While the pre-university GPA quota outperformed all other quotas regarding written and oral grades, it did not differ from the selection quota regarding exam attempts, temporal continuity and examination success in the standard study period. Students in the waiting time and ex-ante quotas performed inferior by comparison. The results of foreign students were the most problematic.

CONCLUSION

Students selected by the university show high temporal continuity and examination success. These results, and possible advantages in physician eligibility, argue for the utilisation of non-academic skills for admission.

摘要

背景

大多数德国医学生都是通过选拔程序被录取的，这些程序是根据大学的要求进行调整的。在吕贝克医学院，通过面试测量非学术技能和大学预科 GPA 的分数将被加总，以做出录取决定。本文旨在与其他未被选拔的学生群体相比，阐明这种选拔程序的有效性。

方法

为 2012 年至 2015 年期间被吕贝克医学院录取的学生（N=655），链接了配额信息和第一次联邦考试的考试成绩。比较了五个不同的学生群体（大学特定的选拔配额、大学预科 GPA 配额、等待时间配额、预先配额和外国学生）在考试次数、书面和口头成绩、时间连续性和标准学习期间的考试成功率方面的差异。

结果

虽然大学预科 GPA 配额在书面和口头成绩方面优于所有其他配额，但在考试次数、时间连续性和标准学习期间的考试成功率方面与选拔配额没有差异。相比之下，等待时间和预先配额的学生表现较差。外国学生的成绩则最为不理想。

结论

由大学选拔的学生表现出较高的时间连续性和考试成功率。这些结果以及在医生资格方面的可能优势，支持将非学术技能用于录取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7b3/7249435/bd7da9013e9b/12909_2020_2069_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7b3/7249435/cc2d3675105c/12909_2020_2069_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7b3/7249435/bd7da9013e9b/12909_2020_2069_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7b3/7249435/cc2d3675105c/12909_2020_2069_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7b3/7249435/bd7da9013e9b/12909_2020_2069_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exam performance of different admission quotas in the first part of the state examination in medicine: a cross-sectional study.不同招生名额在医学国家考试第一部分中的考试表现：一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 25;20(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02069-6.
2
Selection and academic success of medical students in Hamburg, Germany.德国汉堡的医学生选拔与学业成就。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 16;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1443-4.
3
The predictive validity of admission criteria for the results of clinical competency assessment with an emphasis on family medicine in the fifth year of medical education: an observational study.医学教育第五年临床能力评估结果入院标准的预测效度：一项观察性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 12;22(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03293-y.
4
From HAM-Nat to the "Physikum" - Analysis of the study success parameters before and after the introduction of a science test in the approval procedure.从汉姆-纳特到“医学预科”——对审批程序中引入科学测试前后的学习成功参数分析
GMS J Med Educ. 2018 Aug 15;35(3):Doc30. doi: 10.3205/zma001176. eCollection 2018.
5
A holistic review of the medical school admission process: examining correlates of academic underperformance.医学专业招生流程的全面审查：分析学业表现不佳的相关因素。
Med Educ Online. 2014 Apr 1;19:22919. doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.22919. eCollection 2014.
6
Clinical experience can compensate for inferior academic achievements in an undergraduate objective structured clinical examination.临床经验可以弥补本科生客观结构化临床考试中较差的学业成绩。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 16;23(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04082-x.
7
Bachelor completion and dropout rates of selected, rejected and lottery-admitted medical students in the Netherlands.荷兰部分、被拒和抽签录取医学生的本科学位完成率和辍学率。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1511-4.
8
Correlation of admissions statistics to graduate student success in medical physics.研究生在医学物理学中取得成功与入学统计数据的相关性。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Jan 6;15(1):4451. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4451.
9
Academic Performance of Students with the Highest and Mediocre School-leaving Grades: Does the Aptitude Test for Medical Studies (TMS) Balance Their Prognoses?高中毕业成绩优异和成绩中等的学生的学业表现：医学学习能力倾向测试（TMS）能否平衡他们的预后？
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Feb 15;33(1):Doc7. doi: 10.3205/zma001006. eCollection 2016.
10
Admission criteria and academic performance in medical school.医学专业的入学标准和学业表现。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 21;23(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04251-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Physicians' Social Skills - Conceptualization, Taxonomy, and Behavioral Assessment.医生的社交技能——概念化、分类法及行为评估
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Dec 26;13(1):635-645. doi: 10.5334/pme.1171. eCollection 2024.
2
Female Attendings in University Clinics of Surgery in Germany: A Scoping Analysis of an Ongoing Disparity.德国大学外科诊所中的女性主治医师：对持续存在的差异的范围分析。
Cureus. 2024 May 22;16(5):e60860. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60860. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Admission criteria and academic performance in medical school.医学专业的入学标准和学业表现。

