Suppr超能文献

不同招生名额在医学国家考试第一部分中的考试表现:一项横断面研究。

Exam performance of different admission quotas in the first part of the state examination in medicine: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Division of Study and Teaching, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, House 2, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.

The German National Institute for state examinations in Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychotherapy, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 25;20(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02069-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most medical students in Germany are admitted via selection procedures, which are adjusted to the demands of the universities. At Lübeck medical school, scores from interviews that measure non-academic skills and pre-university GPAs are summed to arrive at an admission decision. This article seeks to illuminate the effectiveness of this selection procedure in comparison to other non-selected student groups.

METHODS

Quota information and exam results from the first federal exam were linked for students admitted to Lübeck medical school between 2012 and 2015 (N = 655). Five different student groups (university-specific selection quota, pre-university GPA quota, waiting time quota, ex-ante quota and foreign students) were compared regarding exam attempts, written and oral grades, temporal continuity and examination success in the standard study period.

RESULTS

While the pre-university GPA quota outperformed all other quotas regarding written and oral grades, it did not differ from the selection quota regarding exam attempts, temporal continuity and examination success in the standard study period. Students in the waiting time and ex-ante quotas performed inferior by comparison. The results of foreign students were the most problematic.

CONCLUSION

Students selected by the university show high temporal continuity and examination success. These results, and possible advantages in physician eligibility, argue for the utilisation of non-academic skills for admission.

摘要

背景

大多数德国医学生都是通过选拔程序被录取的,这些程序是根据大学的要求进行调整的。在吕贝克医学院,通过面试测量非学术技能和大学预科 GPA 的分数将被加总,以做出录取决定。本文旨在与其他未被选拔的学生群体相比,阐明这种选拔程序的有效性。

方法

为 2012 年至 2015 年期间被吕贝克医学院录取的学生(N=655),链接了配额信息和第一次联邦考试的考试成绩。比较了五个不同的学生群体(大学特定的选拔配额、大学预科 GPA 配额、等待时间配额、预先配额和外国学生)在考试次数、书面和口头成绩、时间连续性和标准学习期间的考试成功率方面的差异。

结果

虽然大学预科 GPA 配额在书面和口头成绩方面优于所有其他配额,但在考试次数、时间连续性和标准学习期间的考试成功率方面与选拔配额没有差异。相比之下,等待时间和预先配额的学生表现较差。外国学生的成绩则最为不理想。

结论

由大学选拔的学生表现出较高的时间连续性和考试成功率。这些结果以及在医生资格方面的可能优势,支持将非学术技能用于录取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7b3/7249435/cc2d3675105c/12909_2020_2069_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验