Department of Large Animal Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke 9820, Belgium.
Département des Sciences Cliniques, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 rue Sicotte, St-Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 2M2, Canada.
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2020 Jul;36(2):425-444. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.03.005.
When it is desired to identify infectious agents involved in an outbreak of bovine respiratory disease, a variety of possible sampling methods may be used. For field use, the deep nasopharyngeal swab, transtracheal wash, and nonendoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage are most feasible. At present, bacterial culture and polymerase chain reaction testing are most commonly used to identify infectious agents. Interpretation of test results can be challenging, particularly for opportunistic pathogens. Evidence-based guidelines for precise interpretation of microbiologic tests results are lacking; however, approaches that have been practically useful for the management of bovine respiratory disease outbreaks are presented.
当需要鉴定引起牛呼吸道疾病暴发的感染因子时,可能会使用各种不同的采样方法。对于现场使用,深层鼻咽拭子、气管冲洗和非内镜支气管肺泡灌洗是最可行的。目前,细菌培养和聚合酶链反应检测是最常用的鉴定感染因子的方法。测试结果的解释可能具有挑战性,特别是对于机会性病原体。目前缺乏用于准确解释微生物检测结果的循证指南;然而,提出了一些在管理牛呼吸道疾病暴发方面实际有用的方法。