本文引用的文献

1
Do Medical Students in Their Fifth Year of Undergraduate Training Differ in Their Suitability to Become a "Good Doctor" Depending on Their Admission Criteria? A Pilot Study.本科培训五年级的医学生因其入学标准不同，在成为“好医生”的适宜性方面是否存在差异？一项试点研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Feb 7;11:109-112. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S235529. eCollection 2020.
2
Mental Health, Academic Self-Efficacy and Study Progress Among College Students - The SHoT Study, Norway.挪威大学生的心理健康、学业自我效能感与学习进展——SHoT研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 24;10:45. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00045. eCollection 2019.
3
Selection and academic success of medical students in Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 21;23(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04251-y.
4
The predictive validity of admission criteria for the results of clinical competency assessment with an emphasis on family medicine in the fifth year of medical education: an observational study.医学教育第五年临床能力评估结果入院标准的预测效度：一项观察性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 12;22(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03293-y.
5
Are different medical school admission tests associated with the outcomes of a simulation-based OSCE?不同的医学院入学考试与基于模拟的 OSCE 结果相关吗？
BMC Med Educ. 2021 May 7;21(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02703-x.
6
Correction to: Exam performance of different admission quotas in the first part of the state examination in medicine: a cross-sectional study.对《医学国家考试第一部分中不同录取配额的考试表现：一项横断面研究》的更正
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 25;20(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02098-1.
德国汉堡的医学生选拔与学业成就。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 16;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1443-4.
4
Welcome, Orientation, Language Training: a project at the Charité for new international medical students.欢迎、迎新、语言培训：柏林夏里特医学院针对国际新生开展的项目。
GMS J Med Educ. 2018 Nov 30;35(5):Doc59. doi: 10.3205/zma001205. eCollection 2018.
5
Does selection pay off? A cost-benefit comparison of medical school selection and lottery systems.选拔是否有回报？医学院校选拔和抽签系统的成本效益比较。
Med Educ. 2018 Dec;52(12):1240-1248. doi: 10.1111/medu.13698. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
6
The impact of the program structure at Hannover Medical School on academic success in medical studies.汉诺威医学院的课程结构对医学学习学业成就的影响。
GMS J Med Educ. 2018 May 15;35(2):Doc22. doi: 10.3205/zma001169. eCollection 2018.
7
[Selection of medical students : Measurement of cognitive abilities and psychosocial competencies].[医学生的选拔：认知能力和社会心理能力的测量]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Feb;61(2):178-186. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2670-2.
8
[Competence-based assessment in the national licensing examination in Germany].[德国国家执照考试中的基于能力的评估]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Feb;61(2):171-177. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2668-9.
9
Performance of International Medical Students In psychosocial medicine.国际医学生在社会心理医学方面的表现。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0950-z.
10
Predicting success in medical school: a longitudinal study of common Australian student selection tools.预测医学院学习的成功：对澳大利亚常用学生选拔工具的纵向研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 22;16:187. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0692-3.