• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接口服抗凝剂治疗的心房颤动患者的最佳血压水平是多少?

What is the optimal blood pressure level for patients with atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulants?

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Cerebral Haemodynamics in Ageing and Stroke Medicine (CHiASM) Research Group.

National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2020 Sep;38(9):1820-1828. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002487.

DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000002487
PMID:32453015
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Limited data exist to inform blood pressure (BP) thresholds for patients with atrial fibrillation prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) therapy in the real world setting.

METHODS

SBP was measured in 9051 primary care patients in England on DOACs for atrial fibrillation with postinitiation BP levels available within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The incidence rate for the primary outcome of the first recorded event (defined as a diagnosis of first stroke, recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, symptomatic intracranial bleed, or significant gastrointestinal bleed) and of secondary outcomes all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were calculated by postinitiation BP groups.

RESULTS

The Cox proportional hazard ratio of an event [crude and adjusted hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.08), P = 0.077 and 0.071, respectively] did not differ significantly with a 10 mmHg increase in SBP. The hazard of all-cause mortality [crude hazard ratio 0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.86), P = 0.000; adjusted hazard ratio 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.87), P = 0.000] and cardiovascular mortality [crude hazard ratio 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.99), P = 0.021; adjusted hazard ratio 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-1.00), P = 0.041] demonstrated a significant inverse relationship with a 10 mmHg increase in SBP. Patients with a SBP within 161-210 mmHg had the lowest all-cause death rate, while patients with SBP within 121-140 mmHg had the lowest cardiovascular death rate.

CONCLUSION

SBP values below 161 mmHg are associated higher all-cause mortality, but lower event risk in patients with atrial fibrillation on DOAC therapy. The nadir SBP for lowest event rate was 120 mmHg, for lowest cardiovascular mortality was 130 mmHg and for lowest all-cause mortality was 160 mmHg. This demonstrates a need for a prospective interventional study of BP control after initiation of anticoagulation.

摘要

目的

在真实世界环境中,接受直接口服抗凝剂 (DOAC) 治疗的心房颤动患者,目前仅有少量数据可用于指导血压 (BP) 阈值。

方法

在英格兰,9051 名接受 DOAC 治疗的心房颤动患者的初级保健中测量收缩压 (SBP),并在临床实践研究数据库中获得了起始后 BP 水平。通过起始后 BP 组计算主要结局(首次记录事件,定义为首次中风、复发性中风、心肌梗死、症状性颅内出血或重大胃肠道出血)和次要结局(全因死亡率和心血管死亡率)的发生率。

结果

事件的 Cox 比例风险比(未经调整和调整后的风险比分别为 1.04 [95%置信区间 (CI) 1.00-1.08],P=0.077 和 0.071)与 SBP 升高 10mmHg 无显著差异。全因死亡率的风险[未经调整的风险比 0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.86),P=0.000;调整后的风险比 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.87),P=0.000]和心血管死亡率[未经调整的风险比 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.99),P=0.021;调整后的风险比 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-1.00),P=0.041]与 SBP 升高 10mmHg 呈显著负相关。SBP 范围在 161-210mmHg 的患者全因死亡率最低,SBP 范围在 121-140mmHg 的患者心血管死亡率最低。

结论

接受 DOAC 治疗的心房颤动患者,SBP 值低于 161mmHg 与全因死亡率升高相关,但事件风险较低。SBP 值最低的事件发生率为 120mmHg,最低的心血管死亡率为 130mmHg,最低的全因死亡率为 160mmHg。这表明需要对抗凝治疗开始后血压控制进行前瞻性干预研究。

相似文献

1
What is the optimal blood pressure level for patients with atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulants?直接口服抗凝剂治疗的心房颤动患者的最佳血压水平是多少?
J Hypertens. 2020 Sep;38(9):1820-1828. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002487.
2
Blood pressure levels and risk of haemorrhagic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulants: results from The Swedish Primary Care Cardiovascular Database of Skaraborg.心房颤动和口服抗凝剂患者的血压水平与出血性卒中风险:来自瑞典斯卡夫司塔省初级保健心血管数据库的研究结果。
J Hypertens. 2021 Aug 1;39(8):1670-1677. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002838.
3
Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的疗效和安全性比较:一项加拿大多中心观察性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2020 Dec 18;8(4):E877-E886. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200055. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.
4
Long-Term Population-Based Cerebral Ischemic Event and Cognitive Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Warfarin Among Long-term Anticoagulated Patients for Atrial Fibrillation.在长期接受抗凝治疗的房颤患者中,直接口服抗凝剂与华法林相比的基于人群的长期脑缺血事件及认知结局
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;118(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.039. Epub 2016 May 5.
5
[Impact of history of hypertension and blood pressure levels on the risk of thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients].[高血压病史和血压水平对非瓣膜性心房颤动患者血栓栓塞风险的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 24;48(9):721-727. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200713-00552.
6
Edoxaban Versus Warfarin Stratified by Average Blood Pressure in 19 679 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Hypertension in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial.依度沙班与华法林在 ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 试验中 19679 例有高血压病史的房颤患者中的平均血压分层比较。
Hypertension. 2019 Sep;74(3):597-605. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13138. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Risks of Stroke and Mortality in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Rivaroxaban and Warfarin.利伐沙班与华法林治疗心房颤动患者的卒中风险和死亡率。
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):549-555. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025554. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
8
Clinical profile of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K anticoagulants in octogenarians with atrial fibrillation: a multicentre propensity score matched real-world cohort study.八旬老年房颤患者中直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂的临床特征:一项多中心倾向评分匹配真实世界队列研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jan;49(1):42-53. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01923-9.
9
Effectiveness and Safety of Anticoagulants in Adults with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Concomitant Coronary/Peripheral Artery Disease.非瓣膜性心房颤动合并冠状动脉/外周动脉疾病成人患者抗凝治疗的有效性和安全性。
Am J Med. 2018 Sep;131(9):1075-1085.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 26.
10
Modification of In-Hospital Recommendation and Prescription of Anticoagulants for Secondary Prevention of Stroke after Launch of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Change of National Guidelines.直接口服抗凝剂上市后和国家指南改变对卒中二级预防的住院推荐和抗凝药物处方的改变。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(4):412-418. doi: 10.1159/000509416. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Nonachievement of Target Blood Pressure in Patients on Antithrombotic Therapy: A Real-World Study.抗栓治疗患者未达目标血压的相关因素:一项真实世界研究
JMA J. 2022 Jan 17;5(1):74-82. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2021-0146. Epub 2021 Dec 15.