Kim Jung Soo, Lee Man Jong, Park Mi Hwa, Park Jae Yoen, Kim Ah Jin
Inha University Hospital Rapid Response Team (INHART), Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Nov;37(11):943-949. doi: 10.1177/1049909120927372. Epub 2020 May 26.
An important role of the rapid response system (RRS) is to provide opportunities for end-of-life care (EOLC) decisions to be appropriately operationalized. We investigated whether EOLC decisions were made after the RRS-recommended EOLC decision to the primary physician.
We studied whether patients made EOLC decisions consistent with the rapid response team's (RRT) recommendations, between January 1, 2017, and February 28, 2019. The primary outcome was the EOLC decision after the RRT's recommendation to the primary physician. The secondary outcome was the mechanism of EOLC decision-making: through institutional do-not-resuscitate forms or the Korean legal forms of Life-Sustaining Treatment Plan (LSTP).
Korean LSTPs were used in 26 of the 58 patients who selected EOLC, from among the 75 patients for whom the RRS made an EOLC recommendation. Approximately 7.2% of EOLC decisions for inpatients were related to the RRT's interventions in EOLC decisions. Patients who made EOLC decisions did not receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, or dialysis.
The timely intervention of the RRS in EOLC facilitates an objective assessment of the patient's medical conditions, the limitation of treatments that may be minimally beneficial to the patient, and the choice of a higher quality of care. The EOLC decision using the legal process defined in the relevant Korean Act has advantages, wherein patients can clarify their preference, the family can prioritize the patient's preference for EOLC decisions, and physicians can make transparent EOLC decisions based on medical evidence and informed patient consent.
快速反应系统(RRS)的一个重要作用是为临终关怀(EOLC)决策的适当实施提供机会。我们调查了在RRS向主治医生推荐EOLC决策后,是否做出了EOLC决策。
我们研究了在2017年1月1日至2019年2月28日期间,患者做出的EOLC决策是否与快速反应小组(RRT)的建议一致。主要结局是RRT向主治医生提出建议后的EOLC决策。次要结局是EOLC决策的机制:通过机构的不进行心肺复苏表格或韩国法定的维持生命治疗计划(LSTP)表格。
在RRS提出EOLC建议的75例患者中,58例选择EOLC的患者中有26例使用了韩国的LSTP。住院患者中约7.2%的EOLC决策与RRT在EOLC决策中的干预有关。做出EOLC决策的患者未接受心肺复苏、机械通气或透析。
RRS在EOLC中的及时干预有助于对患者的医疗状况进行客观评估,限制对患者可能益处极小的治疗,并选择更高质量的护理。使用韩国相关法案中定义的法律程序进行EOLC决策具有优势,患者可以阐明自己的偏好,家属可以将患者对EOLC决策的偏好放在首位,医生可以基于医学证据和患者知情同意做出透明的EOLC决策。