EA 4489 Perinatal Environment and Health, University of Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Department of Obstetrics, CHU Lille, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Aug;35(4):771-777. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00535-6. Epub 2020 May 25.
Fetal well-being during labor is usually assessed by visual analysis of a fetal heart rate (FHR) tracing. Our primary objective was to evaluate the ability of automated heart rate variability (HRV) analysis methods, including our new fetal stress index (FSI), to predict neonatal acidosis. 552 intrapartum recordings were analyzed. The analysis occurred in the last 90 min before birth and was conducted during two 5-min intervals: (i) a stable period of FHR and (ii) the period corresponding to the maximum FSI value. For each period, we computed the mean FHR, FSI, short-term variability (STV), and long-term variability (LTV). Visual FHR interpretation was performed using the FIGO classification. The population was separated into two groups: (i) an acidotic group with an arterial pH at birth ≤ 7.10 and a control group. Prediction of a neonatal pH ≤ 7.10 was assessed by computing the receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC). FHR, FSI, STV, and LTV did not differ significantly between groups during the stable period. During the FSI max peak period, LTV and STV correlated significantly in the acidotic group (- 5.85 ± 2.19, p = 0.010 and - 0.62 ± 0.29, p = 0.037, respectively). The AUC values were 0.569 for FIGO classification, 0.595 for STV, and 0.622 for LTV. The multivariate model (FIGO, FSI, FC, STV, LTV) had the greatest accuracy for predicting acidosis (AUC = 0.719). FSI was not predictive of neonatal acidosis probably because of the low quality of the FHR signal in cardiotocography. When used separately, HRV indexes and visual FHR analysis were poor predictors of neonatal acidosis. Including all indexes in a multivariate model increased the predictive ability.
胎儿在分娩过程中的健康状况通常通过对胎儿心率 (FHR) 迹线的视觉分析来评估。我们的主要目的是评估自动心率变异性 (HRV) 分析方法的能力,包括我们新的胎儿应激指数 (FSI),以预测新生儿酸中毒。分析了 552 份产时记录。分析发生在分娩前的最后 90 分钟内,在两个 5 分钟间隔内进行:(i) FHR 稳定期和 (ii) 对应最大 FSI 值的时期。对于每个时期,我们计算了平均 FHR、FSI、短期变异性 (STV) 和长期变异性 (LTV)。使用 FIGO 分类法进行 FHR 的视觉解释。人群分为两组:(i) 出生时动脉 pH 值≤7.10 的酸中毒组和对照组。通过计算受试者工作特征曲线下的面积 (AUC) 来评估预测新生儿 pH 值≤7.10 的能力。在稳定期,两组之间的 FHR、FSI、STV 和 LTV 没有显著差异。在 FSI 最大值期间,酸中毒组的 LTV 和 STV 呈显著相关 (-5.85±2.19,p=0.010 和 -0.62±0.29,p=0.037)。FIGO 分类的 AUC 值为 0.569,STV 为 0.595,LTV 为 0.622。多变量模型 (FIGO、FSI、FC、STV、LTV) 对预测酸中毒的准确性最高 (AUC=0.719)。FSI 不能预测新生儿酸中毒,可能是因为胎儿心电图中的 FHR 信号质量较低。当单独使用时,HRV 指数和 FHR 分析对新生儿酸中毒的预测能力较差。将所有指数纳入多变量模型可提高预测能力。