Jeong I-Ji, Hwang Shin, Ha Tae-Yong, Song Gi-Won, Jung Dong-Hwan, Park Gil-Chun, Ahn Chul-Soo, Moon Deok-Bog, Kim Ki-Hun, Yoon Young-In, Lee Sung-Gyu
Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2020 May 31;24(2):144-149. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.2.144.
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Hemashield vascular grafts has been used for middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We occasionally encounter outflow disturbance of MHV conduit at the anastomotic stump of the middle-left hepatic vein (MLHV) trunk. To mitigate the disturbance, we carried out a series of studies regarding hemodynamics-compliant MHV reconstruction.
This study comprised of three parts: Part 1: Determining the causes of outflow disturbance; Part 2: Computational simulative analysis; and, Part 3: Clinical application of our refined technique. The types of Hemashield conduit-MLHV stump reconstruction were end-to-end anastomosis (type 1), side-to-end anastomosis (type 2), and oblique cutting of the conduit end and patch plasty (type 3).
In Part 1 study, the reconstruction types were type 1 in 23, type 2 in 25, and type 3 in 2. Significant anastomotic stenosis was identified in 7 (30.4%) in type 1, 6 (24.0%) in type 2, and none (0%) in type 3. The size of MLHV stump was the most important factor for anastomotic stenosis. Through Part 2 study, technical knacks were developed as follows: the conduit end was cut in a dumb-bell shape and a vessel patch attached; and then sutured bidirectionally from the 9 o'clock direction. In Part 3 study, these knacks were applied to 5 patients and none of them experienced noticeable anastomotic stenosis.
Our refined technique to perform conduit-MLHV stump anastomosis appears to reduce the risk of anastomotic outflow disturbance for relatively small MLHV stump.
背景/目的:Hemashield血管移植物已用于活体肝移植(LDLT)术中的肝中静脉(MHV)重建。我们偶尔会在肝左中静脉(MLHV)主干的吻合残端遇到MHV导管的流出道干扰。为减轻这种干扰,我们开展了一系列关于符合血流动力学的MHV重建的研究。
本研究包括三个部分:第1部分:确定流出道干扰的原因;第2部分:计算模拟分析;第3部分:我们改进技术的临床应用。Hemashield导管-MLHV残端重建的类型有端端吻合(1型)、端侧吻合(2型)以及导管末端斜切并补片成形(3型)。
在第1部分研究中,重建类型为1型23例、2型25例、3型2例。1型中有7例(30.4%)发现明显的吻合口狭窄,2型中有6例(24.0%),3型中无(0%)。MLHV残端的大小是吻合口狭窄的最重要因素。通过第2部分研究,开发了如下技术诀窍:将导管末端切成哑铃形并附着血管补片;然后从9点钟方向双向缝合。在第3部分研究中,这些诀窍应用于5例患者,无一例出现明显的吻合口狭窄。
我们改进的导管-MLHV残端吻合技术似乎降低了相对较小的MLHV残端吻合口流出道干扰的风险。