Yilar Sinan, Köse Mehmet, Tuncer Kutsi, Karsan Orhan, Topal Murat, Ezirmik Naci
Department of Medicine, Ataturk Universitesi.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kastamonu University Medical Faculty, Kastamonu, Turkey.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2021 Mar 1;30(2):126-131. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000752.
Closed reduction is an effective treatment method for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Still, there are certain controversial issues regarding the timing of the treatment. In this study, we investigated the results of closed reduction and Outcomes of 302 hips of 218 patients treated with closed reduction have been analyzed retrospectively. One hundred fifty-two hips that had ossific nucleus [ossific nucleus (+)] during reduction have been compared with 150 hips that had no ossific nucleus [ossific nucleus (-)] during reduction. Also, the patients have been divided into two groups, the patients treated with closed reduction before the sixth month and the patients treated with closed reduction after the sixth month. Groups have been compared between themselves in terms of avascular necrosis (AVN) and redislocation. Seventy-seven of the 112 hips treated with closed reduction in the first six months were ossific nucleus (-), and AVN has been noted in 5 (6%) patients. However, although no AVN has been seen in any of the 35 ossific nucleus (+) hips, no statistically significant difference has been found between two groups. Seventy-three of the 190 hips treated with closed reduction after the sixth month were ossific nucleus (-), and AVN has been seen in 13 (17%) of these hips. AVN has been seen in 9 (7%) of the 117 ossific nucleus (+) hips. The AVN ratio was found significantly lower in the ossific nucleus (+) hips (P < 0.034). Although the presence of ossific nucleus does not provide extra protection against AVN in before the sixth month, the presence of ossific nucleus is protective against AVN after the sixth month.
闭合复位是治疗发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)的一种有效方法。然而,关于治疗时机仍存在一些有争议的问题。在本研究中,我们对闭合复位的结果进行了调查,并对218例患者的302个髋关节进行了回顾性分析。将复位过程中有骨化核[骨化核(+)]的152个髋关节与复位过程中无骨化核[骨化核(-)]的150个髋关节进行了比较。此外,患者被分为两组,即6个月前接受闭合复位治疗的患者和6个月后接受闭合复位治疗的患者。对两组在缺血性坏死(AVN)和再脱位方面进行了比较。前6个月接受闭合复位治疗的患者中,112个髋关节有77个为骨化核(-),5例患者出现了AVN。然而,尽管35个骨化核(+)的髋关节中均未发现AVN,但两组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。6个月后接受闭合复位治疗的患者中,190个髋关节有73个为骨化核(-),其中13个(17%)出现了AVN。117个骨化核(+)的髋关节中有9个(7%)出现了AVN。骨化核(+)的髋关节中AVN发生率显著较低(P < 0.034)。虽然在6个月前骨化核的存在并不能为AVN提供额外的保护,但在6个月后骨化核的存在对AVN具有保护作用。